Effect of Antifungal Therapy on the Postoperative Period in Non-Invasive Fungal Sinusitis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

IF 3.1 2区 医学 Q1 DERMATOLOGY
Mycoses Pub Date : 2025-08-01 DOI:10.1111/myc.70100
Xi Zhang, Ling Yang, Qicheng Deng, Min Yan
{"title":"Effect of Antifungal Therapy on the Postoperative Period in Non-Invasive Fungal Sinusitis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.","authors":"Xi Zhang, Ling Yang, Qicheng Deng, Min Yan","doi":"10.1111/myc.70100","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Surgery is the primary treatment method for non-invasive fungal sinusitis, but challenges include prolonged postoperative inflammation recovery and high recurrence rates. Existing evidence regarding the role of antifungal therapy in enhancing postoperative recovery and reducing recurrence rates in non-invasive fungal sinusitis remains inconclusive. This meta-analysis aimed to systematically evaluate the impact of antifungal therapy on postoperative outcomes in non-invasive fungal sinusitis.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>An eight-database systematic search was performed through March 1, 2025. Primary outcomes included relapse rate and total effective rate, with secondary outcomes consisting of adverse reaction incidence and average epithelialisation time. Subgroup analysis based on antifungal administration routes was also performed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The antifungal therapy group had significantly lower relapse rates (Odds Ratio [OR] = 0.27, 95% Confidence Interval [CI]: 0.18-0.40, p < 0.00001) and higher total effective rates (OR = 5.41, 95% CI: 3.17-9.23, p < 0.00001) compared to controls. Subgroup analysis showed that topical antifungal therapy (OR = 0.20, 95% CI: 0.12-0.32, p < 0.00001) had a more significant difference in relapse rates than systemic antifungal therapy (OR = 0.54, 95% CI: 0.27-1.05, p = 0.07).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Antifungal therapy after surgery for non-invasive fungal sinusitis, particularly topical antifungal therapy, is beneficial. However, the evidence is limited by the low quality of available studies. Future studies with larger sample sizes, multicentre designs and double-blind randomised controlled trials (RCTs) are necessary to validate these conclusions.</p>","PeriodicalId":18797,"journal":{"name":"Mycoses","volume":"68 8","pages":"e70100"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Mycoses","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/myc.70100","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"DERMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Surgery is the primary treatment method for non-invasive fungal sinusitis, but challenges include prolonged postoperative inflammation recovery and high recurrence rates. Existing evidence regarding the role of antifungal therapy in enhancing postoperative recovery and reducing recurrence rates in non-invasive fungal sinusitis remains inconclusive. This meta-analysis aimed to systematically evaluate the impact of antifungal therapy on postoperative outcomes in non-invasive fungal sinusitis.

Methods: An eight-database systematic search was performed through March 1, 2025. Primary outcomes included relapse rate and total effective rate, with secondary outcomes consisting of adverse reaction incidence and average epithelialisation time. Subgroup analysis based on antifungal administration routes was also performed.

Results: The antifungal therapy group had significantly lower relapse rates (Odds Ratio [OR] = 0.27, 95% Confidence Interval [CI]: 0.18-0.40, p < 0.00001) and higher total effective rates (OR = 5.41, 95% CI: 3.17-9.23, p < 0.00001) compared to controls. Subgroup analysis showed that topical antifungal therapy (OR = 0.20, 95% CI: 0.12-0.32, p < 0.00001) had a more significant difference in relapse rates than systemic antifungal therapy (OR = 0.54, 95% CI: 0.27-1.05, p = 0.07).

Conclusions: Antifungal therapy after surgery for non-invasive fungal sinusitis, particularly topical antifungal therapy, is beneficial. However, the evidence is limited by the low quality of available studies. Future studies with larger sample sizes, multicentre designs and double-blind randomised controlled trials (RCTs) are necessary to validate these conclusions.

抗真菌治疗对非侵袭性真菌性鼻窦炎术后的影响:一项系统综述和荟萃分析。
背景:手术是治疗非侵袭性真菌性鼻窦炎的主要方法,但术后炎症恢复时间长、复发率高等挑战。关于抗真菌治疗在提高非侵袭性真菌性鼻窦炎术后恢复和降低复发率方面的作用,现有证据仍不确定。本荟萃分析旨在系统评估抗真菌治疗对非侵袭性真菌鼻窦炎术后预后的影响。方法:截至2025年3月1日,对8个数据库进行系统检索。主要结局包括复发率和总有效率,次要结局包括不良反应发生率和平均上皮化时间。根据给药途径进行亚组分析。结果:抗真菌治疗组复发率明显降低(优势比[OR] = 0.27, 95%可信区间[CI]: 0.18-0.40, p)结论:非侵袭性真菌性鼻窦炎术后抗真菌治疗,特别是局部抗真菌治疗是有益的。然而,证据受到现有研究质量低的限制。未来有必要进行更大样本量、多中心设计和双盲随机对照试验(rct)的研究来验证这些结论。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Mycoses
Mycoses 医学-皮肤病学
CiteScore
10.00
自引率
8.20%
发文量
143
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The journal Mycoses provides an international forum for original papers in English on the pathogenesis, diagnosis, therapy, prophylaxis, and epidemiology of fungal infectious diseases in humans as well as on the biology of pathogenic fungi. Medical mycology as part of medical microbiology is advancing rapidly. Effective therapeutic strategies are already available in chemotherapy and are being further developed. Their application requires reliable laboratory diagnostic techniques, which, in turn, result from mycological basic research. Opportunistic mycoses vary greatly in their clinical and pathological symptoms, because the underlying disease of a patient at risk decisively determines their symptomatology and progress. The journal Mycoses is therefore of interest to scientists in fundamental mycological research, mycological laboratory diagnosticians and clinicians interested in fungal infections.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信