Hemodynamic integration of pulmonary artery pulsatility index and compliance for risk stratification in patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction.

IF 2.6 3区 医学 Q2 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
Yuta Ozaki, Yusuke Uemura, Toru Kondo, Shingo Kazama, Shogo Yamaguchi, Takashi Okajima, Takayuki Mitsuda, Shinji Ishikawa, Kenji Takemoto, Takahiro Okumura, Toyoaki Murohara, Masato Watarai
{"title":"Hemodynamic integration of pulmonary artery pulsatility index and compliance for risk stratification in patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction.","authors":"Yuta Ozaki, Yusuke Uemura, Toru Kondo, Shingo Kazama, Shogo Yamaguchi, Takashi Okajima, Takayuki Mitsuda, Shinji Ishikawa, Kenji Takemoto, Takahiro Okumura, Toyoaki Murohara, Masato Watarai","doi":"10.1016/j.jjcc.2025.07.012","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Right ventricular dysfunction (RVD) and right ventricular (RV) afterload are recognized prognostic factors in patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF). Hemodynamic phenotyping based on RVD and RV afterload may help identify clinically meaningful subgroups within the HFrEF population. This study aimed to investigate the prognostic associations of pulmonary artery pulsatility index (PAPi) and pulmonary arterial capacitance (PAC) in patients with HFrEF.</p><p><strong>Methods and results: </strong>We retrospectively analyzed a cohort of 156 patients with HFrEF who underwent right heart catheterization. Patients were categorized into four groups based on median PAPi and PAC values. The primary endpoint was a composite of cardiovascular death or heart failure-related hospitalization over a median follow-up of 2.9 years. Kaplan-Meier analysis demonstrated a significant difference in event-free survival across the groups. In multivariate Cox proportional analysis, patients with low PAPi and PAC had significantly worse outcomes than those with high values. Incorporating PAPi and PAC values into the Meta-analysis Global Group in Chronic Heart Failure risk score enhanced the prognostic value of the C-index from 0.658 to 0.703, with a ΔC-index of 0.045.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Combining PAPi and PAC provides additional prognostic value in patients with HFrEF. Incorporating these parameters into clinical assessment may enhance risk stratification and guide future phenotype-specific therapeutic strategies.</p>","PeriodicalId":15223,"journal":{"name":"Journal of cardiology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of cardiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jjcc.2025.07.012","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Right ventricular dysfunction (RVD) and right ventricular (RV) afterload are recognized prognostic factors in patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF). Hemodynamic phenotyping based on RVD and RV afterload may help identify clinically meaningful subgroups within the HFrEF population. This study aimed to investigate the prognostic associations of pulmonary artery pulsatility index (PAPi) and pulmonary arterial capacitance (PAC) in patients with HFrEF.

Methods and results: We retrospectively analyzed a cohort of 156 patients with HFrEF who underwent right heart catheterization. Patients were categorized into four groups based on median PAPi and PAC values. The primary endpoint was a composite of cardiovascular death or heart failure-related hospitalization over a median follow-up of 2.9 years. Kaplan-Meier analysis demonstrated a significant difference in event-free survival across the groups. In multivariate Cox proportional analysis, patients with low PAPi and PAC had significantly worse outcomes than those with high values. Incorporating PAPi and PAC values into the Meta-analysis Global Group in Chronic Heart Failure risk score enhanced the prognostic value of the C-index from 0.658 to 0.703, with a ΔC-index of 0.045.

Conclusion: Combining PAPi and PAC provides additional prognostic value in patients with HFrEF. Incorporating these parameters into clinical assessment may enhance risk stratification and guide future phenotype-specific therapeutic strategies.

心力衰竭伴射血分数降低患者肺动脉搏动指数的血流动力学积分和风险分层的依从性。
背景:右心室功能障碍(RVD)和右心室负荷(RV)是公认的影响心力衰竭伴射血分数降低(HFrEF)患者预后的因素。基于RVD和RV后负荷的血流动力学表型可能有助于确定HFrEF人群中有临床意义的亚群。本研究旨在探讨肺动脉搏动指数(PAPi)和肺动脉电容(PAC)与HFrEF患者预后的关系。方法和结果:我们回顾性分析了156例接受右心导管置入的HFrEF患者。根据中位PAPi和PAC值将患者分为四组。主要终点是心血管死亡或心力衰竭相关住院的复合,中位随访时间为2.9 年。Kaplan-Meier分析显示各组无事件生存率有显著差异。在多变量Cox比例分析中,低PAPi和PAC患者的预后明显差于高值患者。将PAPi和PAC值纳入慢性心力衰竭风险评分meta -分析Global Group,将C-index的预后价值从0.658提高到0.703,ΔC-index为0.045。结论:联合PAPi和PAC对HFrEF患者的预后有额外的价值。将这些参数纳入临床评估可能会加强风险分层,并指导未来的表型特异性治疗策略。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of cardiology
Journal of cardiology CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS-
CiteScore
4.90
自引率
8.00%
发文量
202
审稿时长
29 days
期刊介绍: The official journal of the Japanese College of Cardiology is an international, English language, peer-reviewed journal publishing the latest findings in cardiovascular medicine. Journal of Cardiology (JC) aims to publish the highest-quality material covering original basic and clinical research on all aspects of cardiovascular disease. Topics covered include ischemic heart disease, cardiomyopathy, valvular heart disease, vascular disease, hypertension, arrhythmia, congenital heart disease, pharmacological and non-pharmacological treatment, new diagnostic techniques, and cardiovascular imaging. JC also publishes a selection of review articles, clinical trials, short communications, and important messages and letters to the editor.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信