A comparative review of the role of a national society of surgical oncology.

Abstract

Background: National societies of surgical oncology (NSSOs) are integral to the coordination and promotion of high-quality cancer surgery. However, their functions vary internationally, and some countries lack a formal society. This study aimed to explore the leadership of NSSO and to describe the scope of their activities, with a view to guiding surgeons with an interest in establishing a NSSO.

Methods: A purposive sampling strategy was used to identify leaders of NSSOs. Semi-structured interviews were conducted and analysed using thematic analysis. The Standards for Reporting Qualitative Research (SRQR) framework guided reporting. Additionally, key recommendations were tabulated to assist countries interested in establishing an NSSO.

Results: Nine expressions of interest were received; six NSSO leaders participated in interviews, representing Belgium, Brazil, Germany, Italy, the Netherlands, and the United Kingdom. Five of these are European countries and members of the European Society of Surgical Oncology (ESSO). Thematic analysis identified seven core domains of activity: dissemination of knowledge, improvement of patient outcomes, research promotion, capacity building, financing, fostering collaboration, and member engagement.

Conclusion: NSSOs play a pivotal role in advancing equitable and high-quality cancer surgery at national and international levels. Comparative research is warranted to assess the impact of NSSOs on patient outcomes and health system performance. These findings may inform efforts in countries currently without a national surgical oncology society.