Cannabis use frequency is associated with emotion dysregulation among persons receiving long-term opioid therapy for chronic pain: A psychophysiological study.

IF 3.6
Drug and alcohol dependence Pub Date : 2025-10-01 Epub Date: 2025-08-05 DOI:10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2025.112812
Joao P De Aquino, Gabriel P A Costa, Julio C Nunes, Justin Hudak, Madeleine Odette, Eric L Garland
{"title":"Cannabis use frequency is associated with emotion dysregulation among persons receiving long-term opioid therapy for chronic pain: A psychophysiological study.","authors":"Joao P De Aquino, Gabriel P A Costa, Julio C Nunes, Justin Hudak, Madeleine Odette, Eric L Garland","doi":"10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2025.112812","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>With evolving legislation and attitudes towards cannabis in the United States, individuals receiving long-term opioid therapy (LTOT) for chronic pain increasingly use cannabis intending to relieve pain and reduce opioid consumption. Although they might also use cannabis to compensate for emotion dysregulation, the role of emotion regulation capacity in this population's patterns of cannabis use has not been investigated. This study examined whether deficits in emotion regulation capacity, an endophenotype assessed via psychophysiological measures, are associated with more frequent cannabis use among individuals receiving LTOT for chronic pain.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We analyzed data from 104 participants (mean age=51.12 years; 68.35 % female; 88.46 % White) receiving LTOT for chronic pain. Cannabis use frequency was quantified by days of use over 90 days. Emotion regulation capacity was indexed using skin conductance response (SCR) and corrugator electromyography (fEMG) during passive viewing or cognitive reappraisal of negative stimuli. Pain severity was assessed using the Brief Pain Inventory.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Smaller reductions in SCR (β=-0.018, p < 0.001) and corrugator fEMG (β=-9.59, p < 0.001) difference scores, signifying weaker emotion regulation capacity, were associated with more days of cannabis use. Pain severity was not significantly associated with cannabis use frequency (β=0.026, p = 0.370).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>These findings suggest that impaired emotion regulation capacity might be a more critical endophenotype associated with frequent cannabis use than pain severity and support the notion that cannabis use might primarily modulate affective processes in this population. These results highlight the potential for targeted emotion regulation interventions to address heavy cannabis use among pain patients receiving LTOT.</p>","PeriodicalId":93983,"journal":{"name":"Drug and alcohol dependence","volume":"275 ","pages":"112812"},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12396927/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Drug and alcohol dependence","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2025.112812","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/8/5 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: With evolving legislation and attitudes towards cannabis in the United States, individuals receiving long-term opioid therapy (LTOT) for chronic pain increasingly use cannabis intending to relieve pain and reduce opioid consumption. Although they might also use cannabis to compensate for emotion dysregulation, the role of emotion regulation capacity in this population's patterns of cannabis use has not been investigated. This study examined whether deficits in emotion regulation capacity, an endophenotype assessed via psychophysiological measures, are associated with more frequent cannabis use among individuals receiving LTOT for chronic pain.

Methods: We analyzed data from 104 participants (mean age=51.12 years; 68.35 % female; 88.46 % White) receiving LTOT for chronic pain. Cannabis use frequency was quantified by days of use over 90 days. Emotion regulation capacity was indexed using skin conductance response (SCR) and corrugator electromyography (fEMG) during passive viewing or cognitive reappraisal of negative stimuli. Pain severity was assessed using the Brief Pain Inventory.

Results: Smaller reductions in SCR (β=-0.018, p < 0.001) and corrugator fEMG (β=-9.59, p < 0.001) difference scores, signifying weaker emotion regulation capacity, were associated with more days of cannabis use. Pain severity was not significantly associated with cannabis use frequency (β=0.026, p = 0.370).

Conclusions: These findings suggest that impaired emotion regulation capacity might be a more critical endophenotype associated with frequent cannabis use than pain severity and support the notion that cannabis use might primarily modulate affective processes in this population. These results highlight the potential for targeted emotion regulation interventions to address heavy cannabis use among pain patients receiving LTOT.

大麻使用频率与接受长期阿片类药物治疗慢性疼痛的人的情绪失调有关:一项心理生理学研究。
背景:随着美国对大麻的立法和态度的演变,接受长期阿片类药物治疗(LTOT)治疗慢性疼痛的个体越来越多地使用大麻来缓解疼痛和减少阿片类药物的消耗。虽然他们也可能使用大麻来补偿情绪失调,但情绪调节能力在这一人群使用大麻的模式中的作用尚未得到调查。这项研究调查了情绪调节能力的缺陷(一种通过心理生理学测量评估的内表型)是否与接受ltt治疗慢性疼痛的个体中更频繁地使用大麻有关。方法:我们分析了104名参与者的资料(平均年龄为51.12岁;女性占68.35%;88.46%白人患者接受LTOT治疗慢性疼痛。大麻使用频率以超过90天的使用天数来量化。采用皮肤电导反应(SCR)和瓦楞纸肌电图(fEMG)对消极刺激的被动观看或认知重评进行情绪调节能力指数。使用简短疼痛量表评估疼痛严重程度。结果:SCR降低幅度较小(β=-0.018, p)。结论:这些发现表明,与疼痛严重程度相比,情绪调节能力受损可能是与频繁使用大麻相关的更关键的内表型,并支持大麻使用可能主要调节该人群的情感过程的观点。这些结果强调了有针对性的情绪调节干预的潜力,以解决接受ltt的疼痛患者大量使用大麻的问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信