Association of family dysfunction childhood adversities and lifetime attempts in men and women.

IF 4.9 2区 医学 Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Journal of affective disorders Pub Date : 2025-12-15 Epub Date: 2025-08-06 DOI:10.1016/j.jad.2025.120012
Mathilde M Husky, Christophe Léon, Helen-Maria Vasiliadis
{"title":"Association of family dysfunction childhood adversities and lifetime attempts in men and women.","authors":"Mathilde M Husky, Christophe Léon, Helen-Maria Vasiliadis","doi":"10.1016/j.jad.2025.120012","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The objectives of the study were to examine the prevalence of family dysfunction childhood adversities (CAs) by sex in a nationally representative sample and to investigate the sex-specific association of CAs with lifetime suicide attempts.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Data were drawn from the 2005, 2010, and 2017 nationally representative cross-sectional French Health Barometer surveys (n = 47,105) to examine exposure to three types of CAs and their association with lifetime suicide attempts. Logistic regressions were performed to identify associations of every exposure combination with the odds of suicide attempts overall, and stratified by gender.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Overall, 43.9 % of adults reported exposure to at least one type of CA: 16.4 % parental separation, 22.4 % parental illness or death, and 22.5 % parental discord. Women reported exposure to CAs more frequently (54.1 %) than did men (45.9 %), (χ<sup>2</sup> = 132,00, df = 1, p < 0.0001). Overall, 8.7 % of women and 3.7 % of men reported a lifetime suicide attempt. In multivariable models, female sex (AOR = 2.13, 95 %CI = 1.96-2.32) and each form of exposure to CAs was associated with higher odds of reporting a lifetime attempt with exposure to all three types of CAs associated with the highest odds of lifetime attempt (AOR = 5.15, 95 %CI = 4.37-6.07). Parental discord held the strongest association with attempts, compared to illness/death or separation. In stratified analyses, CAs were equally associated with attempts among men and women.</p><p><strong>Limitations: </strong>Cross-sectional surveys.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Parental discord was found to be highly prevalent in the general population and strongly associated with suicide attempts. No sex-specific associations were observed in the association of adversity types and number with attempts.</p>","PeriodicalId":14963,"journal":{"name":"Journal of affective disorders","volume":" ","pages":"120012"},"PeriodicalIF":4.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-12-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of affective disorders","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jad.2025.120012","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/8/6 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: The objectives of the study were to examine the prevalence of family dysfunction childhood adversities (CAs) by sex in a nationally representative sample and to investigate the sex-specific association of CAs with lifetime suicide attempts.

Methods: Data were drawn from the 2005, 2010, and 2017 nationally representative cross-sectional French Health Barometer surveys (n = 47,105) to examine exposure to three types of CAs and their association with lifetime suicide attempts. Logistic regressions were performed to identify associations of every exposure combination with the odds of suicide attempts overall, and stratified by gender.

Results: Overall, 43.9 % of adults reported exposure to at least one type of CA: 16.4 % parental separation, 22.4 % parental illness or death, and 22.5 % parental discord. Women reported exposure to CAs more frequently (54.1 %) than did men (45.9 %), (χ2 = 132,00, df = 1, p < 0.0001). Overall, 8.7 % of women and 3.7 % of men reported a lifetime suicide attempt. In multivariable models, female sex (AOR = 2.13, 95 %CI = 1.96-2.32) and each form of exposure to CAs was associated with higher odds of reporting a lifetime attempt with exposure to all three types of CAs associated with the highest odds of lifetime attempt (AOR = 5.15, 95 %CI = 4.37-6.07). Parental discord held the strongest association with attempts, compared to illness/death or separation. In stratified analyses, CAs were equally associated with attempts among men and women.

Limitations: Cross-sectional surveys.

Conclusions: Parental discord was found to be highly prevalent in the general population and strongly associated with suicide attempts. No sex-specific associations were observed in the association of adversity types and number with attempts.

家庭功能障碍、童年逆境与男性和女性终生尝试的关系。
目的:本研究的目的是在全国代表性样本中按性别检查家庭功能障碍儿童逆境(CAs)的患病率,并调查CAs与终生自杀企图的性别特异性关联。方法:数据来自2005年、2010年和2017年具有全国代表性的法国健康晴雨表横断面调查(n = 47,105),以检查三种类型的ca暴露及其与终生自杀企图的关系。进行了逻辑回归,以确定每种暴露组合与总体自杀企图几率的关联,并按性别分层。结果:总体而言,43.9% %的成年人报告至少接触过一种CA: 16.4% %的父母分居,22.4% %的父母患病或死亡,22.5% %的父母不和。女性报告的ca暴露频率(54.1 %)高于男性(45.9 %),(χ2 = 13.2 000,df = 1,p 局限性:横断面调查。结论:发现父母不和在普通人群中非常普遍,并且与自杀企图密切相关。在逆境类型和次数与尝试的关联中没有观察到性别特异性的关联。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of affective disorders
Journal of affective disorders 医学-精神病学
CiteScore
10.90
自引率
6.10%
发文量
1319
审稿时长
9.3 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Affective Disorders publishes papers concerned with affective disorders in the widest sense: depression, mania, mood spectrum, emotions and personality, anxiety and stress. It is interdisciplinary and aims to bring together different approaches for a diverse readership. Top quality papers will be accepted dealing with any aspect of affective disorders, including neuroimaging, cognitive neurosciences, genetics, molecular biology, experimental and clinical neurosciences, pharmacology, neuroimmunoendocrinology, intervention and treatment trials.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信