Experimental and numerical study of the interaction between a shaped charge jet and a single ERA moving plate

IF 5.9 Q1 ENGINEERING, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
Nicolas Reboul , Ashwin Chinnayya , Frédéric Paintendre , Simon Dalle Piagge , Vincent Jaulin , Jérôme Limido , Anthony Collé , Fabien Rondot
{"title":"Experimental and numerical study of the interaction between a shaped charge jet and a single ERA moving plate","authors":"Nicolas Reboul ,&nbsp;Ashwin Chinnayya ,&nbsp;Frédéric Paintendre ,&nbsp;Simon Dalle Piagge ,&nbsp;Vincent Jaulin ,&nbsp;Jérôme Limido ,&nbsp;Anthony Collé ,&nbsp;Fabien Rondot","doi":"10.1016/j.dt.2025.04.003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>An analysis of the interaction mechanisms between a Shaped Charge Jet (SCJ) and a single Moving Plate (MP) is proposed in this article using both experimental and numerical approaches. First, an experimental set-up is presented. Four collision tests have been performed: two tests in Backward Moving Plate (BMP) configuration, where the plate moves in opposition to jet, and two tests in Forward Moving Plate (FMP) configuration, where the plate moves alongside the jet. Based on the virtual origin approximation, a methodology (the Virtual Origin Method, VOM) is developed to extract quantities from the X-ray images, which serve as comparative data. <span><math><mrow><mi>γ</mi><mtext>SPH</mtext></mrow></math></span> simulations are carried out to complete the analysis, as they well capture the disturbance dynamics observed in the experiments. Based on these complementary experimental and numerical results, a new physical description is proposed through a detailed analysis of the interaction. It is shown that the SCJ/MP interaction is driven at first order by the contact geometry. Thus, BMP and FMP configurations do not generate the same disturbances because their local flow geometries are different. In the collision point frame of reference, the BMP flows in the same direction as the jet, causing its overall deflection. On the contrary, the FMP flow opposes that of the jet leading to an alternative creation of fragments and ligaments. An in-depth study, using the VOM shows that deflection angles, fragment-ligament creation frequencies, and deflection velocities evolve as the interaction progresses through slower jet elements.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":58209,"journal":{"name":"Defence Technology(防务技术)","volume":"50 ","pages":"Pages 126-140"},"PeriodicalIF":5.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Defence Technology(防务技术)","FirstCategoryId":"1087","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2214914725001199","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

An analysis of the interaction mechanisms between a Shaped Charge Jet (SCJ) and a single Moving Plate (MP) is proposed in this article using both experimental and numerical approaches. First, an experimental set-up is presented. Four collision tests have been performed: two tests in Backward Moving Plate (BMP) configuration, where the plate moves in opposition to jet, and two tests in Forward Moving Plate (FMP) configuration, where the plate moves alongside the jet. Based on the virtual origin approximation, a methodology (the Virtual Origin Method, VOM) is developed to extract quantities from the X-ray images, which serve as comparative data. γSPH simulations are carried out to complete the analysis, as they well capture the disturbance dynamics observed in the experiments. Based on these complementary experimental and numerical results, a new physical description is proposed through a detailed analysis of the interaction. It is shown that the SCJ/MP interaction is driven at first order by the contact geometry. Thus, BMP and FMP configurations do not generate the same disturbances because their local flow geometries are different. In the collision point frame of reference, the BMP flows in the same direction as the jet, causing its overall deflection. On the contrary, the FMP flow opposes that of the jet leading to an alternative creation of fragments and ligaments. An in-depth study, using the VOM shows that deflection angles, fragment-ligament creation frequencies, and deflection velocities evolve as the interaction progresses through slower jet elements.
聚能射流与单一ERA运动板相互作用的实验与数值研究
本文采用实验和数值方法分析了聚能射流与单运动板的相互作用机理。首先,提出了一个实验装置。已经进行了四次碰撞测试:两次测试是在向后移动板块(BMP)配置中,板块与射流相反移动;两次测试是在向前移动板块(FMP)配置中,板块与射流一起移动。基于虚拟原点近似,提出了一种从x射线图像中提取量作为比较数据的方法(虚拟原点法,VOM)。为了完成分析,进行了γ - sph模拟,因为它们很好地捕获了实验中观察到的扰动动力学。基于这些互补的实验和数值结果,通过对相互作用的详细分析,提出了一种新的物理描述。结果表明,SCJ/MP相互作用在一阶上受接触几何形状的驱动。因此,BMP和FMP结构不会产生相同的扰动,因为它们的局部流动几何形状不同。在碰撞点参照系中,BMP与射流沿同一方向流动,导致其整体偏转。相反,FMP流动与射流相反,导致碎片和韧带的形成。一项使用VOM的深入研究表明,偏转角度、碎片-韧带形成频率和偏转速度随着较慢的射流元件相互作用的进展而变化。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Defence Technology(防务技术)
Defence Technology(防务技术) Mechanical Engineering, Control and Systems Engineering, Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering
CiteScore
8.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
728
审稿时长
25 days
期刊介绍: Defence Technology, a peer reviewed journal, is published monthly and aims to become the best international academic exchange platform for the research related to defence technology. It publishes original research papers having direct bearing on defence, with a balanced coverage on analytical, experimental, numerical simulation and applied investigations. It covers various disciplines of science, technology and engineering.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信