Effect of Everyday Life Rehabilitation on recovering quality of life in individuals with serious mental illness in supported accommodation: a pragmatic cluster randomised controlled trial.

IF 4.9 0 PSYCHIATRY
André Sjöberg,Per Liv,Maria Lindström
{"title":"Effect of Everyday Life Rehabilitation on recovering quality of life in individuals with serious mental illness in supported accommodation: a pragmatic cluster randomised controlled trial.","authors":"André Sjöberg,Per Liv,Maria Lindström","doi":"10.1136/bmjment-2025-301757","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"BACKGROUND\r\nIndividuals with serious mental illness (SMI) living in supported accommodation often lead lonely and sedentary lives. Everyday Life Rehabilitation (ELR) is a collaborative, person-centred, activity-oriented and recovery-oriented intervention that integrates outreach rehabilitation efforts into routine practices. This intervention aims to enhance personal recovery and quality of life by promoting engagement in meaningful everyday activities within real-life contexts.\r\n\r\nOBJECTIVE\r\nTo evaluate the effectiveness of ELR on personal recovery and quality of life among residents with SMI in supported accommodation, compared with treatment-as-usual (TAU).\r\n\r\nMETHODS\r\nThis was a pragmatic, parallel-group, cluster-randomised controlled trial (RCT) (NCT05056415) conducted in Sweden between August 2021 and June 2024. The RCT included 60 housing units (clusters) randomly assigned (1:1) to receive either ELR or TAU. Data were collected by independent, blinded assessors, with partial blinding of residents. The primary outcome, Recovering Quality of Life (ReQoL-20), was assessed at the individual level and analysed using a mixed-effects model and an intention-to-treat (ITT) approach by a statistician blinded to the allocation.\r\n\r\nFINDINGS\r\nParticipants in the intervention group showed significantly greater improvements in ReQoL scores at 6 months compared with the control group (20.1, 95% CI: 15.8 to 24.4), with a statistically significant between-group difference (p<0.001). The ITT analysis included 60 housing units with 161 participants (86 men and 72 women), of whom 90 were allocated to ELR (33 units) and 71 to TAU (27 units). The overall attrition rate was 24% in both groups, and no major adverse events were reported.\r\n\r\nCONCLUSIONS\r\nThese findings indicate that ELR is an effective intervention with a clinically relevant impact on recovering quality of life for individuals with SMI living in supported accommodation. While these results should be interpreted within the context of the Swedish system, they contribute to the growing body of evidence supporting recovery-oriented and activity-oriented interventions in supported accommodation.\r\n\r\nCLINICAL IMPLICATIONS\r\nResponsive, person-centred, goal-oriented activity training, grounded in collaborative alliance, represents a valid strategy for recovery-oriented interventions. While multilevel approaches must be tailored to specific contexts, the integration of occupational therapists may provide clinical benefits in supported accommodation.\r\n\r\nTRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER\r\nNCT05056415.","PeriodicalId":72434,"journal":{"name":"BMJ mental health","volume":"14 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMJ mental health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjment-2025-301757","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

BACKGROUND Individuals with serious mental illness (SMI) living in supported accommodation often lead lonely and sedentary lives. Everyday Life Rehabilitation (ELR) is a collaborative, person-centred, activity-oriented and recovery-oriented intervention that integrates outreach rehabilitation efforts into routine practices. This intervention aims to enhance personal recovery and quality of life by promoting engagement in meaningful everyday activities within real-life contexts. OBJECTIVE To evaluate the effectiveness of ELR on personal recovery and quality of life among residents with SMI in supported accommodation, compared with treatment-as-usual (TAU). METHODS This was a pragmatic, parallel-group, cluster-randomised controlled trial (RCT) (NCT05056415) conducted in Sweden between August 2021 and June 2024. The RCT included 60 housing units (clusters) randomly assigned (1:1) to receive either ELR or TAU. Data were collected by independent, blinded assessors, with partial blinding of residents. The primary outcome, Recovering Quality of Life (ReQoL-20), was assessed at the individual level and analysed using a mixed-effects model and an intention-to-treat (ITT) approach by a statistician blinded to the allocation. FINDINGS Participants in the intervention group showed significantly greater improvements in ReQoL scores at 6 months compared with the control group (20.1, 95% CI: 15.8 to 24.4), with a statistically significant between-group difference (p<0.001). The ITT analysis included 60 housing units with 161 participants (86 men and 72 women), of whom 90 were allocated to ELR (33 units) and 71 to TAU (27 units). The overall attrition rate was 24% in both groups, and no major adverse events were reported. CONCLUSIONS These findings indicate that ELR is an effective intervention with a clinically relevant impact on recovering quality of life for individuals with SMI living in supported accommodation. While these results should be interpreted within the context of the Swedish system, they contribute to the growing body of evidence supporting recovery-oriented and activity-oriented interventions in supported accommodation. CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS Responsive, person-centred, goal-oriented activity training, grounded in collaborative alliance, represents a valid strategy for recovery-oriented interventions. While multilevel approaches must be tailored to specific contexts, the integration of occupational therapists may provide clinical benefits in supported accommodation. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER NCT05056415.
日常生活康复对支持住宿的严重精神疾病患者恢复生活质量的影响:一项实用的聚类随机对照试验
患有严重精神疾病(SMI)的人生活在支持的住宿中,往往过着孤独和久坐不动的生活。日常生活康复(ELR)是一种协作性的、以人为本的、以活动为导向的、以康复为导向的干预,它将外展康复工作纳入日常实践。这种干预旨在通过促进在现实生活中有意义的日常活动的参与来提高个人的康复和生活质量。目的评价ELR与常规治疗(TAU)相比,对支持型住宿重度精神障碍患者个人康复和生活质量的影响。方法:这是一项实用的、平行组、集群随机对照试验(RCT) (NCT05056415),于2021年8月至2024年6月在瑞典进行。随机对照试验包括60个住房单元(组),随机分配(1:1)接受ELR或TAU。数据由独立的盲法评估者收集,对居民进行部分盲法评估。主要结局是恢复生活质量(ReQoL-20),在个体水平上进行评估,并由统计学家使用混合效应模型和意向治疗(ITT)方法进行分析。结果干预组患者在6个月时的ReQoL评分较对照组有显著提高(20.1,95% CI: 15.8 ~ 24.4),组间差异有统计学意义(p<0.001)。ITT分析包括60个住房单元,161名参与者(86名男性和72名女性),其中90名分配给ELR(33个单元),71名分配给TAU(27个单元)。两组患者的总流失率均为24%,无重大不良事件报告。结论:ELR是一种有效的干预措施,对生活在支持性住宿中的重度精神障碍患者的生活质量恢复具有临床相关的影响。虽然这些结果应该在瑞典系统的背景下解释,但它们有助于越来越多的证据支持在支持住宿中以恢复为导向和以活动为导向的干预措施。临床意义响应性的、以人为本的、目标导向的活动训练,以协作联盟为基础,代表了一种有效的康复导向干预策略。虽然多层次的方法必须根据具体情况量身定制,但职业治疗师的整合可能会在支持住宿方面提供临床益处。试验注册号05056415。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信