A critical evaluation of available explicit deprescribing tools for their applicability to Indian elderly patients: a scoping review protocol.

IF 3.9 4区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Ajay Kumar Shukla, Ratinder Jhaj, Shubham Atal, Anindo Majumdar, Mahadev Meena, Sandeep Tiwari, Bushra Siddiqui, Jerin Jose Cherian, Atiya R Faruqui, Sowparnika Treasa Sabu
{"title":"A critical evaluation of available explicit deprescribing tools for their applicability to Indian elderly patients: a scoping review protocol.","authors":"Ajay Kumar Shukla, Ratinder Jhaj, Shubham Atal, Anindo Majumdar, Mahadev Meena, Sandeep Tiwari, Bushra Siddiqui, Jerin Jose Cherian, Atiya R Faruqui, Sowparnika Treasa Sabu","doi":"10.1186/s13643-025-02884-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Among the elderly, who are often exposed to polypharmacy, explicit deprescribing tools offer clear, validated guidelines for safely reducing medications. However, the effectiveness of these tools varies across healthcare settings and populations. In India, unique sociocultural and healthcare challenges demand a tailored approach to deprescribing for elderly patients, and the need to adapt existing tools to local contexts. The primary objective of this scoping review is mapping of the contextual relevance and applicability of the existing explicit deprescribing tools for elderly population in Indian healthcare settings.</p><p><strong>Methodology: </strong>The scoping review will be carried out in six stages: (1) Identifying the review question. (2) Identifying relevant studies through electronic databases (i.e., PubMed, Web of Science, and Embase). (3) Selection of studies to be included based on inclusion and exclusion criteria. Inclusion criteria for this scoping review are studies implementing explicit deprescribing tools involving Indian elderly patients, reporting on outcomes, validation methods, or contextual relevance of deprescribing tools, published in English or non-English language with English translation available. Exclusion criteria for this scoping review are studies focused on implicit deprescribing tools, review articles, case reports, commentaries, and editorials. Two independent reviewers will conduct the search and initial screening of studies. Discrepancies will then be solved through discussion with the third reviewer. (4) Charting, categorizing, and thematic analysis of the extracted data. (5) Collating, summarizing, and reporting the results. (6) Dissemination of findings.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>By reviewing the patient population and study setting of studies of explicit tools in India, vis a vis the healthcare setting and patient population for which the tool was designed, our scoping review highlighted the strengths and weaknesses in the existing literature. These findings could be used to direct future research and assess the need for a deprescribing tool adapted for the Indian elderly patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":22162,"journal":{"name":"Systematic Reviews","volume":"14 1","pages":"163"},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12333108/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Systematic Reviews","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13643-025-02884-2","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Among the elderly, who are often exposed to polypharmacy, explicit deprescribing tools offer clear, validated guidelines for safely reducing medications. However, the effectiveness of these tools varies across healthcare settings and populations. In India, unique sociocultural and healthcare challenges demand a tailored approach to deprescribing for elderly patients, and the need to adapt existing tools to local contexts. The primary objective of this scoping review is mapping of the contextual relevance and applicability of the existing explicit deprescribing tools for elderly population in Indian healthcare settings.

Methodology: The scoping review will be carried out in six stages: (1) Identifying the review question. (2) Identifying relevant studies through electronic databases (i.e., PubMed, Web of Science, and Embase). (3) Selection of studies to be included based on inclusion and exclusion criteria. Inclusion criteria for this scoping review are studies implementing explicit deprescribing tools involving Indian elderly patients, reporting on outcomes, validation methods, or contextual relevance of deprescribing tools, published in English or non-English language with English translation available. Exclusion criteria for this scoping review are studies focused on implicit deprescribing tools, review articles, case reports, commentaries, and editorials. Two independent reviewers will conduct the search and initial screening of studies. Discrepancies will then be solved through discussion with the third reviewer. (4) Charting, categorizing, and thematic analysis of the extracted data. (5) Collating, summarizing, and reporting the results. (6) Dissemination of findings.

Discussion: By reviewing the patient population and study setting of studies of explicit tools in India, vis a vis the healthcare setting and patient population for which the tool was designed, our scoping review highlighted the strengths and weaknesses in the existing literature. These findings could be used to direct future research and assess the need for a deprescribing tool adapted for the Indian elderly patients.

对印度老年患者适用的现有明确处方工具的关键评估:范围审查方案。
背景:在经常使用多种药物的老年人中,明确的开处方工具为安全减少用药提供了明确、有效的指南。然而,这些工具的有效性因医疗环境和人群而异。在印度,独特的社会文化和医疗保健挑战要求对老年患者的处方采取量身定制的方法,并且需要根据当地情况调整现有工具。这一范围审查的主要目的是绘制上下文相关性和现有的明确的描述工具的适用性,为老年人在印度医疗机构。方法:范围审查将分六个阶段进行:(1)确定审查问题。(2)通过电子数据库(PubMed、Web of Science、Embase)识别相关研究。(3)根据纳入和排除标准选择纳入的研究。本综述的纳入标准是采用明确的开处方工具的研究,涉及印度老年患者,报告结果、验证方法或开处方工具的上下文相关性,以英文或非英文发表,并提供英文翻译。本综述的排除标准是集中于隐式描述工具、综述文章、病例报告、评论和社论的研究。两名独立审稿人将对研究进行搜索和初步筛选。差异将通过与第三审稿人讨论来解决。(4)对提取的数据进行制图、分类和专题分析。(5)整理、总结、报告研究结果。(6)传播调查结果。讨论:通过回顾印度显性工具研究的患者群体和研究环境,对比设计该工具的医疗环境和患者群体,我们的范围审查突出了现有文献中的优点和缺点。这些发现可以用于指导未来的研究,并评估适合印度老年患者的处方工具的需求。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Systematic Reviews
Systematic Reviews Medicine-Medicine (miscellaneous)
CiteScore
8.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
241
审稿时长
11 weeks
期刊介绍: Systematic Reviews encompasses all aspects of the design, conduct and reporting of systematic reviews. The journal publishes high quality systematic review products including systematic review protocols, systematic reviews related to a very broad definition of health, rapid reviews, updates of already completed systematic reviews, and methods research related to the science of systematic reviews, such as decision modelling. At this time Systematic Reviews does not accept reviews of in vitro studies. The journal also aims to ensure that the results of all well-conducted systematic reviews are published, regardless of their outcome.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信