Experimental assessment of the combined exposure to methylmercury and nutritional stress on multiple reproductive endpoints on female zebrafish (Danio rerio).

IF 4.3 2区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 MARINE & FRESHWATER BIOLOGY
Aquatic Toxicology Pub Date : 2025-10-01 Epub Date: 2025-07-28 DOI:10.1016/j.aquatox.2025.107520
Telmo Portugal-Baranda, Maren Ortiz-Zarragoitia, Jabi Zabala
{"title":"Experimental assessment of the combined exposure to methylmercury and nutritional stress on multiple reproductive endpoints on female zebrafish (Danio rerio).","authors":"Telmo Portugal-Baranda, Maren Ortiz-Zarragoitia, Jabi Zabala","doi":"10.1016/j.aquatox.2025.107520","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Wildlife is exposed to contaminants in their environment and also to other stressors such as cold or low food availability. The consequences of exposure to some contaminants and stressors have been studied to some detail in laboratory conditions but mostly exposing wildlife to a single stressor, while the consequences of combined exposure to contaminants and other stressor remain mostly unexplored. We exposed 228 adult zebrafish to a sublethal dose of methylmercury (MeHg), a globally distributed contaminant, and food restriction, probably the most common environmental stressor, in four treatment groups: control, MeHg (5 ppm through diet), food reduction (25 % of control food mass) and the combination of MeHg and food reduction. Our hypothesis was that combined exposure will produce synergistic (interactive) effects different and more severe than the mere addition of the individual effects. We exposed fish for 43-day sublethal exposure, and allowed them three reproductive attempts, whose success we measured using seven reproductive endpoints. We assessed each endpoint with five competitive models: No effect; MeHg effect; food restriction effect; MeHg and food restriction additive effect; and MeHg and food restriction interactive effect. In six of the seven endpoints the evidence contained in the results supported the interactive effect, strongly supporting our hypothesis. In the remaining one, no effects was observed in any group. However, contrary to our expectation, the combined exposure treatment group produced more viable offspring than any other. We currently have no explanation for that result and argue that combined exposure might have triggered life history trade-offs. Further research on the longer term and assessing carry-over and inter-generational effects could improve our understanding of the consequences of combined exposure to MeHg and food restriction.</p>","PeriodicalId":248,"journal":{"name":"Aquatic Toxicology","volume":"287 ","pages":"107520"},"PeriodicalIF":4.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Aquatic Toxicology","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aquatox.2025.107520","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/7/28 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MARINE & FRESHWATER BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Wildlife is exposed to contaminants in their environment and also to other stressors such as cold or low food availability. The consequences of exposure to some contaminants and stressors have been studied to some detail in laboratory conditions but mostly exposing wildlife to a single stressor, while the consequences of combined exposure to contaminants and other stressor remain mostly unexplored. We exposed 228 adult zebrafish to a sublethal dose of methylmercury (MeHg), a globally distributed contaminant, and food restriction, probably the most common environmental stressor, in four treatment groups: control, MeHg (5 ppm through diet), food reduction (25 % of control food mass) and the combination of MeHg and food reduction. Our hypothesis was that combined exposure will produce synergistic (interactive) effects different and more severe than the mere addition of the individual effects. We exposed fish for 43-day sublethal exposure, and allowed them three reproductive attempts, whose success we measured using seven reproductive endpoints. We assessed each endpoint with five competitive models: No effect; MeHg effect; food restriction effect; MeHg and food restriction additive effect; and MeHg and food restriction interactive effect. In six of the seven endpoints the evidence contained in the results supported the interactive effect, strongly supporting our hypothesis. In the remaining one, no effects was observed in any group. However, contrary to our expectation, the combined exposure treatment group produced more viable offspring than any other. We currently have no explanation for that result and argue that combined exposure might have triggered life history trade-offs. Further research on the longer term and assessing carry-over and inter-generational effects could improve our understanding of the consequences of combined exposure to MeHg and food restriction.

甲基汞联合暴露和营养应激对雌性斑马鱼(Danio rerio)多个生殖终点的实验评估。
野生动物暴露于环境中的污染物,也暴露于其他压力因素,如寒冷或食物供应不足。暴露于某些污染物和压力源的后果已经在实验室条件下进行了一些详细的研究,但主要是将野生动物暴露于单一压力源,而同时暴露于污染物和其他压力源的后果仍未被探索。我们将228条成年斑马鱼暴露于亚致死剂量的甲基汞(MeHg)(一种全球分布的污染物)和食物限制(可能是最常见的环境压力源)中,分为四个处理组:对照组、甲基汞(通过饮食摄入5 ppm)、减少食物(控制食物量的25%)以及甲基汞和减少食物的组合。我们的假设是,联合暴露会产生协同(互动)效应,不同于单独的影响,而且更严重。我们将鱼暴露在43天的亚致死环境中,并允许它们进行三次繁殖尝试,我们用七个繁殖终点来衡量它们的成功程度。我们用五种竞争模型评估每个终点:无影响;MeHg效果;食物限制效应;甲基汞与限食添加剂效应;甲基汞与食物限制的交互作用。在七个终点中的六个,结果中包含的证据支持交互效应,有力地支持了我们的假设。在剩下的一组中,没有观察到任何组的影响。然而,与我们的预期相反,联合暴露治疗组产生的后代比其他任何组都多。我们目前无法解释这一结果,并认为综合暴露可能会引发生活史的权衡。进一步的长期研究和评估携带和代际影响,可以提高我们对甲基汞和食物限制联合暴露的后果的理解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Aquatic Toxicology
Aquatic Toxicology 环境科学-毒理学
CiteScore
7.10
自引率
4.40%
发文量
250
审稿时长
56 days
期刊介绍: Aquatic Toxicology publishes significant contributions that increase the understanding of the impact of harmful substances (including natural and synthetic chemicals) on aquatic organisms and ecosystems. Aquatic Toxicology considers both laboratory and field studies with a focus on marine/ freshwater environments. We strive to attract high quality original scientific papers, critical reviews and expert opinion papers in the following areas: Effects of harmful substances on molecular, cellular, sub-organismal, organismal, population, community, and ecosystem level; Toxic Mechanisms; Genetic disturbances, transgenerational effects, behavioral and adaptive responses; Impacts of harmful substances on structure, function of and services provided by aquatic ecosystems; Mixture toxicity assessment; Statistical approaches to predict exposure to and hazards of contaminants The journal also considers manuscripts in other areas, such as the development of innovative concepts, approaches, and methodologies, which promote the wider application of toxicological datasets to the protection of aquatic environments and inform ecological risk assessments and decision making by relevant authorities.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信