Quantification of collagen matrix deposition in 2D cell cultures: a comparative study of existing assays

IF 6 2区 医学 Q2 MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS
Syuzanna Hambardzumyan , Jennifer Y. Kasper , Aránzazu del Campo
{"title":"Quantification of collagen matrix deposition in 2D cell cultures: a comparative study of existing assays","authors":"Syuzanna Hambardzumyan ,&nbsp;Jennifer Y. Kasper ,&nbsp;Aránzazu del Campo","doi":"10.1016/j.bioadv.2025.214436","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Collagen matrix deposition is an important biomarker to predict the regenerative capacity of new biomaterials or the therapeutic potential of new drugs in collagen-associated diseases. Several methods for the quantification of matrix collagen in tissue samples are established, e.g., Picro-Sirius red assay, hydroxyproline assay, antibody-based assays, or the 3,4-DHPAA-based assay. These methods have been extended to quantify deposited collagen in <em>in vitro</em> cell culture models, although their applicability has been questioned due to the much lower concentration and eventually lower relative abundance of deposited collagen in cell cultures than in tissue. Here we compare the performance of the above-mentioned methods for the quantification of deposited matrix collagen in 2D cell cultures under different conditions: culture time, addition of collagen deposition-stimulating molecules, and post-culture processing step (decellularization). We show that the available methods can deliver accurate results within different experimental windows. We provide a comprehensive analysis of the relevant experimental parameters that influence the assay, and the sensitivity limits for the different methods, as well as the involved effort. In a comparative table, we provide guidance for the selection of the most appropriate collagen quantification assay for different culture conditions.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":51111,"journal":{"name":"Materials Science & Engineering C-Materials for Biological Applications","volume":"178 ","pages":"Article 214436"},"PeriodicalIF":6.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Materials Science & Engineering C-Materials for Biological Applications","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772950825002638","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Collagen matrix deposition is an important biomarker to predict the regenerative capacity of new biomaterials or the therapeutic potential of new drugs in collagen-associated diseases. Several methods for the quantification of matrix collagen in tissue samples are established, e.g., Picro-Sirius red assay, hydroxyproline assay, antibody-based assays, or the 3,4-DHPAA-based assay. These methods have been extended to quantify deposited collagen in in vitro cell culture models, although their applicability has been questioned due to the much lower concentration and eventually lower relative abundance of deposited collagen in cell cultures than in tissue. Here we compare the performance of the above-mentioned methods for the quantification of deposited matrix collagen in 2D cell cultures under different conditions: culture time, addition of collagen deposition-stimulating molecules, and post-culture processing step (decellularization). We show that the available methods can deliver accurate results within different experimental windows. We provide a comprehensive analysis of the relevant experimental parameters that influence the assay, and the sensitivity limits for the different methods, as well as the involved effort. In a comparative table, we provide guidance for the selection of the most appropriate collagen quantification assay for different culture conditions.
二维细胞培养中胶原基质沉积的定量:现有测定方法的比较研究
胶原基质沉积是预测新生物材料再生能力或新药物治疗胶原相关疾病潜力的重要生物标志物。建立了几种定量组织样品中基质胶原蛋白的方法,例如,微天狼星红测定法、羟脯氨酸测定法、基于抗体的测定法或基于3,4- dhpaa的测定法。这些方法已经扩展到定量体外细胞培养模型中沉积的胶原蛋白,尽管它们的适用性受到质疑,因为细胞培养中沉积的胶原蛋白的浓度和最终相对丰度比组织中低得多。在此,我们比较了上述方法在不同条件下(培养时间、胶原沉积刺激分子的添加和培养后处理步骤(脱细胞))对二维细胞培养中沉积基质胶原的定量效果。我们证明了现有的方法可以在不同的实验窗口内提供准确的结果。我们对影响测定的相关实验参数、不同方法的灵敏度限制以及所涉及的工作量进行了全面分析。在比较表中,我们为不同培养条件下选择最合适的胶原定量测定方法提供了指导。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
17.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
501
审稿时长
27 days
期刊介绍: Biomaterials Advances, previously known as Materials Science and Engineering: C-Materials for Biological Applications (P-ISSN: 0928-4931, E-ISSN: 1873-0191). Includes topics at the interface of the biomedical sciences and materials engineering. These topics include: • Bioinspired and biomimetic materials for medical applications • Materials of biological origin for medical applications • Materials for "active" medical applications • Self-assembling and self-healing materials for medical applications • "Smart" (i.e., stimulus-response) materials for medical applications • Ceramic, metallic, polymeric, and composite materials for medical applications • Materials for in vivo sensing • Materials for in vivo imaging • Materials for delivery of pharmacologic agents and vaccines • Novel approaches for characterizing and modeling materials for medical applications Manuscripts on biological topics without a materials science component, or manuscripts on materials science without biological applications, will not be considered for publication in Materials Science and Engineering C. New submissions are first assessed for language, scope and originality (plagiarism check) and can be desk rejected before review if they need English language improvements, are out of scope or present excessive duplication with published sources. Biomaterials Advances sits within Elsevier''s biomaterials science portfolio alongside Biomaterials, Materials Today Bio and Biomaterials and Biosystems. As part of the broader Materials Today family, Biomaterials Advances offers authors rigorous peer review, rapid decisions, and high visibility. We look forward to receiving your submissions!
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信