The Spacing Index (TSI): A diagnostic classification for spaced dentitions.

IF 1.5 Q3 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE
Journal of Orthodontics Pub Date : 2025-09-01 Epub Date: 2025-08-09 DOI:10.1177/14653125251358833
Minnie Lyons-Coleman, Claire Bates, Nicky Mandall, Paul Bassett
{"title":"The Spacing Index (TSI): A diagnostic classification for spaced dentitions.","authors":"Minnie Lyons-Coleman, Claire Bates, Nicky Mandall, Paul Bassett","doi":"10.1177/14653125251358833","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To test the validity and reliability of The Spacing Index (TSI).</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>A single-centre diagnostic study.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Orthodontic Department, Tameside and Glossop Integrated Care NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UKMethods:TSI was outlined based on the principle of mild spacing (0-4 mm), moderate spacing (5-8 mm) and severe spacing (>8 mm). A total of 53 anonymised study models were selected as a convenience sample of patients attending hypodontia multidisciplinary clinics. A range of cases with different amounts of spacing in each arch was chosen. Each model was measured by ML-C in millimetres using calibrated Vernier callipers and then subdivided to give the gold standard spacing TSI categorisation of mild, moderate or severe. Two test raters (CB and NM) then visually assessed the same study models and rated the spacing as mild, moderate or severe. Comparison of the gold standard rating and the test rating was made to assess the validity of TSI. The reliability of the index was assessed by both the gold standard and test raters 2 weeks later.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The weighted kappa score was 0.79 (substantial agreement) between the gold standard rater and the test raters for the mild, moderate and severe TSI categories. The weighted kappa scores were greater than 0.80, demonstrating almost perfect intra-observer reliability over time.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The proposed TSI has been shown to be valid and reliable and could be used to categorise spacing during routine orthodontic assessment.</p>","PeriodicalId":16677,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Orthodontics","volume":" ","pages":"270-274"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Orthodontics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/14653125251358833","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/8/9 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To test the validity and reliability of The Spacing Index (TSI).

Design: A single-centre diagnostic study.

Setting: Orthodontic Department, Tameside and Glossop Integrated Care NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UKMethods:TSI was outlined based on the principle of mild spacing (0-4 mm), moderate spacing (5-8 mm) and severe spacing (>8 mm). A total of 53 anonymised study models were selected as a convenience sample of patients attending hypodontia multidisciplinary clinics. A range of cases with different amounts of spacing in each arch was chosen. Each model was measured by ML-C in millimetres using calibrated Vernier callipers and then subdivided to give the gold standard spacing TSI categorisation of mild, moderate or severe. Two test raters (CB and NM) then visually assessed the same study models and rated the spacing as mild, moderate or severe. Comparison of the gold standard rating and the test rating was made to assess the validity of TSI. The reliability of the index was assessed by both the gold standard and test raters 2 weeks later.

Results: The weighted kappa score was 0.79 (substantial agreement) between the gold standard rater and the test raters for the mild, moderate and severe TSI categories. The weighted kappa scores were greater than 0.80, demonstrating almost perfect intra-observer reliability over time.

Conclusion: The proposed TSI has been shown to be valid and reliable and could be used to categorise spacing during routine orthodontic assessment.

间距指数(TSI):间距牙列的诊断分类。
目的:检验间隔指数(TSI)的效度和信度。设计:单中心诊断研究。环境:正畸科,Tameside和Glossop综合护理NHS基金会信托,曼彻斯特,英国方法:TSI根据轻度间距(0- 4mm),中度间距(5- 8mm)和重度间距(> - 8mm)的原则进行概述。总共选择53个匿名研究模型作为就诊于下颌缺损多学科诊所的患者的方便样本。选择了一系列在每个拱门中具有不同间距的案例。每个模型都是用ML-C测量的,以毫米为单位,使用校准的游标卡尺,然后再细分,给出轻度、中度或重度的黄金标准间距TSI分类。然后,两名测试评分者(CB和NM)对相同的研究模型进行视觉评估,并将间距评为轻度、中度或重度。通过金标准评定与试验评定的比较,评价TSI的有效性。2周后,由金标准和测试评分者对该指数的可靠性进行评估。结果:金标准评分者与测试评分者对轻度、中度和重度TSI类别的加权kappa评分为0.79(基本一致)。加权kappa分数大于0.80,随着时间的推移,显示出几乎完美的观察者内部可靠性。结论:所提出的TSI是有效可靠的,可用于常规正畸评估中间距的分类。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Orthodontics
Journal of Orthodontics DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE-
CiteScore
2.60
自引率
15.40%
发文量
55
期刊介绍: The Journal of Orthodontics has an international circulation, publishing papers from throughout the world. The official journal of the British Orthodontic Society, it aims to publish high quality, evidence-based, clinically orientated or clinically relevant original research papers that will underpin evidence based orthodontic care. It particularly welcomes reports on prospective research into different treatment methods and techniques but also systematic reviews, meta-analyses and studies which will stimulate interest in new developments. Regular features include original papers on clinically relevant topics, clinical case reports, reviews of the orthodontic literature, editorials, book reviews, correspondence and other features of interest to the orthodontic community. The Journal is published in full colour throughout.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信