Extended Blood Group Genotyping Among Thai Patients with Repeated Transfusions

IF 0.6 4区 医学 Q4 MEDICAL LABORATORY TECHNOLOGY
Oytip Nathalang, Piyathida Khumsuk, Kamphon Intharanut, Tanaporn Choychimplee, Wiradee Sasikarn
{"title":"Extended Blood Group Genotyping Among Thai Patients with Repeated Transfusions","authors":"Oytip Nathalang, Piyathida Khumsuk, Kamphon Intharanut, Tanaporn Choychimplee, Wiradee Sasikarn","doi":"10.7754/Clin.Lab.2025.250134","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Transfusion of antigen-negative red blood cells (RBCs) is required for patients with chronic transfusions. Due to serological test limitations, genotyping is implemented to find appropriate and compatible blood units. This study aimed to determine extended blood group genotypes to identify antibody specificity and to establish appropriate typing for Thai patients with repeated transfusions.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Blood samples obtained from 200 unrelated Thai patients with repeated transfusions, at the Thammasat University Hospital, Pathum Thani, Thailand, were included. The patients had recently received at least three units of donor RBCs within 3 to 12 weeks at the time of blood collection. Extended blood group genotyping using the PCR-sequence-specific primer technique determined KEL*03, KEL*04, DI*A, DI*B, DO*A, DO*B, CO*A, CO*B, CROM*01.12, and CROM*01.-12 alleles.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 200 patients, no significant difference was found between male and female ratios (p > 0.05). Concerning the antibody production divided by patients' diagnoses, we found that only 2 patients with chronic kidney disease, CKD, (6.3%) had significantly lower antibody detection than patients with thalassemia, hematological and other malignancies, and other disorders (p < 0.05). Based on extended blood group allele patterns among 200 patients and 500 donors, the two common allele patterns were first: KEL*04, DI*B, DO*B, CO*A, and CROM*01.12 (75.0 vs. 71.0%), and second: KEL*04, DI*B, DO*A, DO*B, CO*A, and CROM*01.12 (18.0 vs. 21.6%), consistent with the donor population. As a result, this patient group showed a high chance of identifying matched donors and a low risk of alloimmunization. The prevalence of the DI*A/DI*B heterozygote was observed at 4.6% among 500 donors, corresponding to the high prevalence of anti-Dia in the patient group. Therefore, extended blood group genotypes, particularly the common significant blood group antigens in populations, are helpful among patients requiring repeated transfusions.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Extended blood group genotyping among patients with repeated transfusions should be performed to select antigen-negative RBC transfusions. However, the prevalence of antibody production and the additional blood group antigens corresponding to high-prevalent antibody identification among Thai patients should be a concern in proper blood group selection.</p>","PeriodicalId":10384,"journal":{"name":"Clinical laboratory","volume":"71 8","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical laboratory","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7754/Clin.Lab.2025.250134","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"MEDICAL LABORATORY TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Transfusion of antigen-negative red blood cells (RBCs) is required for patients with chronic transfusions. Due to serological test limitations, genotyping is implemented to find appropriate and compatible blood units. This study aimed to determine extended blood group genotypes to identify antibody specificity and to establish appropriate typing for Thai patients with repeated transfusions.

Methods: Blood samples obtained from 200 unrelated Thai patients with repeated transfusions, at the Thammasat University Hospital, Pathum Thani, Thailand, were included. The patients had recently received at least three units of donor RBCs within 3 to 12 weeks at the time of blood collection. Extended blood group genotyping using the PCR-sequence-specific primer technique determined KEL*03, KEL*04, DI*A, DI*B, DO*A, DO*B, CO*A, CO*B, CROM*01.12, and CROM*01.-12 alleles.

