Technical evaluation of Turbuhaler® use in children with bronchial asthma: combination of a checklist and inhalation parameters.

IF 2.8 3区 医学 Q2 RESPIRATORY SYSTEM
Lina Liang, Ruogang Huang, Yun Li, Zhufeng Wang, Kang Peng, Junfeng Lin, Feifei Huang, Xiaoyin Yao, Jinping Zheng, Yi Gao
{"title":"Technical evaluation of Turbuhaler<sup>®</sup> use in children with bronchial asthma: combination of a checklist and inhalation parameters.","authors":"Lina Liang, Ruogang Huang, Yun Li, Zhufeng Wang, Kang Peng, Junfeng Lin, Feifei Huang, Xiaoyin Yao, Jinping Zheng, Yi Gao","doi":"10.1186/s12890-025-03834-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The Turbuhaler<sup>®</sup> is a dry powder inhaler (DPI) that is commonly used in the treatment of asthmatic patients aged 5 years and above. Nevertheless, the technique of using the Turbuhaler<sup>®</sup> in the real world remains ambiguous. This study aims to evaluate techniques in using Turbuhaler<sup>®</sup> by combining a checklist with inhalation parameters and to investigate the association between the patient characteristics and inhaler technique.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study recruited asthmatic children aged 4 to 14 years who were using the Turbuhaler<sup>®</sup> from The First Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University from August 2023 to August 2024. The technique of using Turbuhaler<sup>®</sup> was evaluated step by step, and the inhalation parameters of patients were subsequently tested. Influencing factors related to inhaler technique were analyzed by ordered logistic regression analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 141 enrolled patients, 50 (35.5%) scored 10 points on the checklist. Overall, 105 (74.4%), 28 (19.9%) and 8 (5.7%) patients performed good, moderate, and poor inhaler technique, respectively. The three common improper steps were ''exhale to residual volume'' (35.5%), \"inhale forcefully and deeply\" (13.5%), \"rinse mouth after inhalation\" (13.5%). The three common inappropriate inhalation parameters were \"Effective inspiratory time(EIT) < 2s\" (90.8%), \"Peak inspiratory flow rate(PIFR) < 60L/min\" (41.8%), and \"Breath-hold time(BHT) < 5s\" (27.0%). In the three groups with good, moderate, poor inhaler techniques, 0, 2 (7.1%), and 2 (25.0%) patients did not reach the minimum PIFR. Meanwhile, 38 (36.2%), 15 (53.6%), and 6 (75.0%) patients did not reach the optimal PIFR, respectively. The results of ordered logistic regression analysis indicated that low medication adherence (P = 0.045), PIFR (P = 0.041), BHT (P = 0.003) and the duration of Turbuhaler<sup>®</sup> use (P = 0.009) were the primary factors influencing asthmatic children's inhaler technique.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The improper use of inhalers and inappropriate inhalation parameters are common among asthmatic children. Using checklist and inhalation parameters enables a more comprehensive evaluation of the patients' inhalation maneuvers and inspiratory effort.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>This study is registered at Chictr.org with the identifier number ChiCTR2200056579.</p>","PeriodicalId":9148,"journal":{"name":"BMC Pulmonary Medicine","volume":"25 1","pages":"381"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12333242/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Pulmonary Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12890-025-03834-3","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"RESPIRATORY SYSTEM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The Turbuhaler® is a dry powder inhaler (DPI) that is commonly used in the treatment of asthmatic patients aged 5 years and above. Nevertheless, the technique of using the Turbuhaler® in the real world remains ambiguous. This study aims to evaluate techniques in using Turbuhaler® by combining a checklist with inhalation parameters and to investigate the association between the patient characteristics and inhaler technique.

Methods: This study recruited asthmatic children aged 4 to 14 years who were using the Turbuhaler® from The First Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University from August 2023 to August 2024. The technique of using Turbuhaler® was evaluated step by step, and the inhalation parameters of patients were subsequently tested. Influencing factors related to inhaler technique were analyzed by ordered logistic regression analysis.

Results: Of the 141 enrolled patients, 50 (35.5%) scored 10 points on the checklist. Overall, 105 (74.4%), 28 (19.9%) and 8 (5.7%) patients performed good, moderate, and poor inhaler technique, respectively. The three common improper steps were ''exhale to residual volume'' (35.5%), "inhale forcefully and deeply" (13.5%), "rinse mouth after inhalation" (13.5%). The three common inappropriate inhalation parameters were "Effective inspiratory time(EIT) < 2s" (90.8%), "Peak inspiratory flow rate(PIFR) < 60L/min" (41.8%), and "Breath-hold time(BHT) < 5s" (27.0%). In the three groups with good, moderate, poor inhaler techniques, 0, 2 (7.1%), and 2 (25.0%) patients did not reach the minimum PIFR. Meanwhile, 38 (36.2%), 15 (53.6%), and 6 (75.0%) patients did not reach the optimal PIFR, respectively. The results of ordered logistic regression analysis indicated that low medication adherence (P = 0.045), PIFR (P = 0.041), BHT (P = 0.003) and the duration of Turbuhaler® use (P = 0.009) were the primary factors influencing asthmatic children's inhaler technique.

Conclusion: The improper use of inhalers and inappropriate inhalation parameters are common among asthmatic children. Using checklist and inhalation parameters enables a more comprehensive evaluation of the patients' inhalation maneuvers and inspiratory effort.

Trial registration: This study is registered at Chictr.org with the identifier number ChiCTR2200056579.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Turbuhaler®用于支气管哮喘儿童的技术评估:检查表和吸入参数的组合
背景:Turbuhaler®是一种干粉吸入器(DPI),通常用于治疗5岁及以上的哮喘患者。然而,在现实世界中使用Turbuhaler®的技术仍然模糊不清。本研究旨在通过结合检查表和吸入参数来评估使用Turbuhaler®的技术,并调查患者特征与吸入器技术之间的关系。方法:本研究招募于2023年8月至2024年8月在广州医科大学第一附属医院使用Turbuhaler®的4 ~ 14岁哮喘患儿。逐步评估使用Turbuhaler®的技术,并随后测试患者的吸入参数。采用有序logistic回归分析吸入器技术相关影响因素。结果:141例入组患者中,50例(35.5%)在检查表上得分为10分。总体而言,105例(74.4%)、28例(19.9%)和8例(5.7%)患者的吸入器技术表现良好、中等和较差。常见的3个不当步骤为“呼气至余量”(35.5%)、“用力深吸气”(13.5%)、“吸气后漱口”(13.5%)。有效吸气时间(EIT)®的使用(P = 0.009)是影响哮喘患儿吸入器使用的主要因素。结论:哮喘患儿吸入器使用不当、吸入参数不合理较为常见。使用检查表和吸入参数可以更全面地评估患者的吸入动作和吸气力度。试验注册:本研究在Chictr.org上注册,识别号为ChiCTR2200056579。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
BMC Pulmonary Medicine
BMC Pulmonary Medicine RESPIRATORY SYSTEM-
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
3.20%
发文量
423
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: BMC Pulmonary Medicine is an open access, peer-reviewed journal that considers articles on all aspects of the prevention, diagnosis and management of pulmonary and associated disorders, as well as related molecular genetics, pathophysiology, and epidemiology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信