{"title":"Social Exclusion and Emotional Experience: The Impact of Mentalized Affectivity.","authors":"Anna Voicu, Andrew Luchner","doi":"10.1177/00332941251358211","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Social exclusion has been widely associated with feelings of anxiety, depressed mood, anger, and hostility. While a number of individual difference variables have been found to moderate the emotional effects of exclusion, no known research has been conducted on the impact of mentalized affectivity. Previous literature indicates that mentalized affectivity (MA), a sophisticated form of emotional regulation, may be effective in mitigating emotional experience post-exclusion. In light of this research, our study sought to examine the predictive value of MA and inclusion/exclusion on emotion. Participants (<i>N</i> = 170) completed measures of mentalized affectivity and positive and negative affect, in addition to playing a virtual ball-tossing game that would randomly assign them to an inclusion or exclusion condition. Multiple regression analyses revealed that mentalized affectivity predicted both positive and negative affect, although the manipulation was only successful in predicting positive emotion. When looking more specifically at the individual components of mentalized affectivity, only processing ability was significant when assessed for positive affect, while both processing and expressing were significant in terms of negative affect. Our study highlights the importance of mentalized affectivity in promoting healthy psychological functioning, as opposed to merely decreasing psychopathology and negative emotion.</p>","PeriodicalId":21149,"journal":{"name":"Psychological Reports","volume":" ","pages":"332941251358211"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psychological Reports","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/00332941251358211","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Social exclusion has been widely associated with feelings of anxiety, depressed mood, anger, and hostility. While a number of individual difference variables have been found to moderate the emotional effects of exclusion, no known research has been conducted on the impact of mentalized affectivity. Previous literature indicates that mentalized affectivity (MA), a sophisticated form of emotional regulation, may be effective in mitigating emotional experience post-exclusion. In light of this research, our study sought to examine the predictive value of MA and inclusion/exclusion on emotion. Participants (N = 170) completed measures of mentalized affectivity and positive and negative affect, in addition to playing a virtual ball-tossing game that would randomly assign them to an inclusion or exclusion condition. Multiple regression analyses revealed that mentalized affectivity predicted both positive and negative affect, although the manipulation was only successful in predicting positive emotion. When looking more specifically at the individual components of mentalized affectivity, only processing ability was significant when assessed for positive affect, while both processing and expressing were significant in terms of negative affect. Our study highlights the importance of mentalized affectivity in promoting healthy psychological functioning, as opposed to merely decreasing psychopathology and negative emotion.