Does behaviour matters the most in improving urban immunization coverage: exploring behavioural barriers in northern states of India

IF 2.2 Q3 IMMUNOLOGY
Pritu Dhalaria , Ayushi Agrawal , Jaideep Kumar , Ajeet Kumar Singh , Ashish Maurya , Syed Hassan , Bhupendra Tripathi , Arindam Ray , Sanjay Kapur
{"title":"Does behaviour matters the most in improving urban immunization coverage: exploring behavioural barriers in northern states of India","authors":"Pritu Dhalaria ,&nbsp;Ayushi Agrawal ,&nbsp;Jaideep Kumar ,&nbsp;Ajeet Kumar Singh ,&nbsp;Ashish Maurya ,&nbsp;Syed Hassan ,&nbsp;Bhupendra Tripathi ,&nbsp;Arindam Ray ,&nbsp;Sanjay Kapur","doi":"10.1016/j.jvacx.2025.100702","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Immunization is a crucial public health achievement, yet achieving equitable coverage remains challenging in countries like India. Despite India's notable progress in its Universal Immunization Program (UIP), urban-rural discrepancies persist, especially in densely populated states like Bihar and Uttar Pradesh, with urban areas experiencing slower improvement in coverage.</div></div><div><h3>Data &amp; methodology</h3><div>This study, conducted in Bihar and Uttar Pradesh, aimed to explore behavioural and social determinants affecting immunization uptake in urban areas. Based on the WHO's Behavioural and Social Drivers of Vaccination (BeSD) model, a comprehensive baseline situation analysis, including 34 in-depth interviews and 27 focus group discussions, was conducted in 12 districts of Bihar and Uttar Pradesh. The assessment covered the perceptions of caregivers, healthcare providers, and key immunization stakeholders.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Findings are categorized within the BeSD model's four domains: Thinking and Feeling, Social Processes, Motivation, and Practical Issues. In the thinking and feeling domain, perceived understanding gaps, the need for awareness, and the role of mass media and social networks emerged as key themes. Social processes illuminate gender dynamics, the dominance of decision-making by male and elderly members, and the impact of domestic violence on vaccination choices. Motivational factors include concerns about vaccine quality, fear of adverse events, and the influence of religious leaders. Practical issues encompass distrust of healthcare personnel, the timing of vaccination sessions, and infrastructural.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>The study reveals multifaceted challenges, highlighting the need for targeted urban-specific strategies to address social and behavioural barriers, enhance awareness, and improve infrastructure in urban immunization programs.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":43021,"journal":{"name":"Vaccine: X","volume":"26 ","pages":"Article 100702"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Vaccine: X","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2590136225000968","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"IMMUNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Immunization is a crucial public health achievement, yet achieving equitable coverage remains challenging in countries like India. Despite India's notable progress in its Universal Immunization Program (UIP), urban-rural discrepancies persist, especially in densely populated states like Bihar and Uttar Pradesh, with urban areas experiencing slower improvement in coverage.

Data & methodology

This study, conducted in Bihar and Uttar Pradesh, aimed to explore behavioural and social determinants affecting immunization uptake in urban areas. Based on the WHO's Behavioural and Social Drivers of Vaccination (BeSD) model, a comprehensive baseline situation analysis, including 34 in-depth interviews and 27 focus group discussions, was conducted in 12 districts of Bihar and Uttar Pradesh. The assessment covered the perceptions of caregivers, healthcare providers, and key immunization stakeholders.

Results

Findings are categorized within the BeSD model's four domains: Thinking and Feeling, Social Processes, Motivation, and Practical Issues. In the thinking and feeling domain, perceived understanding gaps, the need for awareness, and the role of mass media and social networks emerged as key themes. Social processes illuminate gender dynamics, the dominance of decision-making by male and elderly members, and the impact of domestic violence on vaccination choices. Motivational factors include concerns about vaccine quality, fear of adverse events, and the influence of religious leaders. Practical issues encompass distrust of healthcare personnel, the timing of vaccination sessions, and infrastructural.

Conclusion

The study reveals multifaceted challenges, highlighting the need for targeted urban-specific strategies to address social and behavioural barriers, enhance awareness, and improve infrastructure in urban immunization programs.
在提高城市免疫覆盖率方面,行为是否最重要:探索印度北部各邦的行为障碍
免疫接种是一项重要的公共卫生成就,但在印度等国家实现公平覆盖仍然具有挑战性。尽管印度在普及免疫规划(UIP)方面取得了显著进展,但城乡差距仍然存在,特别是在比哈尔邦和北方邦等人口稠密的邦,城市地区的覆盖率改善速度较慢。数据,这项研究在比哈尔邦和北方邦进行,旨在探索影响城市地区免疫接种的行为和社会决定因素。根据世卫组织疫苗接种的行为和社会驱动因素(BeSD)模型,在比哈尔邦和北方邦的12个县进行了全面的基线情况分析,包括34次深度访谈和27次焦点小组讨论。评估涵盖了护理人员、卫生保健提供者和主要免疫利益攸关方的看法。结果:研究结果分为四个领域:思考和感觉、社会过程、动机和实际问题。在思考和感觉领域,感知到的理解差距、意识的需要以及大众媒体和社交网络的作用成为关键主题。社会进程阐明了性别动态、男性和老年成员在决策中的主导地位以及家庭暴力对疫苗接种选择的影响。动机因素包括对疫苗质量的担忧、对不良事件的恐惧以及宗教领袖的影响。实际问题包括对卫生保健人员的不信任、疫苗接种的时间安排和基础设施。结论该研究揭示了多方面的挑战,强调需要有针对性的城市特定战略来解决社会和行为障碍,提高认识,改善城市免疫规划的基础设施。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Vaccine: X
Vaccine: X Multiple-
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
2.60%
发文量
102
审稿时长
13 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信