Christian Braun, Lucie Krautova, Kathrin Schwedler, Corina Christmann, Christine Brambs
{"title":"Obstacles in genetic testing for germline BRCA1/2 pathogenic mutations in patients with primary breast and ovarian cancer in Switzerland","authors":"Christian Braun, Lucie Krautova, Kathrin Schwedler, Corina Christmann, Christine Brambs","doi":"10.1007/s00404-025-08138-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><p>Approximately 5–10% of breast and up to 25% of ovarian cancer cases are hereditary, predominantly associated with germline BRCA1/2 pathogenic variants. Identifying these mutations is essential for personalized treatment, prevention strategies, and cascade testing in families. However, integrating genetic testing into routine care faces substantial barriers globally and within Switzerland.</p><h3>Methods</h3><p>This retrospective, quantitative study analyzed 209 patients treated for non-mucinous ovarian carcinoma or primary breast cancer at the Women’s Cantonal Hospital, Lucerne (2017–2022). All patients met Swiss clinical (SAKK) criteria for genetic testing, and recommendations for counseling were documented. Data were collected via anonymized questionnaires evaluating demographics, counseling experiences, emotional responses, and testing barriers. Statistical analyses examined factors influencing counseling uptake, including timing, referral source, education, and informational resources.</p><h3>Results</h3><p>Out of 73 respondents (32.6% response rate), 70 questionnaires were analyzed. Acceptance of genetic counseling was 81.4%. Recommendations by gynecologists significantly enhanced uptake (<i>p</i> = 0.002), especially when provided postoperatively or at diagnosis (<i>p</i> = 0.011). Higher education levels (<i>p</i> = 0.009) and prior informational materials (<i>p</i> = 0.014) positively influenced acceptance. Emotional responses differed, with breast cancer patients reporting more fear, whereas ovarian cancer patients reported greater curiosity. Family involvement supported patient engagement, while perceptions of minimal personal benefit and family disinterest were common reasons for declining<b>.</b></p><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Timely, well-communicated recommendations and informational resources significantly improve genetic counseling uptake among breast and ovarian cancer patients. Addressing systemic and patient-specific barriers will enhance equitable access, optimize targeted therapies and preventive strategies, and should be supported by national registries, qualitative research, and digital integration.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":8330,"journal":{"name":"Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics","volume":"312 4","pages":"1365 - 1373"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s00404-025-08138-9.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00404-025-08138-9","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Purpose
Approximately 5–10% of breast and up to 25% of ovarian cancer cases are hereditary, predominantly associated with germline BRCA1/2 pathogenic variants. Identifying these mutations is essential for personalized treatment, prevention strategies, and cascade testing in families. However, integrating genetic testing into routine care faces substantial barriers globally and within Switzerland.
Methods
This retrospective, quantitative study analyzed 209 patients treated for non-mucinous ovarian carcinoma or primary breast cancer at the Women’s Cantonal Hospital, Lucerne (2017–2022). All patients met Swiss clinical (SAKK) criteria for genetic testing, and recommendations for counseling were documented. Data were collected via anonymized questionnaires evaluating demographics, counseling experiences, emotional responses, and testing barriers. Statistical analyses examined factors influencing counseling uptake, including timing, referral source, education, and informational resources.
Results
Out of 73 respondents (32.6% response rate), 70 questionnaires were analyzed. Acceptance of genetic counseling was 81.4%. Recommendations by gynecologists significantly enhanced uptake (p = 0.002), especially when provided postoperatively or at diagnosis (p = 0.011). Higher education levels (p = 0.009) and prior informational materials (p = 0.014) positively influenced acceptance. Emotional responses differed, with breast cancer patients reporting more fear, whereas ovarian cancer patients reported greater curiosity. Family involvement supported patient engagement, while perceptions of minimal personal benefit and family disinterest were common reasons for declining.
Conclusion
Timely, well-communicated recommendations and informational resources significantly improve genetic counseling uptake among breast and ovarian cancer patients. Addressing systemic and patient-specific barriers will enhance equitable access, optimize targeted therapies and preventive strategies, and should be supported by national registries, qualitative research, and digital integration.
期刊介绍:
Founded in 1870 as "Archiv für Gynaekologie", Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics has a long and outstanding tradition. Since 1922 the journal has been the Organ of the Deutsche Gesellschaft für Gynäkologie und Geburtshilfe. "The Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics" is circulated in over 40 countries world wide and is indexed in "PubMed/Medline" and "Science Citation Index Expanded/Journal Citation Report".
The journal publishes invited and submitted reviews; peer-reviewed original articles about clinical topics and basic research as well as news and views and guidelines and position statements from all sub-specialties in gynecology and obstetrics.