Shuyuan Liu , Tianyu Shu , Yabo Zhao , Feng Zhao , Facheng Song , Xiaoru Hou , Yongquan Zhang , Chaozong Liu , Shuguang Liu , Changning Sun , Dichen Li , Lei Shi , Ling Wang
{"title":"Properties investigation on 3D-printed polyetherketoneketone (PEKK) – a proper candidate for bone replacement","authors":"Shuyuan Liu , Tianyu Shu , Yabo Zhao , Feng Zhao , Facheng Song , Xiaoru Hou , Yongquan Zhang , Chaozong Liu , Shuguang Liu , Changning Sun , Dichen Li , Lei Shi , Ling Wang","doi":"10.1016/j.bioadv.2025.214442","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Polyetherketoneketone (PEKK) has emerged as a highly promising material for bone substitutes due to its superior mechanical properties, biocompatibility, and patient-specific design capabilities. This study systematically investigated the mechanical properties of fused filament fabrication (FFF) 3D-printed PEKK in various printing orientations and found that PEKK specimens exhibited three times the tensile strength and flexural strength in the <em>Z</em>-axis compared to polyetheretherketone (PEEK). Surface assessments revealed that PEKK surfaces had greater roughness and wettability than those of PEEK under the same 3D printing conditions. In vitro biological evaluations of cell morphology and proliferation on PEKK surfaces demonstrated superior cell adhesion and cell proliferation compared to those of PEEK. Moreover, animal tests were conducted to assess their osseointegration performance followed by CT scanning, histological studies, and push-out tests. The CT scanning and histological results agree well with each other on the better bone quality and quantity surrounding the PEKK implants than those of the PEEK implants, which was consistent with the higher pushing-out force achieved in PEKK implant than those of the PEEK implant. In conclusion, the FFF 3D-printed PEKK is an ideal bone substitute material with outstanding mechanical and biological properties.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":51111,"journal":{"name":"Materials Science & Engineering C-Materials for Biological Applications","volume":"178 ","pages":"Article 214442"},"PeriodicalIF":6.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Materials Science & Engineering C-Materials for Biological Applications","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772950825002699","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Polyetherketoneketone (PEKK) has emerged as a highly promising material for bone substitutes due to its superior mechanical properties, biocompatibility, and patient-specific design capabilities. This study systematically investigated the mechanical properties of fused filament fabrication (FFF) 3D-printed PEKK in various printing orientations and found that PEKK specimens exhibited three times the tensile strength and flexural strength in the Z-axis compared to polyetheretherketone (PEEK). Surface assessments revealed that PEKK surfaces had greater roughness and wettability than those of PEEK under the same 3D printing conditions. In vitro biological evaluations of cell morphology and proliferation on PEKK surfaces demonstrated superior cell adhesion and cell proliferation compared to those of PEEK. Moreover, animal tests were conducted to assess their osseointegration performance followed by CT scanning, histological studies, and push-out tests. The CT scanning and histological results agree well with each other on the better bone quality and quantity surrounding the PEKK implants than those of the PEEK implants, which was consistent with the higher pushing-out force achieved in PEKK implant than those of the PEEK implant. In conclusion, the FFF 3D-printed PEKK is an ideal bone substitute material with outstanding mechanical and biological properties.
期刊介绍:
Biomaterials Advances, previously known as Materials Science and Engineering: C-Materials for Biological Applications (P-ISSN: 0928-4931, E-ISSN: 1873-0191). Includes topics at the interface of the biomedical sciences and materials engineering. These topics include:
• Bioinspired and biomimetic materials for medical applications
• Materials of biological origin for medical applications
• Materials for "active" medical applications
• Self-assembling and self-healing materials for medical applications
• "Smart" (i.e., stimulus-response) materials for medical applications
• Ceramic, metallic, polymeric, and composite materials for medical applications
• Materials for in vivo sensing
• Materials for in vivo imaging
• Materials for delivery of pharmacologic agents and vaccines
• Novel approaches for characterizing and modeling materials for medical applications
Manuscripts on biological topics without a materials science component, or manuscripts on materials science without biological applications, will not be considered for publication in Materials Science and Engineering C. New submissions are first assessed for language, scope and originality (plagiarism check) and can be desk rejected before review if they need English language improvements, are out of scope or present excessive duplication with published sources.
Biomaterials Advances sits within Elsevier''s biomaterials science portfolio alongside Biomaterials, Materials Today Bio and Biomaterials and Biosystems. As part of the broader Materials Today family, Biomaterials Advances offers authors rigorous peer review, rapid decisions, and high visibility. We look forward to receiving your submissions!