Influence of age on the efficacy of immunochemotherapy in non-small cell lung cancer.

IF 1.3 Q4 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY
Alicia Aguado-Paredes, Laura Moñino-Dominguez, Jaime Cordero-Ramos, Emilio Alegre-Del-Rey
{"title":"Influence of age on the efficacy of immunochemotherapy in non-small cell lung cancer.","authors":"Alicia Aguado-Paredes, Laura Moñino-Dominguez, Jaime Cordero-Ramos, Emilio Alegre-Del-Rey","doi":"10.1016/j.farma.2025.06.001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>There is uncertainty about how age affects the efficacy of immunotherapy due to the natural process of immunosenescence. The aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis is to assess whether age over 65 years affects the efficacy, in terms of overall survival, of immunotherapy treatments in combination with chemotherapy or double immunotherapy, used in first-line metastatic non-small cell lung cancer without molecular alterations.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A systematic review and meta-analysis were performed. A systematic search of PubMed and Cochrane Library until April 30, 2024 was conducted to identify randomized clinical trials comparing an experimental treatment with immune checkpoint inhibitors plus chemotherapy versus a platinum-based chemotherapy doublet in patients with locally advanced or metastatic non-small cell lung cancer, without molecular mutations and with any level of programmed death ligand 1 expression. The primary endpoint was the difference in efficacy between those older and younger than 65 years, measured in terms of difference in overall survival hazard ratio. We calculated the hazard ratio for overall survival with its 95% confidence interval in both age groups and assessed heterogeneity using an interaction test.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 1,505 publications were identified, of which 7 clinical trials were included. In addition, the European public report evaluating pembrolizumab in combination with platinum and nab-paclitaxel was incorporated. In total, the analysis included 5,572 patients: 2,893 under 65 years of age and 2,679 aged 65 years or older. The pooled Hazard Ratio for overall survival for patients in the first group was 0.68 (95% CI: 0.62-0.74), and for the second 0.77 (95% CI: 0.70-0.84). The p-interaction between the pooled Hazard Ratio of both groups was 0.0551.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Both those younger and older than 65 years benefit from immunotherapy combined with chemotherapy in the treatment of non-small cell lung cancer. Although there appears to be greater efficacy in those younger than 65 years, the influence of age is not entirely clear.</p>","PeriodicalId":45860,"journal":{"name":"FARMACIA HOSPITALARIA","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"FARMACIA HOSPITALARIA","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.farma.2025.06.001","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: There is uncertainty about how age affects the efficacy of immunotherapy due to the natural process of immunosenescence. The aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis is to assess whether age over 65 years affects the efficacy, in terms of overall survival, of immunotherapy treatments in combination with chemotherapy or double immunotherapy, used in first-line metastatic non-small cell lung cancer without molecular alterations.

Methods: A systematic review and meta-analysis were performed. A systematic search of PubMed and Cochrane Library until April 30, 2024 was conducted to identify randomized clinical trials comparing an experimental treatment with immune checkpoint inhibitors plus chemotherapy versus a platinum-based chemotherapy doublet in patients with locally advanced or metastatic non-small cell lung cancer, without molecular mutations and with any level of programmed death ligand 1 expression. The primary endpoint was the difference in efficacy between those older and younger than 65 years, measured in terms of difference in overall survival hazard ratio. We calculated the hazard ratio for overall survival with its 95% confidence interval in both age groups and assessed heterogeneity using an interaction test.

Results: A total of 1,505 publications were identified, of which 7 clinical trials were included. In addition, the European public report evaluating pembrolizumab in combination with platinum and nab-paclitaxel was incorporated. In total, the analysis included 5,572 patients: 2,893 under 65 years of age and 2,679 aged 65 years or older. The pooled Hazard Ratio for overall survival for patients in the first group was 0.68 (95% CI: 0.62-0.74), and for the second 0.77 (95% CI: 0.70-0.84). The p-interaction between the pooled Hazard Ratio of both groups was 0.0551.

Conclusions: Both those younger and older than 65 years benefit from immunotherapy combined with chemotherapy in the treatment of non-small cell lung cancer. Although there appears to be greater efficacy in those younger than 65 years, the influence of age is not entirely clear.

年龄对非小细胞肺癌免疫化疗疗效的影响。
目的:由于免疫衰老的自然过程,年龄对免疫治疗效果的影响尚不确定。本系统综述和荟萃分析的目的是评估年龄超过65 岁是否会影响免疫疗法联合化疗或双重免疫疗法治疗无分子改变的一线转移性非小细胞肺癌的疗效。方法:进行系统综述和荟萃分析。对PubMed和Cochrane Library进行了系统检索,直到2024年4月30日,以确定随机临床试验,比较免疫检查点抑制剂加化疗与基于铂的化疗双药对局部晚期或转移性非小细胞肺癌患者的实验性治疗,无分子突变和任何水平的程序性死亡配体1表达。主要终点是65岁以下和65岁以下患者的疗效差异,以总生存风险比的差异来衡量。我们计算了两个年龄组总生存率的风险比及其95%置信区间,并使用相互作用检验评估异质性。结果:共纳入文献1505篇,其中纳入7项临床试验。此外,欧洲评估pembrolizumab与铂和nab-紫杉醇联合使用的公开报告也被纳入。该分析共包括5572例患者:2893例年龄在65岁 以下,2679例年龄在65岁 以上。第一组患者总生存率的合并风险比为0.68 (95% CI: 0.62-0.74),第二组患者的合并风险比为0.77 (95% CI: 0.70-0.84)。两组合并风险比的p交互作用为0.0551。结论:在非小细胞肺癌的治疗中,年龄小于65岁 的患者和年龄小于65岁的患者都能从免疫疗法联合化疗中获益。虽然在年龄小于65岁 的人群中似乎更有效,但年龄的影响并不完全清楚。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
FARMACIA HOSPITALARIA
FARMACIA HOSPITALARIA PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY-
CiteScore
1.90
自引率
21.40%
发文量
46
审稿时长
37 days
期刊介绍: Una gran revista para acceder a los mejores artículos originales y revisiones de la farmacoterapia actual. Además, es Órgano de expresión científica de la Sociedad Española de Farmacia Hospitalaria, y está indexada en Index Medicus/Medline, EMBASE/Excerpta Médica, Alert, Internacional Pharmaceutical Abstracts y SCOPUS.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信