Application of Sigma Metrics for Assessing Analytical Performance of Drug Assay in Patient Care.

IF 0.6 4区 医学 Q4 MEDICAL LABORATORY TECHNOLOGY
Seema Patel, Preeti Chauhan, Ritu Singh
{"title":"Application of Sigma Metrics for Assessing Analytical Performance of Drug Assay in Patient Care.","authors":"Seema Patel, Preeti Chauhan, Ritu Singh","doi":"10.7754/Clin.Lab.2025.241044","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Clinical laboratories are indispensable in-patient care, particularly for conditions like epilepsy, where precise monitoring is vital. Phenytoin and valproate are commonly used antiepileptics. Sigma metrics may be utilized to monitor overall performance of diagnostic laboratories, ensuring accurate and reliable results. In this regard, our study aimed to evaluate the performance of Indiko Drug analyzer by using Sigma metrics based on different total allowable error (TEa) sources and to determine the consequences of these variations in Sigma metric evaluation.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>TEas of 25% and 15% requirements were selected from different industry standards to calculate Sigma metrics of drugs phenytoin and valproate. Coefficient of variation (CV) and bias records were taken from internal quality control (IQC) and external quality assessment scheme (EQAS), respectively.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>According to TEa based on different international bodies` database specifications of Sigma calculation, TEa 25% showed an average Sigma of both drugs greater than 6 (world class), compared to greater than 3 (marginally acceptable) for TEa 15%.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The study emphasizes the importance of thorough analysis and documentation in handling analytes with poor Sigma scores to mitigate laboratory errors and ensure reliability. It recommends root cause analysis and corrective action plans to achieve world-class Sigma goals. However, challenges remain in selecting the appropriate method for calculating Sigma metrics and TEa before harmonizing Sigma metrics across laboratories to minimize confusion.</p>","PeriodicalId":10384,"journal":{"name":"Clinical laboratory","volume":"71 8","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical laboratory","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7754/Clin.Lab.2025.241044","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"MEDICAL LABORATORY TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Clinical laboratories are indispensable in-patient care, particularly for conditions like epilepsy, where precise monitoring is vital. Phenytoin and valproate are commonly used antiepileptics. Sigma metrics may be utilized to monitor overall performance of diagnostic laboratories, ensuring accurate and reliable results. In this regard, our study aimed to evaluate the performance of Indiko Drug analyzer by using Sigma metrics based on different total allowable error (TEa) sources and to determine the consequences of these variations in Sigma metric evaluation.

Methods: TEas of 25% and 15% requirements were selected from different industry standards to calculate Sigma metrics of drugs phenytoin and valproate. Coefficient of variation (CV) and bias records were taken from internal quality control (IQC) and external quality assessment scheme (EQAS), respectively.

Results: According to TEa based on different international bodies` database specifications of Sigma calculation, TEa 25% showed an average Sigma of both drugs greater than 6 (world class), compared to greater than 3 (marginally acceptable) for TEa 15%.

Conclusions: The study emphasizes the importance of thorough analysis and documentation in handling analytes with poor Sigma scores to mitigate laboratory errors and ensure reliability. It recommends root cause analysis and corrective action plans to achieve world-class Sigma goals. However, challenges remain in selecting the appropriate method for calculating Sigma metrics and TEa before harmonizing Sigma metrics across laboratories to minimize confusion.

Sigma指标在病人护理中评估药物化验分析性能的应用。
背景:临床实验室是不可或缺的住院护理,特别是对于像癫痫这样的疾病,精确监测至关重要。苯妥英和丙戊酸是常用的抗癫痫药。西格玛指标可用于监测诊断实验室的整体表现,确保准确可靠的结果。在这方面,我们的研究旨在通过基于不同总允许误差(TEa)来源的Sigma指标来评价Indiko药物分析仪的性能,并确定这些差异对Sigma指标评价的影响。方法:从不同的行业标准中选取25%和15%要求的tea,计算苯妥英和丙戊酸的Sigma指标。变异系数(CV)和偏倚记录分别取自内部质量控制(IQC)和外部质量评价方案(EQAS)。结果:TEa根据不同国际机构数据库规范的Sigma计算,25%的TEa显示两种药物的平均Sigma大于6(世界级),而15%的TEa显示两种药物的平均Sigma大于3(勉强可接受)。结论:该研究强调了在处理低Sigma分数分析物时进行彻底分析和记录的重要性,以减少实验室错误并确保可靠性。它建议根本原因分析和纠正行动计划,以实现世界级的西格玛目标。然而,在协调跨实验室的Sigma度量以尽量减少混淆之前,在选择合适的方法来计算Sigma度量和TEa方面仍然存在挑战。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Clinical laboratory
Clinical laboratory 医学-医学实验技术
CiteScore
1.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
494
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Clinical Laboratory is an international fully peer-reviewed journal covering all aspects of laboratory medicine and transfusion medicine. In addition to transfusion medicine topics Clinical Laboratory represents submissions concerning tissue transplantation and hematopoietic, cellular and gene therapies. The journal publishes original articles, review articles, posters, short reports, case studies and letters to the editor dealing with 1) the scientific background, implementation and diagnostic significance of laboratory methods employed in hospitals, blood banks and physicians'' offices and with 2) scientific, administrative and clinical aspects of transfusion medicine and 3) in addition to transfusion medicine topics Clinical Laboratory represents submissions concerning tissue transplantation and hematopoietic, cellular and gene therapies.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信