The interaction among household chaos, parental rejection, and parental control in predicting adolescent executive function.

IF 3.1 2区 心理学 Q2 PSYCHOLOGY, DEVELOPMENTAL
Yelim Hong, Ann E Folker, Kirby Deater-Deckard, Ann T Skinner, Laurence Steinberg, Marc H Bornstein, Kenneth A Dodge, Jennifer E Lansford
{"title":"The interaction among household chaos, parental rejection, and parental control in predicting adolescent executive function.","authors":"Yelim Hong, Ann E Folker, Kirby Deater-Deckard, Ann T Skinner, Laurence Steinberg, Marc H Bornstein, Kenneth A Dodge, Jennifer E Lansford","doi":"10.1037/dev0002039","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The present study examines the interaction between household chaos, parental control, and parental rejection/acceptance (i.e., warmth) in predicting adolescent executive function (EF) skills in a diverse sample. We tested a three-way interaction to understand the direct and interactive effects of household chaos, parental control, and parental rejection/acceptance on adolescent EF within a short-term longitudinal study design. Participants were 14- to 15-year-olds and their parents (<i>n</i> = 220 mother-adolescent dyads, <i>n</i> = 139 father-adolescent dyads, 48% females) from approximately equal numbers of African American (34%), Hispanic American (36%), and European American (29%) U.S. families. Mothers, fathers, and adolescents completed interviews and questionnaires, and adolescents completed EF tasks of cognitive control. Better adolescent EF was predicted by lower level household chaos, but no main effects of adolescent perceptions of control or rejection on adolescent EF were observed. For mothers, only a three-way interaction emerged among controlling behavior, rejection, and household chaos: Among mothers who showed higher levels of rejection (i.e., low warmth) toward their adolescents, the negative association between controlling behavior and adolescent EF was significant in more chaotic households. In contrast, no association between maternal controlling behavior and adolescent EF emerged in less chaotic households regardless of the extent of maternal rejection. When multiple risk factors such as maternal rejection and household chaos coexist, the detrimental impact of maternal controlling behavior on adolescent EF becomes pronounced. No similar effect emerged for fathers, suggesting that these processes may be specific to the mother-adolescent relationship. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":48464,"journal":{"name":"Developmental Psychology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12333542/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Developmental Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1037/dev0002039","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, DEVELOPMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The present study examines the interaction between household chaos, parental control, and parental rejection/acceptance (i.e., warmth) in predicting adolescent executive function (EF) skills in a diverse sample. We tested a three-way interaction to understand the direct and interactive effects of household chaos, parental control, and parental rejection/acceptance on adolescent EF within a short-term longitudinal study design. Participants were 14- to 15-year-olds and their parents (n = 220 mother-adolescent dyads, n = 139 father-adolescent dyads, 48% females) from approximately equal numbers of African American (34%), Hispanic American (36%), and European American (29%) U.S. families. Mothers, fathers, and adolescents completed interviews and questionnaires, and adolescents completed EF tasks of cognitive control. Better adolescent EF was predicted by lower level household chaos, but no main effects of adolescent perceptions of control or rejection on adolescent EF were observed. For mothers, only a three-way interaction emerged among controlling behavior, rejection, and household chaos: Among mothers who showed higher levels of rejection (i.e., low warmth) toward their adolescents, the negative association between controlling behavior and adolescent EF was significant in more chaotic households. In contrast, no association between maternal controlling behavior and adolescent EF emerged in less chaotic households regardless of the extent of maternal rejection. When multiple risk factors such as maternal rejection and household chaos coexist, the detrimental impact of maternal controlling behavior on adolescent EF becomes pronounced. No similar effect emerged for fathers, suggesting that these processes may be specific to the mother-adolescent relationship. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).

家庭混乱、父母拒绝和父母控制对青少年执行功能的影响。
本研究考察了家庭混乱、父母控制和父母拒绝/接受(即温暖)在预测青少年执行功能(EF)技能方面的相互作用。为了了解家庭混乱、父母控制和父母拒绝/接受对青少年EF的直接和互动影响,我们在一项短期纵向研究设计中测试了一种三向交互作用。参与者是14- 15岁的孩子和他们的父母(n = 220对母亲-青少年,n = 139对父亲-青少年,48%的女性),他们来自大约相同数量的非裔美国人(34%)、西班牙裔美国人(36%)和欧洲裔美国人(29%)的美国家庭。母亲、父亲和青少年完成访谈和问卷,青少年完成EF认知控制任务。较低水平的家庭混乱可以预测青少年良好的英语学习,但没有观察到青少年控制感或拒绝感对青少年英语学习的主要影响。对于母亲来说,控制行为、拒绝和家庭混乱之间只存在三向交互作用:在对青少年表现出更高程度的拒绝(即低温暖)的母亲中,控制行为和青少年EF之间的负相关在更混乱的家庭中是显著的。相比之下,在不那么混乱的家庭中,无论母亲的排斥程度如何,母亲的控制行为与青少年EF之间没有关联。当母亲排斥和家庭混乱等多重风险因素并存时,母亲控制行为对青少年EF的不利影响更为明显。父亲没有出现类似的影响,这表明这些过程可能只针对母亲与青少年的关系。(PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA,版权所有)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Developmental Psychology
Developmental Psychology PSYCHOLOGY, DEVELOPMENTAL-
CiteScore
5.80
自引率
2.50%
发文量
329
期刊介绍: Developmental Psychology ® publishes articles that significantly advance knowledge and theory about development across the life span. The journal focuses on seminal empirical contributions. The journal occasionally publishes exceptionally strong scholarly reviews and theoretical or methodological articles. Studies of any aspect of psychological development are appropriate, as are studies of the biological, social, and cultural factors that affect development. The journal welcomes not only laboratory-based experimental studies but studies employing other rigorous methodologies, such as ethnographies, field research, and secondary analyses of large data sets. We especially seek submissions in new areas of inquiry and submissions that will address contradictory findings or controversies in the field as well as the generalizability of extant findings in new populations. Although most articles in this journal address human development, studies of other species are appropriate if they have important implications for human development. Submissions can consist of single manuscripts, proposed sections, or short reports.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信