{"title":"Minimal training duration inducing near transfer in two-phase working memory training paradigm.","authors":"Nan Ni, Hiroyuki Tsubomi, Satoru Saito","doi":"10.1177/17470218251369061","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Working memory (WM) training typically induces large improvements on trained tasks, while evidence for whether these improvements transfer to other tasks remains mixed. Using a novel two-phase WM training paradigm, the present study investigated the role of training duration and the underlying mechanisms of training from the perspective of cognitive skill learning. In two experiments, we examined whether the cross-phase near transfer effects observed by Ni et al. (2023) could still be observed with minimal training durations. Both experiments involved two sets of adaptive training on serial order backward recall tasks with verbal or spatial stimulus domains. In Experiment 1, participants completed a single session of 100 trials in both training phases, but no evidence of transfer was observed. In Experiment 2, we extended the first training phase to three sessions with a total of 240 trials, and observed that backward digit span training positively transferred to subsequent backward letter span training. In contrast, backward circle span training did not enhance subsequent backward letter span training and instead showed a trend toward negative transfer. These findings suggest that transfer effects are unstable with these minimal training durations. Therefore, we recommend at least three to five training sessions per phase, as implemented by Ni et al. (2023), to ensure reliable acquisition and transfer of cognitive skills. Overall, this study highlights the potential of the two-phase training paradigm and provides practical guidance for developing more effective training protocols in future research.</p>","PeriodicalId":20869,"journal":{"name":"Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology","volume":" ","pages":"17470218251369061"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/17470218251369061","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PHYSIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Working memory (WM) training typically induces large improvements on trained tasks, while evidence for whether these improvements transfer to other tasks remains mixed. Using a novel two-phase WM training paradigm, the present study investigated the role of training duration and the underlying mechanisms of training from the perspective of cognitive skill learning. In two experiments, we examined whether the cross-phase near transfer effects observed by Ni et al. (2023) could still be observed with minimal training durations. Both experiments involved two sets of adaptive training on serial order backward recall tasks with verbal or spatial stimulus domains. In Experiment 1, participants completed a single session of 100 trials in both training phases, but no evidence of transfer was observed. In Experiment 2, we extended the first training phase to three sessions with a total of 240 trials, and observed that backward digit span training positively transferred to subsequent backward letter span training. In contrast, backward circle span training did not enhance subsequent backward letter span training and instead showed a trend toward negative transfer. These findings suggest that transfer effects are unstable with these minimal training durations. Therefore, we recommend at least three to five training sessions per phase, as implemented by Ni et al. (2023), to ensure reliable acquisition and transfer of cognitive skills. Overall, this study highlights the potential of the two-phase training paradigm and provides practical guidance for developing more effective training protocols in future research.
期刊介绍:
Promoting the interests of scientific psychology and its researchers, QJEP, the journal of the Experimental Psychology Society, is a leading journal with a long-standing tradition of publishing cutting-edge research. Several articles have become classic papers in the fields of attention, perception, learning, memory, language, and reasoning. The journal publishes original articles on any topic within the field of experimental psychology (including comparative research). These include substantial experimental reports, review papers, rapid communications (reporting novel techniques or ground breaking results), comments (on articles previously published in QJEP or on issues of general interest to experimental psychologists), and book reviews. Experimental results are welcomed from all relevant techniques, including behavioural testing, brain imaging and computational modelling.
QJEP offers a competitive publication time-scale. Accepted Rapid Communications have priority in the publication cycle and usually appear in print within three months. We aim to publish all accepted (but uncorrected) articles online within seven days. Our Latest Articles page offers immediate publication of articles upon reaching their final form.
The journal offers an open access option called Open Select, enabling authors to meet funder requirements to make their article free to read online for all in perpetuity. Authors also benefit from a broad and diverse subscription base that delivers the journal contents to a world-wide readership. Together these features ensure that the journal offers authors the opportunity to raise the visibility of their work to a global audience.