GFAP as a marker of astrocytic damage correlated with medication overuse in migraine.

IF 3.1 4区 医学 Q3 IMMUNOLOGY
Sara Carta, Vanessa Chiodega, Riccardo Tiberi, Alessia Pasquali, Sergio Ferrari, Silvia Bozzetti, Federico Ranieri, Fabio Marchioretto, Sara Mariotto
{"title":"GFAP as a marker of astrocytic damage correlated with medication overuse in migraine.","authors":"Sara Carta, Vanessa Chiodega, Riccardo Tiberi, Alessia Pasquali, Sergio Ferrari, Silvia Bozzetti, Federico Ranieri, Fabio Marchioretto, Sara Mariotto","doi":"10.1007/s12026-025-09674-x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Different mechanisms are involved in migraine pathogenesis, including neurogenic inflammation, neurodegenerative processes, and a potential role of microglia. The aim of this study was to assess axonal and glial damage measuring serum levels of neurofilament light chain (NfL) and glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP) in migraine patients. Serum samples of 25 patients with episodic migraine (EM), 25 with chronic migraine (CM) diagnosed in accordance with the International Classification of Headache Disorders, 3rd edition (ICHD-3), and 50 age-matched healthy controls were prospectively collected. NfL and GFAP levels were assessed using ultrasensitive paramagnetic bead-based ELISA (SIMOA). Non-parametric tests were used for group comparison and 2-tailed Spearman analysis to assess correlations. GFAP levels were significantly increased in migraine patients (median 103.15 pg/mL [IQR 70.98-146.34] vs. 69.43 pg/mL [IQR 53.04-91.85], p < 0.001), particularly in those with medication overuse (106.08 [IQR 87.94-159.07] vs. 71.38 [IQR 54.16-135.06], p = 0.007), without difference between EM and CM (p = 0.985). Although NfL levels were not increased (p = 0.387), they were higher in patients with a long migraine course (rho 0.519, p < 0.001). Attack at sampling/days from last attack, migraine frequency/attack severity did not influence NfL or GFAP levels. Our findings demonstrate the occurrence of glial damage, particularly correlated with medication overuse, and the presence of axonal damage in the later disease stage, providing potential novel cues for the migraine pathogenesis.</p>","PeriodicalId":13389,"journal":{"name":"Immunologic Research","volume":"73 1","pages":"119"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12334492/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Immunologic Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s12026-025-09674-x","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"IMMUNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Different mechanisms are involved in migraine pathogenesis, including neurogenic inflammation, neurodegenerative processes, and a potential role of microglia. The aim of this study was to assess axonal and glial damage measuring serum levels of neurofilament light chain (NfL) and glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP) in migraine patients. Serum samples of 25 patients with episodic migraine (EM), 25 with chronic migraine (CM) diagnosed in accordance with the International Classification of Headache Disorders, 3rd edition (ICHD-3), and 50 age-matched healthy controls were prospectively collected. NfL and GFAP levels were assessed using ultrasensitive paramagnetic bead-based ELISA (SIMOA). Non-parametric tests were used for group comparison and 2-tailed Spearman analysis to assess correlations. GFAP levels were significantly increased in migraine patients (median 103.15 pg/mL [IQR 70.98-146.34] vs. 69.43 pg/mL [IQR 53.04-91.85], p < 0.001), particularly in those with medication overuse (106.08 [IQR 87.94-159.07] vs. 71.38 [IQR 54.16-135.06], p = 0.007), without difference between EM and CM (p = 0.985). Although NfL levels were not increased (p = 0.387), they were higher in patients with a long migraine course (rho 0.519, p < 0.001). Attack at sampling/days from last attack, migraine frequency/attack severity did not influence NfL or GFAP levels. Our findings demonstrate the occurrence of glial damage, particularly correlated with medication overuse, and the presence of axonal damage in the later disease stage, providing potential novel cues for the migraine pathogenesis.

Abstract Image

GFAP作为星形细胞损伤的标志与偏头痛药物过度使用相关。
偏头痛的发病机制不同,包括神经源性炎症、神经退行性过程和小胶质细胞的潜在作用。本研究的目的是通过测量偏头痛患者血清中神经丝轻链(NfL)和胶质纤维酸性蛋白(GFAP)的水平来评估轴突和胶质损伤。前瞻性收集25例发作性偏头痛(EM)患者、25例根据国际头痛疾病分类第三版(ICHD-3)诊断的慢性偏头痛(CM)患者和50例年龄匹配的健康对照者的血清样本。采用超灵敏顺磁珠酶联免疫吸附试验(SIMOA)评估NfL和GFAP水平。采用非参数检验进行组间比较,采用双尾Spearman分析评估相关性。偏头痛患者GFAP水平显著升高(中位数为103.15 pg/mL [IQR 70.98-146.34] vs. 69.43 pg/mL [IQR 53.04-91.85], p
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Immunologic Research
Immunologic Research 医学-免疫学
CiteScore
6.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
83
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: IMMUNOLOGIC RESEARCH represents a unique medium for the presentation, interpretation, and clarification of complex scientific data. Information is presented in the form of interpretive synthesis reviews, original research articles, symposia, editorials, and theoretical essays. The scope of coverage extends to cellular immunology, immunogenetics, molecular and structural immunology, immunoregulation and autoimmunity, immunopathology, tumor immunology, host defense and microbial immunity, including viral immunology, immunohematology, mucosal immunity, complement, transplantation immunology, clinical immunology, neuroimmunology, immunoendocrinology, immunotoxicology, translational immunology, and history of immunology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信