The Human Rights Challenges Experienced by Queer Youth in Out-of-Home Care: A Systematic Scoping Review.

IF 5.4 1区 社会学 Q1 CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY
Oscar Johnston,Lynne McPherson,Kathomi Gatwiri,Antonia Canosa
{"title":"The Human Rights Challenges Experienced by Queer Youth in Out-of-Home Care: A Systematic Scoping Review.","authors":"Oscar Johnston,Lynne McPherson,Kathomi Gatwiri,Antonia Canosa","doi":"10.1177/15248380251355892","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The human rights challenges faced by Queer youth in out-of-home care (OOHC), such as foster and residential care, have largely been overlooked in child protection research, policy, and practice development. This systematic scoping review aims to identify and synthesize the existing international, English-language, empirical research documenting the human rights challenges experienced by Queer youth in OOHC systems. This review followed the Joanna Briggs Institute methodological guidance for scoping reviews. Seven electronic databases were searched to locate relevant articles, including Academic Search Premier, APA PsycInfo, CINAHL, MEDLINE, PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science. Initially, 1,384 studies were identified, with 50 meeting the inclusion criteria for the review. Braun and Clarke's reflexive thematic analysis was used to synthesize the data and identify key themes. The five core themes identified were as follows: (a) sexual orientation, gender identity, and gender expression (SOGIE)-based rejection and harm before entering OOHC, (b) SOGIE-based discrimination and harm in OOHC, (c) structural disadvantage and exclusion, (d) mental health and social well-being disparities, and (e) social and relational issues. There are considerable gaps in the published research documenting the human rights experiences of Queer youth in OOHC systems outside of the United States. Heterocisnormative child protection ideologies and systemic issues, including constraints limiting SOGIE data acquisition, work to oppress Queer youth in OOHC, diminishing the quality of their care experience. These structural and systemic issues are the catalysts for SOGIE-based discrimination and harm experienced by Queer youth in care.","PeriodicalId":54211,"journal":{"name":"Trauma Violence & Abuse","volume":"4 1","pages":"15248380251355892"},"PeriodicalIF":5.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Trauma Violence & Abuse","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/15248380251355892","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The human rights challenges faced by Queer youth in out-of-home care (OOHC), such as foster and residential care, have largely been overlooked in child protection research, policy, and practice development. This systematic scoping review aims to identify and synthesize the existing international, English-language, empirical research documenting the human rights challenges experienced by Queer youth in OOHC systems. This review followed the Joanna Briggs Institute methodological guidance for scoping reviews. Seven electronic databases were searched to locate relevant articles, including Academic Search Premier, APA PsycInfo, CINAHL, MEDLINE, PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science. Initially, 1,384 studies were identified, with 50 meeting the inclusion criteria for the review. Braun and Clarke's reflexive thematic analysis was used to synthesize the data and identify key themes. The five core themes identified were as follows: (a) sexual orientation, gender identity, and gender expression (SOGIE)-based rejection and harm before entering OOHC, (b) SOGIE-based discrimination and harm in OOHC, (c) structural disadvantage and exclusion, (d) mental health and social well-being disparities, and (e) social and relational issues. There are considerable gaps in the published research documenting the human rights experiences of Queer youth in OOHC systems outside of the United States. Heterocisnormative child protection ideologies and systemic issues, including constraints limiting SOGIE data acquisition, work to oppress Queer youth in OOHC, diminishing the quality of their care experience. These structural and systemic issues are the catalysts for SOGIE-based discrimination and harm experienced by Queer youth in care.
酷儿青少年在家庭外照顾中所经历的人权挑战:一个系统的范围审查。
在儿童保护研究、政策和实践发展中,酷儿青少年在家庭外照料(OOHC)中面临的人权挑战,如寄养和寄宿照料,在很大程度上被忽视了。这篇系统性的范围审查旨在识别和综合现有的国际、英语、实证研究,这些研究记录了在OOHC系统中酷儿青年所面临的人权挑战。这篇综述遵循了乔安娜布里格斯研究所关于范围界定综述的方法指导。我们检索了7个电子数据库,包括Academic Search Premier、APA PsycInfo、CINAHL、MEDLINE、PubMed、Scopus和Web of Science。最初,确定了1384项研究,其中50项符合纳入标准。Braun和Clarke的反身性主题分析用于综合数据并确定关键主题。确定的五个核心主题如下:(a)进入OOHC之前基于性取向、性别认同和性别表达(SOGIE)的排斥和伤害,(b) OOHC中基于SOGIE的歧视和伤害,(c)结构性劣势和排斥,(d)心理健康和社会福祉差距,以及(e)社会和关系问题。在美国以外的OOHC系统中,已发表的关于酷儿青年人权经历的研究存在相当大的差距。异性恋规范的儿童保护意识形态和系统问题,包括限制SOGIE数据获取的限制,对OOHC中酷儿青年的压迫,降低了他们的护理体验质量。这些结构性和系统性的问题是基于sogi的歧视和伤害的催化剂,酷儿青年在照顾中经历。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
13.60
自引率
7.80%
发文量
131
期刊介绍: Trauma, Violence, & Abuse is devoted to organizing, synthesizing, and expanding knowledge on all force of trauma, abuse, and violence. This peer-reviewed journal is practitioner oriented and will publish only reviews of research, conceptual or theoretical articles, and law review articles. Trauma, Violence, & Abuse is dedicated to professionals and advanced students in clinical training who work with any form of trauma, abuse, and violence. It is intended to compile knowledge that clearly affects practice, policy, and research.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信