Prediction of success of slings in female stress incontinence, statistical and AI modeling.

IF 3.9 2区 综合性期刊 Q1 MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES
Bassem S Wadie, Ahmed Abdelrasheed, Mohammed Taha, Ahmed Abdelrahman, Bassam Mohamed, Alaa Saber, Ahmed Badawi
{"title":"Prediction of success of slings in female stress incontinence, statistical and AI modeling.","authors":"Bassem S Wadie, Ahmed Abdelrasheed, Mohammed Taha, Ahmed Abdelrahman, Bassam Mohamed, Alaa Saber, Ahmed Badawi","doi":"10.1038/s41598-025-12826-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Studies on predicting the outcome of sling surgery are limited. Most depend on analysis of multiple confounding factors using regression models. However, their prediction results are limited. In this study, we tested a statistical regression model and an AI model for the prediction of the outcome of mid-urethral sling. Data were collected from 151 patients who underwent MUS surgery in our center from 2002 to 2022 and confounding factors that affect the outcome of the surgery at a minimum of one year. The study was divided into two phases. Phase I included the construction of a prediction model using binomial logistic regression. In phase II, we applied AI techniques (Artificial neural network (ANN) and Support Vector Machines (SVM) trying to obtain better predictions. Phase I: The logistic regression model predicted the outcome of surgery with overall accuracy of 90.7% and positive predictive value of 61.5% [X<sup>2</sup> (11) = 46.24, P < 0.001]. Phase II: The data of the patients were entered as 10 features; 9 were predictors and the 10<sup>th</sup> was the output. The output comprised 18 cases designated as 'failure' and 133 as 'success' output. The best model performance-wise was the (SVM) with 92% accuracy and 96% F1-score, which meets the industrial standards for predictive models. However, ANN produced 90% accuracy and 94% F1-score. However, our sample size is small. Prediction of the outcome of MUS surgery was achieved using different modalities with the best prediction of the outcome obtained by SVM method. This is helpful in future counseling of women undergoing sling surgery, whatever its type as to what to expect after surgery.</p>","PeriodicalId":21811,"journal":{"name":"Scientific Reports","volume":"15 1","pages":"28948"},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12332121/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Scientific Reports","FirstCategoryId":"103","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-12826-6","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"综合性期刊","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Studies on predicting the outcome of sling surgery are limited. Most depend on analysis of multiple confounding factors using regression models. However, their prediction results are limited. In this study, we tested a statistical regression model and an AI model for the prediction of the outcome of mid-urethral sling. Data were collected from 151 patients who underwent MUS surgery in our center from 2002 to 2022 and confounding factors that affect the outcome of the surgery at a minimum of one year. The study was divided into two phases. Phase I included the construction of a prediction model using binomial logistic regression. In phase II, we applied AI techniques (Artificial neural network (ANN) and Support Vector Machines (SVM) trying to obtain better predictions. Phase I: The logistic regression model predicted the outcome of surgery with overall accuracy of 90.7% and positive predictive value of 61.5% [X2 (11) = 46.24, P < 0.001]. Phase II: The data of the patients were entered as 10 features; 9 were predictors and the 10th was the output. The output comprised 18 cases designated as 'failure' and 133 as 'success' output. The best model performance-wise was the (SVM) with 92% accuracy and 96% F1-score, which meets the industrial standards for predictive models. However, ANN produced 90% accuracy and 94% F1-score. However, our sample size is small. Prediction of the outcome of MUS surgery was achieved using different modalities with the best prediction of the outcome obtained by SVM method. This is helpful in future counseling of women undergoing sling surgery, whatever its type as to what to expect after surgery.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

预测女性压力性尿失禁的吊带成功,统计和人工智能模型。
预测吊带手术结果的研究是有限的。大多数依赖于使用回归模型对多个混杂因素进行分析。然而,他们的预测结果有限。在本研究中,我们测试了统计回归模型和人工智能模型来预测尿道中悬吊的结果。我们收集了2002年至2022年在我中心接受MUS手术的151例患者的数据,以及至少一年影响手术结果的混杂因素。研究分为两个阶段。第一阶段是使用二项逻辑回归构建预测模型。在第二阶段,我们应用人工智能技术(人工神经网络(ANN)和支持向量机(SVM))试图获得更好的预测。第一阶段:logistic回归模型预测手术预后,总体准确率为90.7%,阳性预测值为61.5% [X2 (11) = 46.24, P =输出。输出包括18个被指定为“失败”的案例和133个被指定为“成功”的案例。最佳的模型性能是(SVM),准确率为92%,f1得分为96%,符合预测模型的行业标准。然而,人工神经网络产生了90%的准确率和94%的f1得分。然而,我们的样本量很小。采用不同的方法对MUS手术结果进行预测,其中SVM方法预测效果最好。这对将来接受吊带手术的妇女的咨询是有帮助的,无论其类型是什么,手术后的预期。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Scientific Reports
Scientific Reports Natural Science Disciplines-
CiteScore
7.50
自引率
4.30%
发文量
19567
审稿时长
3.9 months
期刊介绍: We publish original research from all areas of the natural sciences, psychology, medicine and engineering. You can learn more about what we publish by browsing our specific scientific subject areas below or explore Scientific Reports by browsing all articles and collections. Scientific Reports has a 2-year impact factor: 4.380 (2021), and is the 6th most-cited journal in the world, with more than 540,000 citations in 2020 (Clarivate Analytics, 2021). •Engineering Engineering covers all aspects of engineering, technology, and applied science. It plays a crucial role in the development of technologies to address some of the world''s biggest challenges, helping to save lives and improve the way we live. •Physical sciences Physical sciences are those academic disciplines that aim to uncover the underlying laws of nature — often written in the language of mathematics. It is a collective term for areas of study including astronomy, chemistry, materials science and physics. •Earth and environmental sciences Earth and environmental sciences cover all aspects of Earth and planetary science and broadly encompass solid Earth processes, surface and atmospheric dynamics, Earth system history, climate and climate change, marine and freshwater systems, and ecology. It also considers the interactions between humans and these systems. •Biological sciences Biological sciences encompass all the divisions of natural sciences examining various aspects of vital processes. The concept includes anatomy, physiology, cell biology, biochemistry and biophysics, and covers all organisms from microorganisms, animals to plants. •Health sciences The health sciences study health, disease and healthcare. This field of study aims to develop knowledge, interventions and technology for use in healthcare to improve the treatment of patients.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信