Should We Utilize Regional Anesthesia for Traumatic Rib Fracture Patients? A TQIP-Based Study.

IF 1.7 3区 医学 Q2 SURGERY
Journal of Surgical Research Pub Date : 2025-10-01 Epub Date: 2025-08-07 DOI:10.1016/j.jss.2025.06.091
Marina Levochkina, Carter Colwell, Taneen Maghsoudi, Katie Bower, Tonja Locklear, Maxine Lee, Michael Saccocci, Hunter Sharp, Joshua Stodghill
{"title":"Should We Utilize Regional Anesthesia for Traumatic Rib Fracture Patients? A TQIP-Based Study.","authors":"Marina Levochkina, Carter Colwell, Taneen Maghsoudi, Katie Bower, Tonja Locklear, Maxine Lee, Michael Saccocci, Hunter Sharp, Joshua Stodghill","doi":"10.1016/j.jss.2025.06.091","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Rib fractures are a common injury in trauma patients and can lead to pneumonia, respiratory failure, and mortality. Multimodal analgesia, alone or with regional anesthetic (epidural or local block), is a mainstay in management. Single-institution studies have evaluated the effectiveness of regional anesthesia with varied results. This study utilized national trauma registry (Trauma Quality Improvement Program [TQIP]) data to evaluate the association between regional anesthesia and mortality, as well as secondary outcomes of hospital complications and ventilator/intensive care unit (ICU)/hospital length of stay (HLOS).</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Utilizing TQIP data from 2021, all patients with isolated chest trauma were identified. Data collected included demographic, medical comorbidities, injury severity, type of injury, hospital complications, ventilator/ICU/HLOS, and in-hospital mortality. Patients were categorized as those receiving regional anesthesia (epidural or peripheral nerve block) or no regional anesthesia. Propensity matching was performed, and outcomes were compared.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>After propensity matching, 1295 patients were included in each group. There was no significant difference in in-hospital mortality between the two groups. Increased HLOS, ICU admissions, unplanned intubations, and unplanned upgrade to the ICU were associated with regional anesthesia. There were no other significant differences in outcomes between the two groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>A review of TQIP data did not detect a difference in mortality with regional anesthesia for rib fracture management. Rather, regional anesthesia was associated with increased HLOS, ICU admissions, unplanned intubations, and unplanned upgrade to the ICU. Further study is warranted to assess if subsets of patients might benefit from these procedures.</p>","PeriodicalId":17030,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Surgical Research","volume":"314 ","pages":"273-283"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Surgical Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jss.2025.06.091","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/8/7 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Rib fractures are a common injury in trauma patients and can lead to pneumonia, respiratory failure, and mortality. Multimodal analgesia, alone or with regional anesthetic (epidural or local block), is a mainstay in management. Single-institution studies have evaluated the effectiveness of regional anesthesia with varied results. This study utilized national trauma registry (Trauma Quality Improvement Program [TQIP]) data to evaluate the association between regional anesthesia and mortality, as well as secondary outcomes of hospital complications and ventilator/intensive care unit (ICU)/hospital length of stay (HLOS).

Materials and methods: Utilizing TQIP data from 2021, all patients with isolated chest trauma were identified. Data collected included demographic, medical comorbidities, injury severity, type of injury, hospital complications, ventilator/ICU/HLOS, and in-hospital mortality. Patients were categorized as those receiving regional anesthesia (epidural or peripheral nerve block) or no regional anesthesia. Propensity matching was performed, and outcomes were compared.

Results: After propensity matching, 1295 patients were included in each group. There was no significant difference in in-hospital mortality between the two groups. Increased HLOS, ICU admissions, unplanned intubations, and unplanned upgrade to the ICU were associated with regional anesthesia. There were no other significant differences in outcomes between the two groups.

Conclusions: A review of TQIP data did not detect a difference in mortality with regional anesthesia for rib fracture management. Rather, regional anesthesia was associated with increased HLOS, ICU admissions, unplanned intubations, and unplanned upgrade to the ICU. Further study is warranted to assess if subsets of patients might benefit from these procedures.

外伤性肋骨骨折患者是否应该使用区域麻醉?一项基于tqip的研究。
简介:肋骨骨折是创伤患者常见的损伤,可导致肺炎、呼吸衰竭和死亡。多模式镇痛,单独或与区域麻醉(硬膜外或局部阻滞),是主要的治疗方法。单一机构的研究评估了区域麻醉的有效性,结果各不相同。本研究利用国家创伤登记(创伤质量改进计划[TQIP])数据来评估区域麻醉与死亡率之间的关系,以及医院并发症和呼吸机/重症监护病房(ICU)/住院时间(HLOS)的次要结局。材料和方法:利用2021年的TQIP数据,对所有孤立性胸外伤患者进行鉴定。收集的数据包括人口统计学、医疗合并症、损伤严重程度、损伤类型、医院并发症、呼吸机/ICU/HLOS和院内死亡率。患者分为接受区域麻醉(硬膜外阻滞或周围神经阻滞)和未接受区域麻醉两组。进行倾向匹配,并比较结果。结果:经倾向匹配后,每组纳入1295例患者。两组住院死亡率无显著差异。HLOS增加、ICU入院、计划外插管和计划外升级到ICU与区域麻醉有关。两组之间的结果没有其他显著差异。结论:对TQIP数据的回顾没有发现区域麻醉治疗肋骨骨折的死亡率差异。相反,区域麻醉与HLOS增加、ICU入院、计划外插管和计划外升级到ICU有关。需要进一步的研究来评估亚群患者是否可以从这些手术中获益。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.90
自引率
4.50%
发文量
627
审稿时长
138 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Surgical Research: Clinical and Laboratory Investigation publishes original articles concerned with clinical and laboratory investigations relevant to surgical practice and teaching. The journal emphasizes reports of clinical investigations or fundamental research bearing directly on surgical management that will be of general interest to a broad range of surgeons and surgical researchers. The articles presented need not have been the products of surgeons or of surgical laboratories. The Journal of Surgical Research also features review articles and special articles relating to educational, research, or social issues of interest to the academic surgical community.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信