A Three-Tiered Faculty Engagement Programme to Support Resident Scholarship

IF 1.2 Q4 MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL
Clinical Teacher Pub Date : 2025-08-08 DOI:10.1111/tct.70175
Radhika Narla, Whitney Harper, Gabrielle Berger
{"title":"A Three-Tiered Faculty Engagement Programme to Support Resident Scholarship","authors":"Radhika Narla,&nbsp;Whitney Harper,&nbsp;Gabrielle Berger","doi":"10.1111/tct.70175","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>Residency training represents critical opportunities for scholarly engagement; however, establishing and sustaining effective mentorship for resident research are challenging. In 2007, our internal medicine residency programme developed RAMP (Resident Advising and Mentorship Program) to provide structured mentorship in research and career exploration. A confluence of factors resulted in RAMP stagnating over time, prompting a strategic redesign to meet evolving resident needs.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Approach</h3>\n \n <p>In 2023, we systematically assessed residents' mentorship needs and critical changes in the subspecialty fellowship landscape. We refocused RAMP on helping residents engage with research projects through an innovative three-tiered faculty model. Faculty roles were redefined as Connectors (senior faculty familiar with divisional research portfolios, facilitating connections to project mentors), Project Mentors (faculty guiding residents on specific research projects) and Fellowship Coaches (junior faculty supporting fellowship applications and interview preparation).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Evaluation</h3>\n \n <p>Among 41 residents participating in RAMP (AY23–24), 28 responded to the survey for a 68% response rate. Most (25/28, 89%) were successfully paired with a mentor. Postimplementation surveys underscored the importance of residents meeting multiple faculty before identifying mentors and projects aligned with their goals. The redesign yielded valuable scholarly productivity, with 27 out of 28 respondents reporting progress on academic outputs.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Implications</h3>\n \n <p>The revitalised RAMP model has fundamentally transformed faculty–resident mentorship, fostering a structured, scalable approach to research engagement and fellowship advising. By clearly defining mentorship roles and streamlining faculty involvement, RAMP has enhanced resident scholarship productivity and research mentorship and built a sustainable framework adaptable to other residency programmes.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":47324,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Teacher","volume":"22 5","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Teacher","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://asmepublications.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/tct.70175","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Residency training represents critical opportunities for scholarly engagement; however, establishing and sustaining effective mentorship for resident research are challenging. In 2007, our internal medicine residency programme developed RAMP (Resident Advising and Mentorship Program) to provide structured mentorship in research and career exploration. A confluence of factors resulted in RAMP stagnating over time, prompting a strategic redesign to meet evolving resident needs.

Approach

In 2023, we systematically assessed residents' mentorship needs and critical changes in the subspecialty fellowship landscape. We refocused RAMP on helping residents engage with research projects through an innovative three-tiered faculty model. Faculty roles were redefined as Connectors (senior faculty familiar with divisional research portfolios, facilitating connections to project mentors), Project Mentors (faculty guiding residents on specific research projects) and Fellowship Coaches (junior faculty supporting fellowship applications and interview preparation).

Evaluation

Among 41 residents participating in RAMP (AY23–24), 28 responded to the survey for a 68% response rate. Most (25/28, 89%) were successfully paired with a mentor. Postimplementation surveys underscored the importance of residents meeting multiple faculty before identifying mentors and projects aligned with their goals. The redesign yielded valuable scholarly productivity, with 27 out of 28 respondents reporting progress on academic outputs.

Implications

The revitalised RAMP model has fundamentally transformed faculty–resident mentorship, fostering a structured, scalable approach to research engagement and fellowship advising. By clearly defining mentorship roles and streamlining faculty involvement, RAMP has enhanced resident scholarship productivity and research mentorship and built a sustainable framework adaptable to other residency programmes.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

一个三级教师参与计划,以支持居民奖学金。
背景:住院医师培训是学术参与的重要机会;然而,建立和维持有效的指导居民的研究是具有挑战性的。2007年,我们的内科住院医师计划开发了RAMP(住院医师咨询和指导计划),为研究和职业探索提供结构化的指导。随着时间的推移,一系列因素导致RAMP停滞不前,因此需要进行战略性的重新设计,以满足不断变化的居民需求。方法:在2023年,我们系统地评估了住院医生的指导需求和亚专科奖学金格局的关键变化。我们重新将RAMP的重点放在通过创新的三层教师模式帮助居民参与研究项目上。教师的角色被重新定义为连接器(熟悉部门研究组合的高级教师,促进与项目导师的联系),项目导师(指导特定研究项目的住院医生的教师)和奖学金教练(支持奖学金申请和面试准备的初级教师)。评估:在参与RAMP (AY23-24)的41位居民中,28位回应了调查,回复率为68%。大多数(25/ 28,89%)成功地与导师配对。实施后的调查强调了住院医生在确定导师和符合他们目标的项目之前与多个教员会面的重要性。重新设计产生了宝贵的学术生产力,28个受访者中有27个报告了学术产出的进展。启示:重新焕发活力的RAMP模式从根本上改变了教师常驻指导,培养了一种结构化的、可扩展的研究参与和奖学金建议方法。通过明确定义指导角色和简化教师参与,RAMP提高了居民奖学金的生产力和研究指导,并建立了一个适用于其他居住计划的可持续框架。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Clinical Teacher
Clinical Teacher MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL-
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
5.60%
发文量
113
期刊介绍: The Clinical Teacher has been designed with the active, practising clinician in mind. It aims to provide a digest of current research, practice and thinking in medical education presented in a readable, stimulating and practical style. The journal includes sections for reviews of the literature relating to clinical teaching bringing authoritative views on the latest thinking about modern teaching. There are also sections on specific teaching approaches, a digest of the latest research published in Medical Education and other teaching journals, reports of initiatives and advances in thinking and practical teaching from around the world, and expert community and discussion on challenging and controversial issues in today"s clinical education.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信