Peter Koppes , Travis Guerrant , David Marks , Eric Balcerzak , Jill Brown , Matt Harman , Stephanie Shwiff
{"title":"An economic evaluation of preventing vs. suppressing HPAI outbreaks: A case study from Iowa","authors":"Peter Koppes , Travis Guerrant , David Marks , Eric Balcerzak , Jill Brown , Matt Harman , Stephanie Shwiff","doi":"10.1016/j.prevetmed.2025.106651","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This study presents an analysis comparing the costs of preventing Highly Pathogenic Avian Influenza (HPAI) in Iowa's poultry industry through wildlife management versus the costs of suppressing outbreaks once they occur. Using data from the USDA Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service's Veterinary Services and Wildlife Services, we conducted a cost-effectiveness analysis of prevention activities that reduce interactions between wild birds and domestic poultry. Our findings demonstrate that prevention efforts cost approximately $0.05 per bird, while suppression activities average $8.15 per bird in Iowa ($11.86 nationally). Results indicate that wildlife-based prevention programs would be cost-efficient, under current expenditures, if they reduced HPAI incidence by just over 3 %. The study provides compelling evidence that preventive wildlife management represents an opportunity for a more cost-effective approach to HPAI control compared to suppression measures alone, particularly given the recurrent and extensive economic impacts of recent outbreaks that have affected over 97 million birds nationally since 2022 and cost over $1.13 billion in response activities. These findings identify the need for continued evaluation of approaches to disease management to enhance the resilience of the U.S. poultry industry against the persistent threat of HPAI.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":20413,"journal":{"name":"Preventive veterinary medicine","volume":"244 ","pages":"Article 106651"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Preventive veterinary medicine","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0167587725002363","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"VETERINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
This study presents an analysis comparing the costs of preventing Highly Pathogenic Avian Influenza (HPAI) in Iowa's poultry industry through wildlife management versus the costs of suppressing outbreaks once they occur. Using data from the USDA Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service's Veterinary Services and Wildlife Services, we conducted a cost-effectiveness analysis of prevention activities that reduce interactions between wild birds and domestic poultry. Our findings demonstrate that prevention efforts cost approximately $0.05 per bird, while suppression activities average $8.15 per bird in Iowa ($11.86 nationally). Results indicate that wildlife-based prevention programs would be cost-efficient, under current expenditures, if they reduced HPAI incidence by just over 3 %. The study provides compelling evidence that preventive wildlife management represents an opportunity for a more cost-effective approach to HPAI control compared to suppression measures alone, particularly given the recurrent and extensive economic impacts of recent outbreaks that have affected over 97 million birds nationally since 2022 and cost over $1.13 billion in response activities. These findings identify the need for continued evaluation of approaches to disease management to enhance the resilience of the U.S. poultry industry against the persistent threat of HPAI.
期刊介绍:
Preventive Veterinary Medicine is one of the leading international resources for scientific reports on animal health programs and preventive veterinary medicine. The journal follows the guidelines for standardizing and strengthening the reporting of biomedical research which are available from the CONSORT, MOOSE, PRISMA, REFLECT, STARD, and STROBE statements. The journal focuses on:
Epidemiology of health events relevant to domestic and wild animals;
Economic impacts of epidemic and endemic animal and zoonotic diseases;
Latest methods and approaches in veterinary epidemiology;
Disease and infection control or eradication measures;
The "One Health" concept and the relationships between veterinary medicine, human health, animal-production systems, and the environment;
Development of new techniques in surveillance systems and diagnosis;
Evaluation and control of diseases in animal populations.