Nano chitosan to sludge ratio modulates fouling mitigation in electric field-assisted membrane bioreactors

IF 7.1 2区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 BIOTECHNOLOGY & APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY
Farahnaz Karamouz , Hossein Hazrati , Ali Baradar Khoshfetrat
{"title":"Nano chitosan to sludge ratio modulates fouling mitigation in electric field-assisted membrane bioreactors","authors":"Farahnaz Karamouz ,&nbsp;Hossein Hazrati ,&nbsp;Ali Baradar Khoshfetrat","doi":"10.1016/j.eti.2025.104418","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Membrane fouling poses a significant challenge in applying membrane bioreactors (MBRs), despite advantages of the MBRs, such as superior effluent quality, energy efficiency, and compact design for wastewater treatment. This study explores the relationship between nano chitosan-sludge ratios and fouling control, presenting innovative solutions to this issue. The laboratory-scale aerobic electric field-assisted MBR (E-MBR) consisted of four electrodes (two pairs of stainless steel plates) submerged in the mixed liquor of a flat membrane bioreactor were used. Various chitosan-sludge ratios (0, 0.2, 0.3, and 0.4 g/L) were tested with a solid retention time (SRT) of 25 days and a hydraulic retention time (HRT) of 6 h. Long-term experiments revealed that a nano chitosan dosage of 0.3 g/L (E-MBR0.3) was the optimal configuration, achieving an impressive 100 % membrane recovery ratio after 62 days of operation. This approach successfully eliminated pore blockages caused by small sludge particles, decreased the concentrations of proteins and humic acids, and improved effluent quality. E-MBR0.3 enhanced the performance index by 79 % compared to the control MBR while displaying minimal fouling and a favorable sludge particle size distribution. The results underline the economic and operational advantages of reduced cleaning frequency and maintenance, paving the way for cost-effective and sustainable wastewater treatment. By leveraging the synergistic effects of electric fields and appropriate nano chitosan concentration, this study establishes a new benchmark for advancing MBR technology, offering robust solutions to address water scarcity and environmental challenges.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":11725,"journal":{"name":"Environmental Technology & Innovation","volume":"40 ","pages":"Article 104418"},"PeriodicalIF":7.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Environmental Technology & Innovation","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352186425004043","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BIOTECHNOLOGY & APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Membrane fouling poses a significant challenge in applying membrane bioreactors (MBRs), despite advantages of the MBRs, such as superior effluent quality, energy efficiency, and compact design for wastewater treatment. This study explores the relationship between nano chitosan-sludge ratios and fouling control, presenting innovative solutions to this issue. The laboratory-scale aerobic electric field-assisted MBR (E-MBR) consisted of four electrodes (two pairs of stainless steel plates) submerged in the mixed liquor of a flat membrane bioreactor were used. Various chitosan-sludge ratios (0, 0.2, 0.3, and 0.4 g/L) were tested with a solid retention time (SRT) of 25 days and a hydraulic retention time (HRT) of 6 h. Long-term experiments revealed that a nano chitosan dosage of 0.3 g/L (E-MBR0.3) was the optimal configuration, achieving an impressive 100 % membrane recovery ratio after 62 days of operation. This approach successfully eliminated pore blockages caused by small sludge particles, decreased the concentrations of proteins and humic acids, and improved effluent quality. E-MBR0.3 enhanced the performance index by 79 % compared to the control MBR while displaying minimal fouling and a favorable sludge particle size distribution. The results underline the economic and operational advantages of reduced cleaning frequency and maintenance, paving the way for cost-effective and sustainable wastewater treatment. By leveraging the synergistic effects of electric fields and appropriate nano chitosan concentration, this study establishes a new benchmark for advancing MBR technology, offering robust solutions to address water scarcity and environmental challenges.
纳米壳聚糖与污泥比调节电场辅助膜生物反应器的污染缓解
尽管膜生物反应器(mbr)具有优异的出水质量、能源效率和紧凑的污水处理设计等优点,但膜污染对应用膜生物反应器(mbr)提出了重大挑战。本研究探讨了纳米壳聚糖-污泥比与污染控制之间的关系,并提出了创新的解决方案。采用实验室规模的好氧电场辅助MBR (E-MBR),将4个电极(2对不锈钢板)浸泡在平板膜生物反应器的混合液中。在固体滞留时间(SRT)为25天,水力滞留时间(HRT)为6 h的条件下,测试了不同壳聚糖-污泥比(0、0.2、0.3和0.4 g/L)。长期实验表明,纳米壳聚糖用量为0.3 g/L (E-MBR0.3)是最佳配置,运行62天后膜回收率达到100% %。该方法成功地消除了由小污泥颗粒引起的孔隙堵塞,降低了蛋白质和腐植酸的浓度,并改善了出水质量。与对照MBR相比,E-MBR0.3的性能指标提高了79 %,同时表现出最小的污垢和良好的污泥粒径分布。结果强调了减少清洁频率和维护的经济和操作优势,为具有成本效益和可持续的废水处理铺平了道路。通过利用电场和适当的纳米壳聚糖浓度的协同效应,本研究为推进MBR技术建立了新的基准,为解决水资源短缺和环境挑战提供了强有力的解决方案。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Environmental Technology & Innovation
Environmental Technology & Innovation Environmental Science-General Environmental Science
CiteScore
14.00
自引率
4.20%
发文量
435
审稿时长
74 days
期刊介绍: Environmental Technology & Innovation adopts a challenge-oriented approach to solutions by integrating natural sciences to promote a sustainable future. The journal aims to foster the creation and development of innovative products, technologies, and ideas that enhance the environment, with impacts across soil, air, water, and food in rural and urban areas. As a platform for disseminating scientific evidence for environmental protection and sustainable development, the journal emphasizes fundamental science, methodologies, tools, techniques, and policy considerations. It emphasizes the importance of science and technology in environmental benefits, including smarter, cleaner technologies for environmental protection, more efficient resource processing methods, and the evidence supporting their effectiveness.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信