Arvin Haj-Mirzaian, Shadi A Esfahani, Umar Mahmood, Pedram Heidari
{"title":"CREBBP Mutation as a Culprit for Negative SSTR2 PET in Neuroendocrine Tumors.","authors":"Arvin Haj-Mirzaian, Shadi A Esfahani, Umar Mahmood, Pedram Heidari","doi":"10.1007/s11307-025-02040-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>This study aimed to elucidate the molecular and genetic factors contributing to negative <sup>68</sup>Ga-DOTATATE PET imaging in neuroendocrine tumors (NETs). By integrating whole exome sequencing (WES) and single-cell RNA sequencing (scRNA-seq), we sought to unravel the interplay between negative results of <sup>68</sup>Ga-DOTATATE PET and genetic mutations in NETs.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 18 patients with lung, ileal, or pancreatic NETs who underwent <sup>68</sup>Ga-DOTATATE and <sup>18</sup>F-FDG PET/CT scans as part of their initial diagnostic workup were retrospectively reviewed. WES analysis was conducted to investigate the genetic profile of circulating tumor cells of patients with negative <sup>68</sup>Ga-DOTATATE scans. Leveraging scRNA-seq and single-cell somatic variant calling analysis, we compared the mutation burden and genetic hallmarks of NET cells with high /positive SSTR2 expression to those with negative/low SSTR2 expression.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Our analysis identified an association between negative <sup>68</sup>Ga-DOTATATE scans and reduced survival rates, regardless of tumor grade. WES highlighted a predominance of missense mutations, including CREBBP mutation, particularly in patients with negative PET results (incidence of %67 vs. %0). We observed a deleterious mutation in the SSTR2, likely accounting for the observed negative PET scans (incidence of %33). Single-cell single nucleotide variant (SNV) analysis showed that the total unique mutation burden in cells with negative/low SSTR2 expression was significantly higher compared to cells with positive/high expression; and notably, the CREBBP mutation was observed in more than 50% of patients and approximately 35% of NET cells. These results indicate that the frequency of CREBBP mutations is nearly as high as other well-known NET mutations such as MEN1, PTEN, and RB1. Additionally, CREBBP mutations are significantly more frequent in tumors with negative/low SSTR2 expression.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study suggests that CREBBP mutations in NETs may potentially alter SSTR2 expression, indicating that patients with the mutated CREBBP genotype may not be suitable candidates for SSTR2-targeted PET imaging and radionuclide therapy.</p>","PeriodicalId":18760,"journal":{"name":"Molecular Imaging and Biology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Molecular Imaging and Biology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11307-025-02040-1","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Purpose: This study aimed to elucidate the molecular and genetic factors contributing to negative 68Ga-DOTATATE PET imaging in neuroendocrine tumors (NETs). By integrating whole exome sequencing (WES) and single-cell RNA sequencing (scRNA-seq), we sought to unravel the interplay between negative results of 68Ga-DOTATATE PET and genetic mutations in NETs.
Methods: A total of 18 patients with lung, ileal, or pancreatic NETs who underwent 68Ga-DOTATATE and 18F-FDG PET/CT scans as part of their initial diagnostic workup were retrospectively reviewed. WES analysis was conducted to investigate the genetic profile of circulating tumor cells of patients with negative 68Ga-DOTATATE scans. Leveraging scRNA-seq and single-cell somatic variant calling analysis, we compared the mutation burden and genetic hallmarks of NET cells with high /positive SSTR2 expression to those with negative/low SSTR2 expression.
Results: Our analysis identified an association between negative 68Ga-DOTATATE scans and reduced survival rates, regardless of tumor grade. WES highlighted a predominance of missense mutations, including CREBBP mutation, particularly in patients with negative PET results (incidence of %67 vs. %0). We observed a deleterious mutation in the SSTR2, likely accounting for the observed negative PET scans (incidence of %33). Single-cell single nucleotide variant (SNV) analysis showed that the total unique mutation burden in cells with negative/low SSTR2 expression was significantly higher compared to cells with positive/high expression; and notably, the CREBBP mutation was observed in more than 50% of patients and approximately 35% of NET cells. These results indicate that the frequency of CREBBP mutations is nearly as high as other well-known NET mutations such as MEN1, PTEN, and RB1. Additionally, CREBBP mutations are significantly more frequent in tumors with negative/low SSTR2 expression.
Conclusion: This study suggests that CREBBP mutations in NETs may potentially alter SSTR2 expression, indicating that patients with the mutated CREBBP genotype may not be suitable candidates for SSTR2-targeted PET imaging and radionuclide therapy.
期刊介绍:
Molecular Imaging and Biology (MIB) invites original contributions (research articles, review articles, commentaries, etc.) on the utilization of molecular imaging (i.e., nuclear imaging, optical imaging, autoradiography and pathology, MRI, MPI, ultrasound imaging, radiomics/genomics etc.) to investigate questions related to biology and health. The objective of MIB is to provide a forum to the discovery of molecular mechanisms of disease through the use of imaging techniques. We aim to investigate the biological nature of disease in patients and establish new molecular imaging diagnostic and therapy procedures.
Some areas that are covered are:
Preclinical and clinical imaging of macromolecular targets (e.g., genes, receptors, enzymes) involved in significant biological processes.
The design, characterization, and study of new molecular imaging probes and contrast agents for the functional interrogation of macromolecular targets.
Development and evaluation of imaging systems including instrumentation, image reconstruction algorithms, image analysis, and display.
Development of molecular assay approaches leading to quantification of the biological information obtained in molecular imaging.
Study of in vivo animal models of disease for the development of new molecular diagnostics and therapeutics.
Extension of in vitro and in vivo discoveries using disease models, into well designed clinical research investigations.
Clinical molecular imaging involving clinical investigations, clinical trials and medical management or cost-effectiveness studies.