High prevalence of cefiderocol resistance in carbapenem-resistant Escherichia coli: A warning from multicenter clinical data in China

IF 11.9 1区 医学 Q1 INFECTIOUS DISEASES
Ye Lu , Peng Lan , Wenzeng Xu , Lina Chen , Junxin Zhou , Qianyi Chen , Ying Cui , Yan Jiang , Yunsong Yu , Jiancang Zhou
{"title":"High prevalence of cefiderocol resistance in carbapenem-resistant Escherichia coli: A warning from multicenter clinical data in China","authors":"Ye Lu ,&nbsp;Peng Lan ,&nbsp;Wenzeng Xu ,&nbsp;Lina Chen ,&nbsp;Junxin Zhou ,&nbsp;Qianyi Chen ,&nbsp;Ying Cui ,&nbsp;Yan Jiang ,&nbsp;Yunsong Yu ,&nbsp;Jiancang Zhou","doi":"10.1016/j.jinf.2025.106563","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Aims</h3><div>This study aimed to evaluate the <em>in vitro</em> efficacy of cefiderocol and other agents against carbapenem-resistant <em>Escherichia coli</em> (CREC) clinical isolates in China and to elucidate the genetic mechanisms underlying cefiderocol resistance.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>A total of 638 non-duplicated CREC isolates were collected from 27 tertiary hospitals across China. Minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) of antimicrobial agents were determined by using agar dilution and broth microdilution methods. Whole-genome sequencing and bioinformatics analyses were conducted to identify resistance genes and mutations. Gene knockout, complementation, and CRISPR-Cas9 editing were used to validate resistance mechanisms.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div><em>In vitro</em> activity testing was conducted on 16 antimicrobial agents against all CREC isolates. Among these agents, tigecycline exhibited the highest antibacterial activity (100%), followed by polymyxin B (95.9%). However, only 82.5% of the strains were susceptible to cefiderocol, and its MIC<sub>90</sub> reached as high as &gt;128 mg/L. Among 99 cefiderocol-resistant <em>Escherichia coli</em> isolates, ST167 was the most prevalent. Over 90% of cefiderocol-resistant isolates harbored mutations or disruptions in <em>cirA</em>, in which functional validation confirmed that <em>cirA</em> inactivation, combined with NDM expression, significantly increased cefiderocol MICs. Additional resistance mechanisms included <em>bla</em><sub>CMY-2</sub> overexpression and <em>ftsI</em> mutations.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Cefiderocol shows promising activity against most CREC isolates in China; however, a notable proportion of resistance is emerging, particularly among NDM-producing clones with CirA loss.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":50180,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Infection","volume":"91 3","pages":"Article 106563"},"PeriodicalIF":11.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Infection","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0163445325001574","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"INFECTIOUS DISEASES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aims

This study aimed to evaluate the in vitro efficacy of cefiderocol and other agents against carbapenem-resistant Escherichia coli (CREC) clinical isolates in China and to elucidate the genetic mechanisms underlying cefiderocol resistance.

Methods

A total of 638 non-duplicated CREC isolates were collected from 27 tertiary hospitals across China. Minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) of antimicrobial agents were determined by using agar dilution and broth microdilution methods. Whole-genome sequencing and bioinformatics analyses were conducted to identify resistance genes and mutations. Gene knockout, complementation, and CRISPR-Cas9 editing were used to validate resistance mechanisms.

Results

In vitro activity testing was conducted on 16 antimicrobial agents against all CREC isolates. Among these agents, tigecycline exhibited the highest antibacterial activity (100%), followed by polymyxin B (95.9%). However, only 82.5% of the strains were susceptible to cefiderocol, and its MIC90 reached as high as >128 mg/L. Among 99 cefiderocol-resistant Escherichia coli isolates, ST167 was the most prevalent. Over 90% of cefiderocol-resistant isolates harbored mutations or disruptions in cirA, in which functional validation confirmed that cirA inactivation, combined with NDM expression, significantly increased cefiderocol MICs. Additional resistance mechanisms included blaCMY-2 overexpression and ftsI mutations.

Conclusions

Cefiderocol shows promising activity against most CREC isolates in China; however, a notable proportion of resistance is emerging, particularly among NDM-producing clones with CirA loss.
耐碳青霉烯大肠埃希菌对头孢地罗的高流行率:来自中国多中心临床数据的警告
目的:评价头孢地罗等药物对耐碳青霉烯型大肠杆菌(CREC)临床分离株的体外疗效,探讨头孢地罗耐药的遗传机制。方法:从全国27家三级医院收集638株非重复的CREC分离株。采用琼脂稀释法和肉汤微量稀释法测定抗菌药物的最低抑菌浓度(mic)。采用全基因组测序和生物信息学分析鉴定耐药基因和突变。基因敲除、互补和CRISPR-Cas9编辑用于验证耐药机制。结果:对16种抗菌药物进行了体外抑菌活性试验。其中替加环素的抗菌活性最高(100%),其次是多粘菌素B(95.9%)。然而,只有82人。5%的菌株对头孢地罗敏感,其MIC90最高可达128mg/L。99株头孢醚耐药大肠埃希菌中以ST167最为常见。超过90%的头孢地罗耐药分离株在cirA中存在突变或破坏,其中功能验证证实cirA失活,结合NDM表达,显著增加头孢地罗mic。其他耐药机制包括blaCMY-2过表达和ftsI突变。结论:Cefiderocol对中国大多数CREC分离株具有良好的活性;然而,显著比例的耐药正在出现,特别是在产生ndm的CirA缺失的无性系中。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Infection
Journal of Infection 医学-传染病学
CiteScore
45.90
自引率
3.20%
发文量
475
审稿时长
16 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Infection publishes original papers on all aspects of infection - clinical, microbiological and epidemiological. The Journal seeks to bring together knowledge from all specialties involved in infection research and clinical practice, and present the best work in the ever-changing field of infection. Each issue brings you Editorials that describe current or controversial topics of interest, high quality Reviews to keep you in touch with the latest developments in specific fields of interest, an Epidemiology section reporting studies in the hospital and the general community, and a lively correspondence section.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信