Caregiver Perspectives on Racism and Bias in Navigating the Care of Children with Long-Term Ventilation via Tracheostomy

IF 3.5 2区 医学 Q1 PEDIATRICS
Holly Hòa Võ MD, MPH, MSc, MA , Kareena Patel BA , Cyndy Snyder PhD , William N. Sveen MD MA , Marcia Hancock MPA, MSW, LCSW-C , Uchenna E. Anani MD , Renee D. Boss MD, MHS , Benjamin S. Wilfond MD
{"title":"Caregiver Perspectives on Racism and Bias in Navigating the Care of Children with Long-Term Ventilation via Tracheostomy","authors":"Holly Hòa Võ MD, MPH, MSc, MA ,&nbsp;Kareena Patel BA ,&nbsp;Cyndy Snyder PhD ,&nbsp;William N. Sveen MD MA ,&nbsp;Marcia Hancock MPA, MSW, LCSW-C ,&nbsp;Uchenna E. Anani MD ,&nbsp;Renee D. Boss MD, MHS ,&nbsp;Benjamin S. Wilfond MD","doi":"10.1016/j.jpeds.2025.114765","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><div>To explore caregiver experiences of racism and bias in navigating the care of children with long-term ventilation via a tracheostomy (LTV).</div></div><div><h3>Study design</h3><div>Qualitative study with semistructured interviews of caregivers for children who initiated LTV in the previous 5 years at 4 geographically distinct academic medical centers. An interview guide was developed and deployed to include domains about the decision-making process, interactions with medical teams, transition to home, and the care the child received.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Thirty-one families with children from racially and ethnically minoritized groups who initiated LTV were interviewed. About half of families described experiences in which racism or another form of bias affected how providers from medical teams interacted with them and their children. Four themes emerged regarding the types of biases that caregivers experienced and described: (1) race and ethnicity; (2) language; (3) socioeconomic status; and (4) caregiver's bedside presence. Caregivers also highlighted suggestions regarding how to support families from racial and ethnic groups that have been economically and socially marginalized in health systems, which include (1) resources for knowledge-building and decision-making; (2) increased representation of families from similar racial and ethnic backgrounds; and (3) increased provider empathy and positive messaging.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>For families from racial and ethnic minoritized groups, we found that racism and other biases may compound the challenges associated with LTV. The potential for racism and other biases highlights the need for targeted resources to support better those families pursuing LTV.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":54774,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Pediatrics","volume":"287 ","pages":"Article 114765"},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Pediatrics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0022347625003063","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PEDIATRICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective

To explore caregiver experiences of racism and bias in navigating the care of children with long-term ventilation via a tracheostomy (LTV).

Study design

Qualitative study with semistructured interviews of caregivers for children who initiated LTV in the previous 5 years at 4 geographically distinct academic medical centers. An interview guide was developed and deployed to include domains about the decision-making process, interactions with medical teams, transition to home, and the care the child received.

Results

Thirty-one families with children from racially and ethnically minoritized groups who initiated LTV were interviewed. About half of families described experiences in which racism or another form of bias affected how providers from medical teams interacted with them and their children. Four themes emerged regarding the types of biases that caregivers experienced and described: (1) race and ethnicity; (2) language; (3) socioeconomic status; and (4) caregiver's bedside presence. Caregivers also highlighted suggestions regarding how to support families from racial and ethnic groups that have been economically and socially marginalized in health systems, which include (1) resources for knowledge-building and decision-making; (2) increased representation of families from similar racial and ethnic backgrounds; and (3) increased provider empathy and positive messaging.

Conclusions

For families from racial and ethnic minoritized groups, we found that racism and other biases may compound the challenges associated with LTV. The potential for racism and other biases highlights the need for targeted resources to support better those families pursuing LTV.
照顾者对种族主义和偏见的观点在通过气管切开术进行长期通气的儿童的护理中。
目的:探讨种族歧视和偏见在指导气管造口术(LTV)儿童长期通气护理中的作用。研究设计:质性研究采用半结构化访谈,访谈对象为在过去五年内在四个地理位置不同的学术医疗中心开始终身价值教育的儿童的照顾者。制定并部署了一份访谈指南,包括决策过程、与医疗团队的互动、回家的过渡以及儿童得到的照顾等领域。结果:对31个有少数民族子女的家庭进行了问卷调查。大约一半的家庭描述了种族主义或其他形式的偏见影响医疗团队提供者如何与他们和他们的孩子互动的经历。关于家庭经历和描述的偏见类型,出现了四个主题:(1)种族和民族;(2)语言;(3)社会经济地位;(4)看护人的陪伴。护理人员还强调了关于如何支持在卫生系统中历史上、经济上和社会上被边缘化的种族和族裔群体的护理人员的建议,其中包括(1)知识建设和决策资源;(2)相似种族和民族背景家庭的代表性增加;(3)增加提供者的同理心和积极的信息传递。结论:对于来自种族和少数民族群体的家庭,我们发现种族主义和其他偏见可能会加剧与LTV相关的挑战。潜在的种族主义和其他偏见凸显了需要有针对性的资源来更好地支持那些追求终身价值的家庭。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Pediatrics
Journal of Pediatrics 医学-小儿科
CiteScore
6.00
自引率
2.00%
发文量
696
审稿时长
31 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Pediatrics is an international peer-reviewed journal that advances pediatric research and serves as a practical guide for pediatricians who manage health and diagnose and treat disorders in infants, children, and adolescents. The Journal publishes original work based on standards of excellence and expert review. The Journal seeks to publish high quality original articles that are immediately applicable to practice (basic science, translational research, evidence-based medicine), brief clinical and laboratory case reports, medical progress, expert commentary, grand rounds, insightful editorials, “classic” physical examinations, and novel insights into clinical and academic pediatric medicine related to every aspect of child health. Published monthly since 1932, The Journal of Pediatrics continues to promote the latest developments in pediatric medicine, child health, policy, and advocacy. Topics covered in The Journal of Pediatrics include, but are not limited to: General Pediatrics Pediatric Subspecialties Adolescent Medicine Allergy and Immunology Cardiology Critical Care Medicine Developmental-Behavioral Medicine Endocrinology Gastroenterology Hematology-Oncology Infectious Diseases Neonatal-Perinatal Medicine Nephrology Neurology Emergency Medicine Pulmonology Rheumatology Genetics Ethics Health Service Research Pediatric Hospitalist Medicine.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信