Properties investigation on 3D-printed polyetherketoneketone (PEKK) – a proper candidate for bone replacement

IF 6 2区 医学 Q2 MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS
Shuyuan Liu , Tianyu Shu , Yabo Zhao , Feng Zhao , Facheng Song , Xiaoru Hou , Yongquan Zhang , Chaozong Liu , Shuguang Liu , Changning Sun , Dichen Li , Lei Shi , Ling Wang
{"title":"Properties investigation on 3D-printed polyetherketoneketone (PEKK) – a proper candidate for bone replacement","authors":"Shuyuan Liu ,&nbsp;Tianyu Shu ,&nbsp;Yabo Zhao ,&nbsp;Feng Zhao ,&nbsp;Facheng Song ,&nbsp;Xiaoru Hou ,&nbsp;Yongquan Zhang ,&nbsp;Chaozong Liu ,&nbsp;Shuguang Liu ,&nbsp;Changning Sun ,&nbsp;Dichen Li ,&nbsp;Lei Shi ,&nbsp;Ling Wang","doi":"10.1016/j.bioadv.2025.214442","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Polyetherketoneketone (PEKK) has emerged as a highly promising material for bone substitutes due to its superior mechanical properties, biocompatibility, and patient-specific design capabilities. This study systematically investigated the mechanical properties of fused filament fabrication (FFF) 3D-printed PEKK in various printing orientations and found that PEKK specimens exhibited three times the tensile strength and flexural strength in the <em>Z</em>-axis compared to polyetheretherketone (PEEK). Surface assessments revealed that PEKK surfaces had greater roughness and wettability than those of PEEK under the same 3D printing conditions. In vitro biological evaluations of cell morphology and proliferation on PEKK surfaces demonstrated superior cell adhesion and cell proliferation compared to those of PEEK. Moreover, animal tests were conducted to assess their osseointegration performance followed by CT scanning, histological studies, and push-out tests. The CT scanning and histological results agree well with each other on the better bone quality and quantity surrounding the PEKK implants than those of the PEEK implants, which was consistent with the higher pushing-out force achieved in PEKK implant than those of the PEEK implant. In conclusion, the FFF 3D-printed PEKK is an ideal bone substitute material with outstanding mechanical and biological properties.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":51111,"journal":{"name":"Materials Science & Engineering C-Materials for Biological Applications","volume":"178 ","pages":"Article 214442"},"PeriodicalIF":6.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Materials Science & Engineering C-Materials for Biological Applications","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772950825002699","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Polyetherketoneketone (PEKK) has emerged as a highly promising material for bone substitutes due to its superior mechanical properties, biocompatibility, and patient-specific design capabilities. This study systematically investigated the mechanical properties of fused filament fabrication (FFF) 3D-printed PEKK in various printing orientations and found that PEKK specimens exhibited three times the tensile strength and flexural strength in the Z-axis compared to polyetheretherketone (PEEK). Surface assessments revealed that PEKK surfaces had greater roughness and wettability than those of PEEK under the same 3D printing conditions. In vitro biological evaluations of cell morphology and proliferation on PEKK surfaces demonstrated superior cell adhesion and cell proliferation compared to those of PEEK. Moreover, animal tests were conducted to assess their osseointegration performance followed by CT scanning, histological studies, and push-out tests. The CT scanning and histological results agree well with each other on the better bone quality and quantity surrounding the PEKK implants than those of the PEEK implants, which was consistent with the higher pushing-out force achieved in PEKK implant than those of the PEEK implant. In conclusion, the FFF 3D-printed PEKK is an ideal bone substitute material with outstanding mechanical and biological properties.
3d打印聚醚酮酮(PEKK)的性能研究-一种合适的骨替代物
聚醚酮酮(PEKK)由于其优越的机械性能、生物相容性和患者特异性设计能力,已成为一种非常有前途的骨替代品材料。本研究系统地研究了熔融长丝制造(FFF) 3d打印PEKK在不同打印方向上的力学性能,发现PEKK样品在z轴上的拉伸强度和弯曲强度是聚醚醚酮(PEEK)的三倍。表面评估显示,在相同的3D打印条件下,PEKK表面比PEEK表面具有更高的粗糙度和润湿性。PEKK表面的细胞形态和增殖的体外生物学评价表明,与PEEK相比,PEKK表面的细胞粘附和细胞增殖能力更强。此外,在CT扫描、组织学研究和推出试验之后,进行了动物实验来评估它们的骨整合性能。CT扫描和组织学结果吻合良好,PEKK种植体周围骨质量和数量优于PEEK种植体,这与PEKK种植体比PEEK种植体获得更高的推出力是一致的。综上所述,FFF 3d打印PEKK是一种理想的骨替代材料,具有优异的力学和生物学性能。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
17.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
501
审稿时长
27 days
期刊介绍: Biomaterials Advances, previously known as Materials Science and Engineering: C-Materials for Biological Applications (P-ISSN: 0928-4931, E-ISSN: 1873-0191). Includes topics at the interface of the biomedical sciences and materials engineering. These topics include: • Bioinspired and biomimetic materials for medical applications • Materials of biological origin for medical applications • Materials for "active" medical applications • Self-assembling and self-healing materials for medical applications • "Smart" (i.e., stimulus-response) materials for medical applications • Ceramic, metallic, polymeric, and composite materials for medical applications • Materials for in vivo sensing • Materials for in vivo imaging • Materials for delivery of pharmacologic agents and vaccines • Novel approaches for characterizing and modeling materials for medical applications Manuscripts on biological topics without a materials science component, or manuscripts on materials science without biological applications, will not be considered for publication in Materials Science and Engineering C. New submissions are first assessed for language, scope and originality (plagiarism check) and can be desk rejected before review if they need English language improvements, are out of scope or present excessive duplication with published sources. Biomaterials Advances sits within Elsevier''s biomaterials science portfolio alongside Biomaterials, Materials Today Bio and Biomaterials and Biosystems. As part of the broader Materials Today family, Biomaterials Advances offers authors rigorous peer review, rapid decisions, and high visibility. We look forward to receiving your submissions!
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信