Church Committee Engagement in and Evaluation of an Online Faith-Based Training in a National Implementation Study.

IF 1.2 Q3 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Sara Wilcox, Ruth P Saunders, Jasmin Parker-Brown, Andrew T Kaczynski, Jessica Stucker, Deborah Kinnard, Kelsey R Day, Caroline Rudisill
{"title":"Church Committee Engagement in and Evaluation of an Online Faith-Based Training in a National Implementation Study.","authors":"Sara Wilcox, Ruth P Saunders, Jasmin Parker-Brown, Andrew T Kaczynski, Jessica Stucker, Deborah Kinnard, Kelsey R Day, Caroline Rudisill","doi":"10.1177/15248399251362162","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Training is a commonly used implementation strategy to prepare organizational change agents in a variety of settings. Online training has the potential for more efficient and cost-effective scale-up of evidence-based interventions, but in-depth analysis of training engagement, especially in settings such as churches, is lacking. This study reported engagement with and evaluation of an online training for churches in the national implementation study of Faith, Activity, and Nutrition (FAN), an evidence-based program that targets church practices. Churches (N = 107) from 23 U.S. states (74.8% predominantly African American) and 442 committee members enrolled. Church committees, led by FAN coordinators, registered for the eight-lesson online training. Regarding training engagement, committee members completed 4.8±3.7 of eight lessons, and most who started the training finished it. They posted 1.8±3.0 times on the discussion board. Lesson completion and discussion board posts were higher among FAN coordinators and women and those older and not employed (p <.05). Just below half (42%) of churches submitted a FAN program plan, with submission more likely when the FAN coordinator completed the training or when the pastor completed at least one lesson (p <.05). Furthermore, quantitative and qualitative data showed favorable evaluations of the online training. The absence of differences in training engagement by education and race and the more favorable associations with increased age are highly promising indicators that this training can be scaled up to reach diverse learners. FAN coordinators, however, may need strategies to engage other committee members to initiate training.</p>","PeriodicalId":47956,"journal":{"name":"Health Promotion Practice","volume":" ","pages":"15248399251362162"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health Promotion Practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/15248399251362162","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Training is a commonly used implementation strategy to prepare organizational change agents in a variety of settings. Online training has the potential for more efficient and cost-effective scale-up of evidence-based interventions, but in-depth analysis of training engagement, especially in settings such as churches, is lacking. This study reported engagement with and evaluation of an online training for churches in the national implementation study of Faith, Activity, and Nutrition (FAN), an evidence-based program that targets church practices. Churches (N = 107) from 23 U.S. states (74.8% predominantly African American) and 442 committee members enrolled. Church committees, led by FAN coordinators, registered for the eight-lesson online training. Regarding training engagement, committee members completed 4.8±3.7 of eight lessons, and most who started the training finished it. They posted 1.8±3.0 times on the discussion board. Lesson completion and discussion board posts were higher among FAN coordinators and women and those older and not employed (p <.05). Just below half (42%) of churches submitted a FAN program plan, with submission more likely when the FAN coordinator completed the training or when the pastor completed at least one lesson (p <.05). Furthermore, quantitative and qualitative data showed favorable evaluations of the online training. The absence of differences in training engagement by education and race and the more favorable associations with increased age are highly promising indicators that this training can be scaled up to reach diverse learners. FAN coordinators, however, may need strategies to engage other committee members to initiate training.

教会委员会参与和评估在线信仰培训在全国实施研究。
培训是一种常用的实施策略,用于在各种环境中为组织变革推动者做好准备。在线培训有可能提高循证干预措施的效率和成本效益,但缺乏对培训参与情况的深入分析,特别是在教堂等环境中。本研究报告了在信仰、活动和营养(FAN)的国家实施研究中对教会在线培训的参与和评估,这是一个以教会实践为目标的循证项目。来自美国23个州的教会(N = 107)(主要是非裔美国人占74.8%)和442名委员会成员参加。由FAN协调员领导的教会委员会报名参加了八课的在线培训。在培训参与度方面,委员们完成了8节课中的4.8±3.7节,大多数开始培训的委员完成了培训。他们在讨论板上发表了1.8±3.0次。课堂完成率和讨论板发帖率在FAN协调员、女性以及年龄较大和未就业的人中较高
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Health Promotion Practice
Health Promotion Practice PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH-
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
5.30%
发文量
126
期刊介绍: Health Promotion Practice (HPP) publishes authoritative articles devoted to the practical application of health promotion and education. It publishes information of strategic importance to a broad base of professionals engaged in the practice of developing, implementing, and evaluating health promotion and disease prevention programs. The journal"s editorial board is committed to focusing on the applications of health promotion and public health education interventions, programs and best practice strategies in various settings, including but not limited to, community, health care, worksite, educational, and international settings. Additionally, the journal focuses on the development and application of public policy conducive to the promotion of health and prevention of disease.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信