Comparative Reproducibility of Myocardial Work and Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction in Patients After an Acute Coronary Syndrome.

IF 1.4 4区 医学 Q3 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
Ruxandra Copciag, Vladimir Bratu, Roxana Rimbas, Elena Stamate, Tudor Lixandru, Alexandru Corlan, Dragos Vinereanu
{"title":"Comparative Reproducibility of Myocardial Work and Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction in Patients After an Acute Coronary Syndrome.","authors":"Ruxandra Copciag, Vladimir Bratu, Roxana Rimbas, Elena Stamate, Tudor Lixandru, Alexandru Corlan, Dragos Vinereanu","doi":"10.1111/echo.70215","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To assess reproducibility (interobserver variability and agreement) of global work efficiency (GWE) and left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), assessed by 2D-echocardiography (2-DE) and 3D-echocardiography (3-DE), in patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS), through measurements performed by operators with different levels of experience.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Echocardiographers with three levels of experience were involved in offline processing: advanced, who performed image acquisition-Reader 1 (5 years of training in 2-DE, 3 years in 3-DE); intermediate-Reader 2 (3 years of training in 2-DE, 1 year in 3-DE); and beginner-Reader 3 (1 year of training in 2-DE, 3 months in 3-DE). Measurements of GWE and LVEF were performed independently. Intraobserver and interobserver variability and agreement between readers were compared using Bland-Altman plots, as bias and limits of agreement (LOA), and Pearson correlations.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>90 patients (54 ± 9 years, 75 males) with ACS were analyzed. Comparing measurements of GWE, the following bias and LOA were obtained: R1 versus R2: bias -0.6, LOA -3-2 (r = 0.98, p < 0.001); R2 versus R3: bias -0.3, LOA -3-5 (r = 0.96, p < 0.001); R1 versus R3: bias -1, LOA -5-4 (r = 0.94, p < 0.001). Interobserver variability and agreement of GWE were comparable with LVEF by 3-DE: R1 versus R2: bias 0.6, -2, and -1.4; LOA -3-4, -7-4, and -6-4, respectively (r = 0.96, 0.91, and 0.94, respectively, all p < 0.001); however, for LVEF by 2-DE, interobserver variability was higher, while agreement was lower.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Reproducibility of GWE in patients after an ACS is independent of the experience of the operator and similar to the reproducibility of LVEF by 3-DE.</p>","PeriodicalId":50558,"journal":{"name":"Echocardiography-A Journal of Cardiovascular Ultrasound and Allied Techniques","volume":"42 8","pages":"e70215"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12335277/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Echocardiography-A Journal of Cardiovascular Ultrasound and Allied Techniques","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/echo.70215","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: To assess reproducibility (interobserver variability and agreement) of global work efficiency (GWE) and left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), assessed by 2D-echocardiography (2-DE) and 3D-echocardiography (3-DE), in patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS), through measurements performed by operators with different levels of experience.

Methods: Echocardiographers with three levels of experience were involved in offline processing: advanced, who performed image acquisition-Reader 1 (5 years of training in 2-DE, 3 years in 3-DE); intermediate-Reader 2 (3 years of training in 2-DE, 1 year in 3-DE); and beginner-Reader 3 (1 year of training in 2-DE, 3 months in 3-DE). Measurements of GWE and LVEF were performed independently. Intraobserver and interobserver variability and agreement between readers were compared using Bland-Altman plots, as bias and limits of agreement (LOA), and Pearson correlations.

Results: 90 patients (54 ± 9 years, 75 males) with ACS were analyzed. Comparing measurements of GWE, the following bias and LOA were obtained: R1 versus R2: bias -0.6, LOA -3-2 (r = 0.98, p < 0.001); R2 versus R3: bias -0.3, LOA -3-5 (r = 0.96, p < 0.001); R1 versus R3: bias -1, LOA -5-4 (r = 0.94, p < 0.001). Interobserver variability and agreement of GWE were comparable with LVEF by 3-DE: R1 versus R2: bias 0.6, -2, and -1.4; LOA -3-4, -7-4, and -6-4, respectively (r = 0.96, 0.91, and 0.94, respectively, all p < 0.001); however, for LVEF by 2-DE, interobserver variability was higher, while agreement was lower.

Conclusion: Reproducibility of GWE in patients after an ACS is independent of the experience of the operator and similar to the reproducibility of LVEF by 3-DE.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

急性冠脉综合征患者心肌功和左心室射血分数的比较再现性。
目的:通过不同经验水平的操作人员进行测量,评估2d超声心动图(2-DE)和3d超声心动图(3-DE)评估急性冠脉综合征(ACS)患者整体工作效率(GWE)和左心室射血分数(LVEF)的可重复性(观察者间变异性和一致性)。方法:采用三级经验超声心动图师进行离线处理:高级超声心动图师进行图像采集-阅读器1 (2-DE培训5年,3- de培训3年);中级阅读2 (2- de 3年,3- de 1年);初级阅读3 (2-DE培训1年,3- de培训3个月)。GWE和LVEF的测量分别进行。使用Bland-Altman图比较观察者内部和观察者之间的可变性和读者之间的一致性,作为偏差和一致性限制(LOA),以及Pearson相关性。结果:共分析90例ACS患者(54±9岁,男性75例)。比较GWE的测量值,得到以下偏倚和LOA: R1对R2:偏倚-0.6,LOA -3-2 (r = 0.98, p < 0.001);R2与R3:偏倚-0.3,LOA -3-5 (r = 0.96, p < 0.001);R1与R3:偏倚-1,LOA -5-4 (r = 0.94, p < 0.001)。GWE的观察者间变异性和一致性与LVEF具有3-DE可比性:R1与R2:偏差0.6,-2和-1.4;LOA分别为-3-4、-7-4和-6-4 (r分别为0.96、0.91和0.94,p均< 0.001);然而,对于2-DE的LVEF,观察者之间的变异性较高,而一致性较低。结论:ACS患者术后GWE的可重复性与操作者的经验无关,与3-DE法测定LVEF的可重复性相似。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.40
自引率
6.70%
发文量
211
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: Echocardiography: A Journal of Cardiovascular Ultrasound and Allied Techniques is the official publication of the International Society of Cardiovascular Ultrasound. Widely recognized for its comprehensive peer-reviewed articles, case studies, original research, and reviews by international authors. Echocardiography keeps its readership of echocardiographers, ultrasound specialists, and cardiologists well informed of the latest developments in the field.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信