Andrei D Cumpanas, Aymon Ali, Eman N Chaudhri, Mariah C Hernandez, Candices M Tran, Thao N Vu, Yezan F Hadidi, Bruce M Gao, Zachary E Tano, Sohrab N Ali, Roshan M Patel, Jaime Landman, Ralph V Clayman
{"title":"Accurate Assessment of Interval Change in Stone Burden Among Patients with Medullary Sponge Kidney: A Volumetric Approach.","authors":"Andrei D Cumpanas, Aymon Ali, Eman N Chaudhri, Mariah C Hernandez, Candices M Tran, Thao N Vu, Yezan F Hadidi, Bruce M Gao, Zachary E Tano, Sohrab N Ali, Roshan M Patel, Jaime Landman, Ralph V Clayman","doi":"10.1177/08927790251366899","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b><i>Introduction:</i></b> Medullary sponge kidney (MSK) and nephrocalcinosis (NC) are radiographically characterized by the formation of innumerable intrarenal concretions. Accurate determination of disease progression is challenging given the large and typically sporadic calcific burden, limiting the utility of traditional manual linear measurements on non-contrast computerized tomography (NCCT). Progression of stone size or quantity is an important predictor of morbidity in recurrent stone formers. As such, among these patients, we sought to test the accuracy of serial NCCT reports indicating a \"stable/unchanged\" stone burden against actual stone volume measurements using 3-dimensional Slicer®. <b><i>Materials and Methods:</i></b> 20 MSK/NC patients with a \"stable/unchanged\" stone burden report between January 2018 and September 2023 were retrospectively enrolled in this study. A second group of 50 patients with a single stone was also evaluated during the same time period. Volumetric stone burden measurements were completed by a physician reviewer with over 200 hours of experience with 3D Slicer®. The reviewer was blinded to the dates of the NCCT. Based on volume measurements, we determined the failure to detect a 15%, 25%, or 50% increase in stone volume. A two-tailed chi-square test was used to compare the two patient groups. <b><i>Results:</i></b> The mean time between paired NCCTs was 15.23 months ±8.58. In 49% of MSK patients, the \"stable/unchanged\" stone burden report was incorrect. Indeed, among these patients, there was a median stone growth of 297 mm<sup>3</sup> (IQR: 128.88-745.55 mm<sup>3</sup>). An increase in stone burden of 15%, 25%, or 50% was missed in 49%, 39%, and 20% of cases, respectively. In contrast, for the single-stone patients the rate of \"stable/unchanged\" stone burden misclassification was significantly lower, with an increase in stone burden of 15%, 25%, or 50% being missed in 24%, 9%, and 7% of cases, respectively. <b><i>Conclusion:</i></b> NCCT volumetric progression of nephrolithiasis at a mean time of 15 months among MSK patients was misread as \"stable/unchanged\" stone disease in almost half of our patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":15723,"journal":{"name":"Journal of endourology","volume":" ","pages":"766-771"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of endourology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/08927790251366899","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/8/8 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Introduction: Medullary sponge kidney (MSK) and nephrocalcinosis (NC) are radiographically characterized by the formation of innumerable intrarenal concretions. Accurate determination of disease progression is challenging given the large and typically sporadic calcific burden, limiting the utility of traditional manual linear measurements on non-contrast computerized tomography (NCCT). Progression of stone size or quantity is an important predictor of morbidity in recurrent stone formers. As such, among these patients, we sought to test the accuracy of serial NCCT reports indicating a "stable/unchanged" stone burden against actual stone volume measurements using 3-dimensional Slicer®. Materials and Methods: 20 MSK/NC patients with a "stable/unchanged" stone burden report between January 2018 and September 2023 were retrospectively enrolled in this study. A second group of 50 patients with a single stone was also evaluated during the same time period. Volumetric stone burden measurements were completed by a physician reviewer with over 200 hours of experience with 3D Slicer®. The reviewer was blinded to the dates of the NCCT. Based on volume measurements, we determined the failure to detect a 15%, 25%, or 50% increase in stone volume. A two-tailed chi-square test was used to compare the two patient groups. Results: The mean time between paired NCCTs was 15.23 months ±8.58. In 49% of MSK patients, the "stable/unchanged" stone burden report was incorrect. Indeed, among these patients, there was a median stone growth of 297 mm3 (IQR: 128.88-745.55 mm3). An increase in stone burden of 15%, 25%, or 50% was missed in 49%, 39%, and 20% of cases, respectively. In contrast, for the single-stone patients the rate of "stable/unchanged" stone burden misclassification was significantly lower, with an increase in stone burden of 15%, 25%, or 50% being missed in 24%, 9%, and 7% of cases, respectively. Conclusion: NCCT volumetric progression of nephrolithiasis at a mean time of 15 months among MSK patients was misread as "stable/unchanged" stone disease in almost half of our patients.
期刊介绍:
Journal of Endourology, JE Case Reports, and Videourology are the leading peer-reviewed journal, case reports publication, and innovative videojournal companion covering all aspects of minimally invasive urology research, applications, and clinical outcomes.
The leading journal of minimally invasive urology for over 30 years, Journal of Endourology is the essential publication for practicing surgeons who want to keep up with the latest surgical technologies in endoscopic, laparoscopic, robotic, and image-guided procedures as they apply to benign and malignant diseases of the genitourinary tract. This flagship journal includes the companion videojournal Videourology™ with every subscription. While Journal of Endourology remains focused on publishing rigorously peer reviewed articles, Videourology accepts original videos containing material that has not been reported elsewhere, except in the form of an abstract or a conference presentation.
Journal of Endourology coverage includes:
The latest laparoscopic, robotic, endoscopic, and image-guided techniques for treating both benign and malignant conditions
Pioneering research articles
Controversial cases in endourology
Techniques in endourology with accompanying videos
Reviews and epochs in endourology
Endourology survey section of endourology relevant manuscripts published in other journals.