Trends in use of the new MeSH term "overdiagnosis": A bibliometric review.

IF 1.4 4区 医学 Q2 INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE
Emma Grundtvig Gram, Barnett S Kramer, Karsten Juhl Jørgensen, Steven Woloshin
{"title":"Trends in use of the new MeSH term \"overdiagnosis\": A bibliometric review.","authors":"Emma Grundtvig Gram, Barnett S Kramer, Karsten Juhl Jørgensen, Steven Woloshin","doi":"10.1111/hir.70000","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Although the concept of overdiagnosis was first referenced in MEDLINE 100 years ago, consensus on a clear definition has been lacking. In 2021, the MeSH term \"Overdiagnosis\" was officially introduced, which defined the concept. A key goal of the new term is to improve the reliability of literature searches and enhance the conceptual understanding of overdiagnosis.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a systematic bibliometric review of all citations indexed under the MeSH term for \"Overdiagnosis\" in MEDLINE. We compared the citations with citations identified through a text-word search for overdiagnosis not indexed under the MeSH term. Searches were performed on 15 September 2024.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We found that a higher percentage of citations indexed under the new MeSH term used it according to the definition compared with the text-word search (73.2% vs. 49.5%). The remainder used the term to describe misdiagnosis, false positives, and overtreatment. The citations indexed under the MeSH term were primarily descriptive in nature (68.7%), focusing on oncology (54.2%) and screening practices (31.2%).</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Despite advancements, the field of overdiagnosis is still in its early stages, with potential for expansion into studies addressing prevention and mitigation strategies. The introduction of the MeSH term has facilitated some degree of conceptual alignment.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our review provides insights into the current state of the overdiagnosis literature, emphasising prevalent themes and areas for further research, and improvements in MeSH indexing accuracy. Residual conceptual ambiguity surrounding overdiagnosis terminology and indexing practices may explain discrepancies in MeSH categorisation and definition adherence.</p>","PeriodicalId":47580,"journal":{"name":"Health Information and Libraries Journal","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health Information and Libraries Journal","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/hir.70000","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: Although the concept of overdiagnosis was first referenced in MEDLINE 100 years ago, consensus on a clear definition has been lacking. In 2021, the MeSH term "Overdiagnosis" was officially introduced, which defined the concept. A key goal of the new term is to improve the reliability of literature searches and enhance the conceptual understanding of overdiagnosis.

Methods: We conducted a systematic bibliometric review of all citations indexed under the MeSH term for "Overdiagnosis" in MEDLINE. We compared the citations with citations identified through a text-word search for overdiagnosis not indexed under the MeSH term. Searches were performed on 15 September 2024.

Results: We found that a higher percentage of citations indexed under the new MeSH term used it according to the definition compared with the text-word search (73.2% vs. 49.5%). The remainder used the term to describe misdiagnosis, false positives, and overtreatment. The citations indexed under the MeSH term were primarily descriptive in nature (68.7%), focusing on oncology (54.2%) and screening practices (31.2%).

Discussion: Despite advancements, the field of overdiagnosis is still in its early stages, with potential for expansion into studies addressing prevention and mitigation strategies. The introduction of the MeSH term has facilitated some degree of conceptual alignment.

Conclusion: Our review provides insights into the current state of the overdiagnosis literature, emphasising prevalent themes and areas for further research, and improvements in MeSH indexing accuracy. Residual conceptual ambiguity surrounding overdiagnosis terminology and indexing practices may explain discrepancies in MeSH categorisation and definition adherence.

使用MeSH新术语“过度诊断”的趋势:文献计量学回顾。
目的:尽管过度诊断的概念在100年前首次在MEDLINE中被提及,但一直缺乏明确定义的共识。2021年,MeSH术语“过度诊断”正式引入,定义了这一概念。新术语的一个关键目标是提高文献检索的可靠性,增强对过度诊断的概念理解。方法:我们对MEDLINE中以MeSH术语“过度诊断”为索引的所有引文进行了系统的文献计量学综述。我们将这些引文与通过文本词搜索确定的未在MeSH术语下索引的过度诊断的引文进行了比较。搜索于2024年9月15日进行。结果:我们发现,在新的MeSH术语下索引的引文中,根据定义使用该术语的比例高于文本-单词搜索(73.2%比49.5%)。其余的人用这个词来描述误诊、误报和过度治疗。在MeSH术语下索引的引文主要是描述性的(68.7%),重点是肿瘤学(54.2%)和筛查实践(31.2%)。讨论:尽管取得了进展,但过度诊断领域仍处于早期阶段,有可能扩展到针对预防和缓解策略的研究中。引入MeSH术语在一定程度上促进了概念上的一致性。结论:我们的综述提供了对过度诊断文献现状的见解,强调了流行的主题和进一步研究的领域,并提高了MeSH索引的准确性。围绕过度诊断术语和索引实践的残余概念歧义可能解释MeSH分类和定义依从性的差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Health Information and Libraries Journal
Health Information and Libraries Journal INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE-
CiteScore
6.70
自引率
10.50%
发文量
52
期刊介绍: Health Information and Libraries Journal (HILJ) provides practitioners, researchers, and students in library and health professions an international and interdisciplinary forum. Its objectives are to encourage discussion and to disseminate developments at the frontiers of information management and libraries. A major focus is communicating practices that are evidence based both in managing information and in supporting health care. The Journal encompasses: - Identifying health information needs and uses - Managing programmes and services in the changing health environment - Information technology and applications in health - Educating and training health information professionals - Outreach to health user groups
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信