Developing clinical practice guidelines in paediatric and adolescent oncofertility.

IF 4.1
Harjot Kaur, Michael Assis, Apoorva Bhargava, Zobaida Edib, Diana Navarro-Perez, Devini Ameratunga, Antoinette Anazodo, David Handelsman, Shital Julania, Maria McCarthy, Michelle Peate, Laura Raiti, Genia Rozen, Patrick Western, Yasmin Jayasinghe
{"title":"Developing clinical practice guidelines in paediatric and adolescent oncofertility.","authors":"Harjot Kaur, Michael Assis, Apoorva Bhargava, Zobaida Edib, Diana Navarro-Perez, Devini Ameratunga, Antoinette Anazodo, David Handelsman, Shital Julania, Maria McCarthy, Michelle Peate, Laura Raiti, Genia Rozen, Patrick Western, Yasmin Jayasinghe","doi":"10.1016/j.bpobgyn.2025.102637","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Recent international guidelines in child, adolescent, and young adult (CAYA) oncofertility uniformly recommend fertility discussion before cancer treatment, and individualised decision-making for fertility preservation procedures. Yet significant disparities remain across the globe. Various aspects of oncofertility care are in different stages of translation and the boundaries between experimental, innovative and established techniques are not always clear to patients, clinicians and policymakers. This poses barriers for implementation of high-quality care and for the allocation of resources required. International and national guidelines play a key role in promoting equitable care. In 2019, members of the Australian New Zealand Consortium in CAYA Oncofertility (ANZCO) called for national guidelines to standardise care and improve connectedness amongst Australian New Zealand Haematology Oncology Group (ANZCHOG) centres. A clearer understanding of the similarities and differences amongst key guidelines was deemed useful for closing knowledge gaps in the local context and identifying the priorities of key stakeholders with respect to guideline development. This paper provides an overview of CAYA oncofertility guidance from six peak bodies from four continents (Australia, Europe, North America, Asia). A review of recommendations and levels of evidence followed by a Delphi consensus of ANZCO members to develop priority questions is described. ANZCHOG guidelines tailored to the local CAYA context were deemed a high priority, in order to provide a common purpose, direction and governance for providers of paediatric care.</p>","PeriodicalId":93895,"journal":{"name":"Best practice & research. Clinical obstetrics & gynaecology","volume":"102 ","pages":"102637"},"PeriodicalIF":4.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Best practice & research. Clinical obstetrics & gynaecology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bpobgyn.2025.102637","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/7/11 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Recent international guidelines in child, adolescent, and young adult (CAYA) oncofertility uniformly recommend fertility discussion before cancer treatment, and individualised decision-making for fertility preservation procedures. Yet significant disparities remain across the globe. Various aspects of oncofertility care are in different stages of translation and the boundaries between experimental, innovative and established techniques are not always clear to patients, clinicians and policymakers. This poses barriers for implementation of high-quality care and for the allocation of resources required. International and national guidelines play a key role in promoting equitable care. In 2019, members of the Australian New Zealand Consortium in CAYA Oncofertility (ANZCO) called for national guidelines to standardise care and improve connectedness amongst Australian New Zealand Haematology Oncology Group (ANZCHOG) centres. A clearer understanding of the similarities and differences amongst key guidelines was deemed useful for closing knowledge gaps in the local context and identifying the priorities of key stakeholders with respect to guideline development. This paper provides an overview of CAYA oncofertility guidance from six peak bodies from four continents (Australia, Europe, North America, Asia). A review of recommendations and levels of evidence followed by a Delphi consensus of ANZCO members to develop priority questions is described. ANZCHOG guidelines tailored to the local CAYA context were deemed a high priority, in order to provide a common purpose, direction and governance for providers of paediatric care.

制定儿科和青少年肿瘤生育的临床实践指南。
最近关于儿童、青少年和年轻人(CAYA)癌性生育的国际指南一致建议在癌症治疗前进行生育讨论,并对生育保留程序进行个性化决策。然而,全球范围内仍存在巨大差异。不孕不育治疗的各个方面正处于不同的转化阶段,患者、临床医生和政策制定者并不总是清楚实验性、创新性和既定技术之间的界限。这对实施高质量护理和分配所需资源构成了障碍。国际和国家准则在促进公平护理方面发挥着关键作用。2019年,澳大利亚新西兰CAYA肿瘤联合会(ANZCO)的成员呼吁制定国家指南,以标准化护理并改善澳大利亚新西兰血液学肿瘤集团(ANZCHOG)中心之间的连通性。更清楚地了解关键指南之间的相同点和不同点被认为有助于缩小当地背景下的知识差距,并确定关键利益攸关方在指南制定方面的优先事项。本文概述了来自四大洲(澳大利亚、欧洲、北美、亚洲)的六个高峰机构的CAYA肿瘤生育指南。描述了对建议和证据水平的审查,随后是ANZCO成员的德尔菲共识,以制定优先问题。ANZCHOG针对当地CAYA环境量身定制的指南被认为是高度优先的,以便为儿科护理提供者提供共同的目标、方向和治理。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信