Enteric methane emissions and thermal comfort indexes of Nellore steers in a livestock-forestry system in the Amazon biome.

IF 1.7 3区 农林科学 Q2 AGRICULTURE, DAIRY & ANIMAL SCIENCE
Alyce Monteiro, Flabiele S Silva, Adibe L Abdalla, Maguy Eugène, Luciano Barreto-Mendes, Renato A R Rodrigues, Ciro A Magalhães, Bruno C Pedreira
{"title":"Enteric methane emissions and thermal comfort indexes of Nellore steers in a livestock-forestry system in the Amazon biome.","authors":"Alyce Monteiro, Flabiele S Silva, Adibe L Abdalla, Maguy Eugène, Luciano Barreto-Mendes, Renato A R Rodrigues, Ciro A Magalhães, Bruno C Pedreira","doi":"10.1007/s11250-025-04607-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Livestock-forestry (LF) systems enhance the delivery of ecosystem services and sustainability by providing shade, increasing diversity, and improving carbon sequestration. Despite these benefits, more evidence is needed to establish LF systems as a viable alternative for reducing enteric CH<sub>4</sub> emissions and improving thermal comfort in beef cattle production. We aimed to evaluate the impact of the forestry component into a forage-based livestock system on animal performance, thermal comfort, and its consequences on enteric CH<sub>4</sub> emissions. The experimental design was a randomized complete block with two systems: livestock (L) and LF, each with four replicates. During both seasons, microclimate variables such as relative humidity, photosynthetically active radiation, black globe temperature, and black globe temperature-humidity index were greater in the L system. Plant-part and chemical compositions did not differ between the systems, except for a 10% greater leaf proportion in LF during the rainy season. During the dry season, the LF system showed a 47% greater total gain per ha and 33% greater stocking rate. There was no system effect on CH<sub>4</sub> production (g/day). However, in the dry season, LF presented greater CH<sub>4</sub> emissions per area. These results indicate that integrating trees into forage-based livestock systems can improve thermal comfort and animal productivity without increasing individual CH<sub>4</sub> emission, enhancing long-term productivity and sustainability.</p>","PeriodicalId":23329,"journal":{"name":"Tropical animal health and production","volume":"57 7","pages":"357"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Tropical animal health and production","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11250-025-04607-0","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"AGRICULTURE, DAIRY & ANIMAL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Livestock-forestry (LF) systems enhance the delivery of ecosystem services and sustainability by providing shade, increasing diversity, and improving carbon sequestration. Despite these benefits, more evidence is needed to establish LF systems as a viable alternative for reducing enteric CH4 emissions and improving thermal comfort in beef cattle production. We aimed to evaluate the impact of the forestry component into a forage-based livestock system on animal performance, thermal comfort, and its consequences on enteric CH4 emissions. The experimental design was a randomized complete block with two systems: livestock (L) and LF, each with four replicates. During both seasons, microclimate variables such as relative humidity, photosynthetically active radiation, black globe temperature, and black globe temperature-humidity index were greater in the L system. Plant-part and chemical compositions did not differ between the systems, except for a 10% greater leaf proportion in LF during the rainy season. During the dry season, the LF system showed a 47% greater total gain per ha and 33% greater stocking rate. There was no system effect on CH4 production (g/day). However, in the dry season, LF presented greater CH4 emissions per area. These results indicate that integrating trees into forage-based livestock systems can improve thermal comfort and animal productivity without increasing individual CH4 emission, enhancing long-term productivity and sustainability.

亚马逊生物群系畜-林系统内ellore阉牛肠道甲烷排放及热舒适指数
畜牧业-林业(LF)系统通过提供荫凉、增加多样性和改善碳固存,加强了生态系统服务的提供和可持续性。尽管有这些好处,但还需要更多的证据来证明LF系统是减少肉牛肠道甲烷排放和改善肉牛生产热舒适的可行替代方案。我们旨在评估以饲料为基础的牲畜系统中林业成分对动物生产性能、热舒适及其对肠道CH4排放的影响。试验设计为随机完全区组,设2个系统:畜(L)和畜(LF),每个系统4个重复。在两个季节,L体系的相对湿度、光合有效辐射、黑球温度和黑球温湿指数等小气候变量均较大。各系统间的植物成分和化学成分没有差异,但在雨季,低海拔地区的叶片比例增加了10%。在旱季,LF系统的每公顷总收益提高47%,载畜率提高33%。对CH4产量(g/d)无系统影响。而在旱季,低海拔地区的单位面积CH4排放量更大。这些结果表明,在不增加个体CH4排放的情况下,将树木纳入以饲料为基础的畜牧业系统可以改善动物的热舒适和生产力,提高长期生产力和可持续性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Tropical animal health and production
Tropical animal health and production 农林科学-兽医学
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
11.80%
发文量
361
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Tropical Animal Health and Production is an international journal publishing the results of original research in any field of animal health, welfare, and production with the aim of improving health and productivity of livestock, and better utilisation of animal resources, including wildlife in tropical, subtropical and similar agro-ecological environments.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信