Advanced machine learning models for prediction of readmission and mortality risks in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease using routine clinical data.

Fujita Medical Journal Pub Date : 2025-08-01 Epub Date: 2025-04-17 DOI:10.20407/fmj.2024-027
Yasuhiro Goto, Daisuke Niwa, Shuhei Shibata, Ryoma Nishimoto, Masami Miyata, Takashi Kanno, Toshiyuki Washizawa, Masashi Kondo, Kazuyoshi Imaizumi
{"title":"Advanced machine learning models for prediction of readmission and mortality risks in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease using routine clinical data.","authors":"Yasuhiro Goto, Daisuke Niwa, Shuhei Shibata, Ryoma Nishimoto, Masami Miyata, Takashi Kanno, Toshiyuki Washizawa, Masashi Kondo, Kazuyoshi Imaizumi","doi":"10.20407/fmj.2024-027","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To develop a comprehensive machine learning model incorporating various clinical factors, including frailty and comorbidities, to predict 30-day readmission and mortality risk in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective cohort study used electronic health records (EHR) from Fujita Health University Hospital (2004-2019) for 1294 patients with COPD and 3499 hospitalization or death events. The EHR contained longitudinal patient data (demographics, diagnoses, test results, clinical records). We developed two eXtreme Gradient Boosting models, the comprehensive Top64 and practical 11-feature models. We compared these with the Comorbidity, Obstruction, Dyspnea, and Previous Exacerbations index (CODEX) model, a widely used tool for predicting hospital readmission or death in patients with COPD. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) with 95% confidence interval (CI), sensitivity, and specificity were used to evaluate the model performance.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The Top64 (AUC: 0.769, 95% CI: 0.747-0.791) and practical 11-feature (AUC: 0.746, 95% CI: 0.730-0.762) models performed better than the CODEX model (AUC: 0.587, 95% CI: 0.563-0.611). The Top64 model showed 0.978 sensitivity and 0.341 specificity, and the practical 11-feature model achieved 0.955 sensitivity and 0.361 specificity. The calibration curves showed good agreement between the observed and predicted results for both models.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>A machine learning approach based on clinical data readily available from the EHR performed better than existing models in predicting 30-day readmission and mortality risks in patients with COPD. A comprehensive risk prediction tool may enhance individualized care strategies and improve patient outcomes in COPD management.</p>","PeriodicalId":33657,"journal":{"name":"Fujita Medical Journal","volume":"11 3","pages":"121-128"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12327213/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Fujita Medical Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.20407/fmj.2024-027","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/4/17 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: To develop a comprehensive machine learning model incorporating various clinical factors, including frailty and comorbidities, to predict 30-day readmission and mortality risk in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD).

Methods: This retrospective cohort study used electronic health records (EHR) from Fujita Health University Hospital (2004-2019) for 1294 patients with COPD and 3499 hospitalization or death events. The EHR contained longitudinal patient data (demographics, diagnoses, test results, clinical records). We developed two eXtreme Gradient Boosting models, the comprehensive Top64 and practical 11-feature models. We compared these with the Comorbidity, Obstruction, Dyspnea, and Previous Exacerbations index (CODEX) model, a widely used tool for predicting hospital readmission or death in patients with COPD. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) with 95% confidence interval (CI), sensitivity, and specificity were used to evaluate the model performance.

Results: The Top64 (AUC: 0.769, 95% CI: 0.747-0.791) and practical 11-feature (AUC: 0.746, 95% CI: 0.730-0.762) models performed better than the CODEX model (AUC: 0.587, 95% CI: 0.563-0.611). The Top64 model showed 0.978 sensitivity and 0.341 specificity, and the practical 11-feature model achieved 0.955 sensitivity and 0.361 specificity. The calibration curves showed good agreement between the observed and predicted results for both models.

Conclusions: A machine learning approach based on clinical data readily available from the EHR performed better than existing models in predicting 30-day readmission and mortality risks in patients with COPD. A comprehensive risk prediction tool may enhance individualized care strategies and improve patient outcomes in COPD management.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

利用常规临床数据预测慢性阻塞性肺疾病患者再入院和死亡风险的先进机器学习模型。
目的:开发一个综合各种临床因素的综合机器学习模型,包括虚弱和合并症,以预测慢性阻塞性肺疾病(COPD)患者30天的再入院和死亡风险。方法:本回顾性队列研究使用藤田保健大学医院(2004-2019)的电子健康记录(EHR),记录了1294例COPD患者和3499例住院或死亡事件。电子病历包含纵向患者数据(人口统计、诊断、检测结果、临床记录)。我们开发了两个极端梯度增强模型,即综合Top64模型和实用的11特征模型。我们将这些与合并症、梗阻、呼吸困难和既往加重指数(CODEX)模型进行了比较,CODEX模型是一种广泛使用的预测COPD患者再入院或死亡的工具。采用95%置信区间(CI)的受试者工作特征曲线下面积(AUC)、敏感性和特异性来评价模型的性能。结果:Top64模型(AUC: 0.769, 95% CI: 0.747 ~ 0.791)和实用11-feature模型(AUC: 0.746, 95% CI: 0.730 ~ 0.762)均优于CODEX模型(AUC: 0.587, 95% CI: 0.563 ~ 0.611)。Top64模型的灵敏度为0.978,特异度为0.341,实用11特征模型的灵敏度为0.955,特异度为0.361。校正曲线显示两种模型的观测结果与预测结果吻合较好。结论:基于EHR现成临床数据的机器学习方法在预测COPD患者30天再入院和死亡风险方面优于现有模型。综合风险预测工具可提高COPD患者的个体化治疗策略,改善COPD患者的预后。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
13 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书