Exploring the Role of Hematological Markers and Blood Groups in Breast Cancer Diagnosis.

IF 0.6 4区 医学 Q4 MEDICAL LABORATORY TECHNOLOGY
Alaa Banjar, Husam Rezeig, Murad Alturkustani, Talal Qadah
{"title":"Exploring the Role of Hematological Markers and Blood Groups in Breast Cancer Diagnosis.","authors":"Alaa Banjar, Husam Rezeig, Murad Alturkustani, Talal Qadah","doi":"10.7754/Clin.Lab.2025.250131","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Breast cancer is considered one of the most common types of cancer among women worldwide, with 2.3 million new cases reported in 2020. In Saudi Arabia, breast cancer has the highest incidence among women, representing 31.4% of all cancer types. Utilization of hematological laboratory parameters can serve as diagnostic tools for identification and monitoring of the progress of breast cancer. For this reason, this study aimed to inves-tigate the effectiveness of hematological parameters, particularly CBC and ABO blood groups, in the diagnosis of breast cancer.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This case-control retrospective study was carried out on female patients that visited King Abdulaziz University Hospital, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia, from January 2020 through December 2023. Descriptive analysis of CBC reports and ABO blood groups between breast cancer patients and normal subjects was carried out with 95% confidence intervals being calculated. Significant differences were reported at p-values of less than 0.05.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>While the study showed several significant differences in hematological parameters between patients and normal subjects, their diagnostic value as standalone biomarkers for breast cancer is limited. However, the strongest potential diagnostic markers were observed in MCV and MCH, which showed AUC = 0.73 for each, and RDW with AUC = 0.65. Collectively, when combined in a predictive index, they showed a sensitivity of 70% and specificity of 66%, with overall accuracy of 71.3%. These tests (i.e. MCV, MCH, and RDW) are considered useful and complementary rather than for them to be used as standalone tests for diagnosis of breast cancer. Therefore, they can be useful as a preliminary indicator with the presence of clinical indications. The relationship between ABO blood groups and breast cancer showed limited diagnostic value with no significant differences.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Despite the significant differences observed in some hematological parameters, CBC and ABO blood grouping cannot be trustworthy for diagnostic purposes alone in patients with breast cancer. Combining hemato-logical laboratory markers with other clinical and diagnostic data is crucial for improving diagnostic reliability. This work emphasizes the complexity of cancer diagnosis and the need for further research to develop comprehensive predictive models.</p>","PeriodicalId":10384,"journal":{"name":"Clinical laboratory","volume":"71 8","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical laboratory","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7754/Clin.Lab.2025.250131","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"MEDICAL LABORATORY TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Breast cancer is considered one of the most common types of cancer among women worldwide, with 2.3 million new cases reported in 2020. In Saudi Arabia, breast cancer has the highest incidence among women, representing 31.4% of all cancer types. Utilization of hematological laboratory parameters can serve as diagnostic tools for identification and monitoring of the progress of breast cancer. For this reason, this study aimed to inves-tigate the effectiveness of hematological parameters, particularly CBC and ABO blood groups, in the diagnosis of breast cancer.

Methods: This case-control retrospective study was carried out on female patients that visited King Abdulaziz University Hospital, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia, from January 2020 through December 2023. Descriptive analysis of CBC reports and ABO blood groups between breast cancer patients and normal subjects was carried out with 95% confidence intervals being calculated. Significant differences were reported at p-values of less than 0.05.

Results: While the study showed several significant differences in hematological parameters between patients and normal subjects, their diagnostic value as standalone biomarkers for breast cancer is limited. However, the strongest potential diagnostic markers were observed in MCV and MCH, which showed AUC = 0.73 for each, and RDW with AUC = 0.65. Collectively, when combined in a predictive index, they showed a sensitivity of 70% and specificity of 66%, with overall accuracy of 71.3%. These tests (i.e. MCV, MCH, and RDW) are considered useful and complementary rather than for them to be used as standalone tests for diagnosis of breast cancer. Therefore, they can be useful as a preliminary indicator with the presence of clinical indications. The relationship between ABO blood groups and breast cancer showed limited diagnostic value with no significant differences.

Conclusions: Despite the significant differences observed in some hematological parameters, CBC and ABO blood grouping cannot be trustworthy for diagnostic purposes alone in patients with breast cancer. Combining hemato-logical laboratory markers with other clinical and diagnostic data is crucial for improving diagnostic reliability. This work emphasizes the complexity of cancer diagnosis and the need for further research to develop comprehensive predictive models.

探讨血液学指标和血型在乳腺癌诊断中的作用。
背景:乳腺癌被认为是全球女性中最常见的癌症类型之一,2020年报告的新病例为230万例。在沙特阿拉伯,乳腺癌在妇女中的发病率最高,占所有癌症类型的31.4%。利用血液学实验室参数可以作为诊断工具来识别和监测乳腺癌的进展。因此,本研究旨在探讨血液学参数,特别是CBC和ABO血型在乳腺癌诊断中的有效性。方法:对2020年1月至2023年12月在沙特阿拉伯吉达阿卜杜勒阿齐兹国王大学医院就诊的女性患者进行病例对照回顾性研究。对乳腺癌患者与正常受试者的CBC报告和ABO血型进行描述性分析,计算95%置信区间。p值< 0.05,差异有统计学意义。结果:虽然该研究显示患者与正常受试者之间的血液学参数存在一些显著差异,但其作为乳腺癌独立生物标志物的诊断价值有限。然而,MCV和MCH的潜在诊断标志物最强,分别显示AUC = 0.73, RDW的AUC = 0.65。总的来说,当结合一个预测指数时,它们的敏感性为70%,特异性为66%,总体准确性为71.3%。这些测试(即MCV、MCH和RDW)被认为是有用的和互补的,而不是将它们作为诊断乳腺癌的独立测试。因此,它们可以作为有临床指征的初步指标。ABO血型与乳腺癌的关系诊断价值有限,无显著差异。结论:尽管在某些血液学参数中观察到显著差异,但CBC和ABO血型不能单独用于乳腺癌患者的诊断目的。将血液学实验室标志物与其他临床和诊断数据相结合对于提高诊断可靠性至关重要。这项工作强调了癌症诊断的复杂性和进一步研究开发综合预测模型的必要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Clinical laboratory
Clinical laboratory 医学-医学实验技术
CiteScore
1.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
494
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Clinical Laboratory is an international fully peer-reviewed journal covering all aspects of laboratory medicine and transfusion medicine. In addition to transfusion medicine topics Clinical Laboratory represents submissions concerning tissue transplantation and hematopoietic, cellular and gene therapies. The journal publishes original articles, review articles, posters, short reports, case studies and letters to the editor dealing with 1) the scientific background, implementation and diagnostic significance of laboratory methods employed in hospitals, blood banks and physicians'' offices and with 2) scientific, administrative and clinical aspects of transfusion medicine and 3) in addition to transfusion medicine topics Clinical Laboratory represents submissions concerning tissue transplantation and hematopoietic, cellular and gene therapies.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信