Results: Among 200 patients, no significant difference was found between male and female ratios (p > 0.05). Concerning the antibody production divided by patients' diagnoses, we found that only 2 patients with chronic kidney disease, CKD, (6.3%) had significantly lower antibody detection than patients with thalassemia, hematological and other malignancies, and other disorders (p < 0.05). Based on extended blood group allele patterns among 200 patients and 500 donors, the two common allele patterns were first: KEL*04, DI*B, DO*B, CO*A, and CROM*01.12 (75.0 vs. 71.0%), and second: KEL*04, DI*B, DO*A, DO*B, CO*A, and CROM*01.12 (18.0 vs. 21.6%), consistent with the donor population. As a result, this patient group showed a high chance of identifying matched donors and a low risk of alloimmunization. The prevalence of the DI*A/DI*B heterozygote was observed at 4.6% among 500 donors, corresponding to the high prevalence of anti-Dia in the patient group. Therefore, extended blood group genotypes, particularly the common significant blood group antigens in populations, are helpful among patients requiring repeated transfusions.

Conclusions: Extended blood group genotyping among patients with repeated transfusions should be performed to select antigen-negative RBC transfusions. However, the prevalence of antibody production and the additional blood group antigens corresponding to high-prevalent antibody identification among Thai patients should be a concern in proper blood group selection.

Oytip Nathalang, Piyathida Khumsuk, Kamphon Intharanut, Tanaporn Choychimplee, Wiradee Sasikarn。
背景:慢性输血患者需要输血抗原阴性红细胞(rbc)。由于血清学测试的限制,基因分型是为了找到合适的和兼容的血液单位。本研究旨在确定扩展血型基因型,以确定抗体特异性,并为反复输血的泰国患者建立适当的分型。方法:选取泰国巴吞他尼法政大学医院200例无血缘关系的反复输血患者的血液样本。这些患者最近在采血时的3至12周内接受了至少3个单位的供体红细胞。采用pcr序列特异性引物技术进行扩展血型基因分型,确定KEL*03、KEL*04、DI*A、DI*B、DO*A、DO*B、CO*A、CO*B、CROM*01.12和CROM*01。-12等位基因。结果:200例患者中,男女比例差异无统计学意义(p < 0.05)。在按患者诊断划分的抗体产生情况中,我们发现只有2例慢性肾脏疾病(CKD)患者(6.3%)的抗体检测明显低于地中海贫血、血液病和其他恶性肿瘤等疾病患者(p < 0.05)。根据200例患者和500例献血者的扩展血型等位基因模式,常见的两种等位基因模式分别为KEL*04、DI*B、DO*B、CO*A和CROM*01.12(75.0比71.0%)和KEL*04、DI*B、DO*A、DO*B、CO*A和CROM*01.12(18.0比21.6%),与献血者人群一致。因此,这组患者发现匹配供体的机会很高,异体免疫的风险很低。在500名献血者中,DI*A/DI*B杂合子的患病率为4.6%,对应于患者组中抗dia的高患病率。因此,扩展血型基因型,特别是人群中常见的重要血型抗原,对需要反复输血的患者是有帮助的。结论:反复输血患者应进行扩展血型基因分型,以选择抗原阴性的红细胞输注。然而,在泰国患者中,抗体产生的流行程度和与高流行抗体鉴定相对应的额外血型抗原应在适当的血型选择中得到关注。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Clinical laboratory
Clinical laboratory 医学-医学实验技术
CiteScore
1.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
494
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Clinical Laboratory is an international fully peer-reviewed journal covering all aspects of laboratory medicine and transfusion medicine. In addition to transfusion medicine topics Clinical Laboratory represents submissions concerning tissue transplantation and hematopoietic, cellular and gene therapies. The journal publishes original articles, review articles, posters, short reports, case studies and letters to the editor dealing with 1) the scientific background, implementation and diagnostic significance of laboratory methods employed in hospitals, blood banks and physicians'' offices and with 2) scientific, administrative and clinical aspects of transfusion medicine and 3) in addition to transfusion medicine topics Clinical Laboratory represents submissions concerning tissue transplantation and hematopoietic, cellular and gene therapies.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信