[Acute pancreatitis: Progress through Restraint?]

IF 0.7
Deutsche medizinische Wochenschrift (1946) Pub Date : 2025-08-01 Epub Date: 2025-08-07 DOI:10.1055/a-2286-0469
Jonathan Frederik Brozat, Frank Tacke
{"title":"[Acute pancreatitis: Progress through Restraint?]","authors":"Jonathan Frederik Brozat, Frank Tacke","doi":"10.1055/a-2286-0469","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Acute pancreatitis (AP) is a potentially life-threatening disease, often progressing in 2 phases: initial sterile inflammation, followed by later infected necrosis. Advances in care have shifted management toward a minimally invasive, step-up approach. AP is diagnosed based on typical abdominal pain, elevated lipase, or characteristic imaging - amylase is no longer essential. In hypertriglyceridemic AP, plasmapheresis offers no proven benefit. (Endo)sonography is mandatory. Contrast-enhanced CT should be delayed unless necrosis is suspected or diagnosis remains uncertain; optimal timing is ≥72h, ideally after 7 days. Prognostic tools (BISAP, Ranson) and markers (hematocrit, lactate, BUN) are insufficient to predict severe or necrotizing AP. Post-hoc, the revised Atlanta classification may be more effective than the determinant-based classification. Emergency ERC (<24h) is only warranted in cholangitis. Without cholangitis, ERC within 72h is adequate; biliary sphincterotomy and pancreatic stenting reduce post-ERC pancreatitis. Opioids are superior to NSAIDs and are first-line for analgesia. Early, goal-directed fluid resuscitation with balanced crystalloids improves outcomes, while excessive fluids (>3mL/kg/h) should be avoided. Enteral/oral nutrition within 24h reduces the risk of infected necrosis and is preferred over parenteral feeding. Antibiotic prophylaxis is not recommended, even in necrotizing AP; infected necrosis is rare in the first 2 weeks. Procalcitonin may support therapeutic decisions. Necrosis should be managed stepwise: antibiotics, then drainage, then delayed minimally-invasive necrosectomy. Endoscopic access is preferred; open surgery is obsolete. Outcomes improve significantly in specialized, high-volume centers with critical care, interventional endoscopy/radiology, and pancreatic surgery expertise.</p>","PeriodicalId":93975,"journal":{"name":"Deutsche medizinische Wochenschrift (1946)","volume":"150 17","pages":"1027-1033"},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Deutsche medizinische Wochenschrift (1946)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2286-0469","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/8/7 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Acute pancreatitis (AP) is a potentially life-threatening disease, often progressing in 2 phases: initial sterile inflammation, followed by later infected necrosis. Advances in care have shifted management toward a minimally invasive, step-up approach. AP is diagnosed based on typical abdominal pain, elevated lipase, or characteristic imaging - amylase is no longer essential. In hypertriglyceridemic AP, plasmapheresis offers no proven benefit. (Endo)sonography is mandatory. Contrast-enhanced CT should be delayed unless necrosis is suspected or diagnosis remains uncertain; optimal timing is ≥72h, ideally after 7 days. Prognostic tools (BISAP, Ranson) and markers (hematocrit, lactate, BUN) are insufficient to predict severe or necrotizing AP. Post-hoc, the revised Atlanta classification may be more effective than the determinant-based classification. Emergency ERC (<24h) is only warranted in cholangitis. Without cholangitis, ERC within 72h is adequate; biliary sphincterotomy and pancreatic stenting reduce post-ERC pancreatitis. Opioids are superior to NSAIDs and are first-line for analgesia. Early, goal-directed fluid resuscitation with balanced crystalloids improves outcomes, while excessive fluids (>3mL/kg/h) should be avoided. Enteral/oral nutrition within 24h reduces the risk of infected necrosis and is preferred over parenteral feeding. Antibiotic prophylaxis is not recommended, even in necrotizing AP; infected necrosis is rare in the first 2 weeks. Procalcitonin may support therapeutic decisions. Necrosis should be managed stepwise: antibiotics, then drainage, then delayed minimally-invasive necrosectomy. Endoscopic access is preferred; open surgery is obsolete. Outcomes improve significantly in specialized, high-volume centers with critical care, interventional endoscopy/radiology, and pancreatic surgery expertise.

急性胰腺炎:通过克制的进展?]
急性胰腺炎(AP)是一种潜在的危及生命的疾病,通常分为两个阶段:最初的无菌炎症,随后是感染坏死。在护理方面的进步已经将管理转向微创,逐步的方法。AP的诊断是基于典型的腹痛、脂肪酶升高或特征性影像学——淀粉酶不再是必需的。在高甘油三酯血症AP中,血浆置换没有证实的益处。(远藤)超声检查是强制性的。除非怀疑坏死或诊断不明确,否则应延迟CT增强检查;最佳时间≥72h, 7天后为最佳。预后工具(BISAP, Ranson)和标记物(红细胞压积,乳酸,BUN)不足以预测严重或坏死性AP。事后,修订的亚特兰大分类可能比基于决定因素的分类更有效。应避免紧急ERC (3mL/kg/h)。24小时内肠内/口服营养可降低感染坏死的风险,比肠外喂养更可取。即使是坏死性AP,也不建议使用抗生素预防;感染性坏死在头两周内是罕见的。降钙素原可能支持治疗决策。坏死应逐步处理:抗生素,然后引流,然后延迟微创坏死切除术。首选内镜通道;开放手术已经过时了。在具有重症监护、介入内镜/放射学和胰腺外科专业知识的专业、大容量中心,结果显著改善。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信