Postgraduate doctors in training's limited knowledge and practice in the assessment and management of inpatients with diabetes and frailty may contribute to suboptimal outcomes.
Hnin Lwin, Anu Thomas, Mohamed Fazil, Kevin Thottungal, Garima Gupta, Kashish Gera, Ali Kareem, Sadaf Saeed, Meri Davitadze, Eka Melson, Alison Gallagher, Kath Higgins
{"title":"Postgraduate doctors in training's limited knowledge and practice in the assessment and management of inpatients with diabetes and frailty may contribute to suboptimal outcomes.","authors":"Hnin Lwin, Anu Thomas, Mohamed Fazil, Kevin Thottungal, Garima Gupta, Kashish Gera, Ali Kareem, Sadaf Saeed, Meri Davitadze, Eka Melson, Alison Gallagher, Kath Higgins","doi":"10.1177/14782715251362057","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>People with diabetes and frailty require less intensive treatment of hyperglycaemia. Previous study has shown low rates of HbA<sub>1c</sub> assessment and deintensification for people with diabetes and frailty. Postgraduate doctors in training (PGDiT) is important in the inpatient management of people with diabetes and frailty. This study aims to assess the knowledge and management practice amongst PGDiT in managing people with diabetes and frailty and how this may translate to patients' clinical outcomes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Three cross-sectional survey-based studies were conducted on PGDiT at the beginning of each 4-month rotation. Survey questions incorporated knowledge of HbA<sub>1c</sub> goals and on PGDiT deintensification practice in people with diabetes and frailty who are overtreated with blood glucose-lowering medication. These were coupled by two cross-sectional data collection on patients' outcomes conducted during the same period including HbA<sub>1c</sub> assessment and rates of deintensification.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>PGDiT survey: 160 PGDiT responded to the survey. 80.0% (<i>n</i> = 128/160) of PGDiT reported that they knew the target HbA<sub>1c</sub> in patients with diabetes and frailty. However, only 32.8% (<i>n</i> = 42/128) of these correctly indicated the target HbA<sub>1c</sub> for such patients. PGDiT deintensification practices were lower than expected and several barriers of inpatient deintensification were identified. Patients' clinical outcomes: 198 patients with diabetes and moderate-severe frailty were included in our analysis (median (interquartile range, IQR) age 80 (71-87) years with median (IQR) clinical frailty scale of 6 (6-7)). For patients who did not have their HbA<sub>1c</sub> assessed in the last 6 months preceding admission, only 18.1% (<i>n</i> = 13/72) had it assessed during admission. In patients who are overtreated, deintensification rate was 29.7% (<i>n</i> = 22/74).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our audit shows limited knowledge and management practices amongst PGDiT in the management of inpatients with diabetes and frailty that may contribute to low inpatient deintensification rate. Interventions are needed to improve patient outcomes and a model of care consisting of appropriate inpatient multidisciplinary team input to reduce treatment inertia.</p>","PeriodicalId":46606,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the Royal College of Physicians of Edinburgh","volume":" ","pages":"174-183"},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the Royal College of Physicians of Edinburgh","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/14782715251362057","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/8/8 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Introduction: People with diabetes and frailty require less intensive treatment of hyperglycaemia. Previous study has shown low rates of HbA1c assessment and deintensification for people with diabetes and frailty. Postgraduate doctors in training (PGDiT) is important in the inpatient management of people with diabetes and frailty. This study aims to assess the knowledge and management practice amongst PGDiT in managing people with diabetes and frailty and how this may translate to patients' clinical outcomes.
Methods: Three cross-sectional survey-based studies were conducted on PGDiT at the beginning of each 4-month rotation. Survey questions incorporated knowledge of HbA1c goals and on PGDiT deintensification practice in people with diabetes and frailty who are overtreated with blood glucose-lowering medication. These were coupled by two cross-sectional data collection on patients' outcomes conducted during the same period including HbA1c assessment and rates of deintensification.
Results: PGDiT survey: 160 PGDiT responded to the survey. 80.0% (n = 128/160) of PGDiT reported that they knew the target HbA1c in patients with diabetes and frailty. However, only 32.8% (n = 42/128) of these correctly indicated the target HbA1c for such patients. PGDiT deintensification practices were lower than expected and several barriers of inpatient deintensification were identified. Patients' clinical outcomes: 198 patients with diabetes and moderate-severe frailty were included in our analysis (median (interquartile range, IQR) age 80 (71-87) years with median (IQR) clinical frailty scale of 6 (6-7)). For patients who did not have their HbA1c assessed in the last 6 months preceding admission, only 18.1% (n = 13/72) had it assessed during admission. In patients who are overtreated, deintensification rate was 29.7% (n = 22/74).
Conclusion: Our audit shows limited knowledge and management practices amongst PGDiT in the management of inpatients with diabetes and frailty that may contribute to low inpatient deintensification rate. Interventions are needed to improve patient outcomes and a model of care consisting of appropriate inpatient multidisciplinary team input to reduce treatment inertia.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of the Royal College of Physicians of Edinburgh (JRCPE) is the College’s quarterly, peer-reviewed journal, with an international circulation of 8,000. It has three main emphases – clinical medicine, education and medical history. The online JRCPE provides full access to the contents of the print journal and has a number of additional features including advance online publication of recently accepted papers, an online archive, online-only papers, online symposia abstracts, and a series of topic-specific supplements, primarily based on the College’s consensus conferences.