Association between magnesium oxide use and readmission risk in patients with heart failure and constipation.

IF 1.2 Q4 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY
Junichi Terashima, Takahiro Kambara, Eisei Hori, Risako Koketsu, Teruhiro Sakaguchi, Hiroyuki Osanai, Tomoya Tachi, Tadashi Suzuki
{"title":"Association between magnesium oxide use and readmission risk in patients with heart failure and constipation.","authors":"Junichi Terashima, Takahiro Kambara, Eisei Hori, Risako Koketsu, Teruhiro Sakaguchi, Hiroyuki Osanai, Tomoya Tachi, Tadashi Suzuki","doi":"10.1186/s40780-025-00478-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Constipation is frequently observed in patients with chronic heart failure and has been linked to a heightened risk of adverse heart failure outcomes. Although laxatives are commonly prescribed, the optimal choice for individuals with heart failure remains uncertain. We evaluated the association between magnesium oxide use and heart failure prognosis in patients with chronic heart failure.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective observational study was conducted on patients admitted to our hospital for heart failure between January 2020 and December 2023 who were continued to be prescribed the same laxatives after discharge. Patients who received magnesium oxide for regular use were categorized into the magnesium oxide group, while all other patients comprised the nonmagnesium oxide group. The primary endpoints were heart failure-related readmission and all-cause mortality, while the secondary endpoint was a composite of both. Propensity scores were calculated based on baseline patient characteristics and used to perform 1:1 nearest-neighbor matching.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>During the study period, 171 outpatients with heart failure were prescribed laxatives after hospital discharge, with 74 patients included in the magnesium oxide group. Using propensity score matching, a cohort of 41 matched pairs was established. After matching, the analysis showed that the hazard ratio (HR) for first readmission within 360 d was 0.33 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.10-0.92, p = 0.035). Additionally, the combined risk of first readmission and all-cause mortality was associated with an HR of 0.30 (95% CI: 0.11-0.82, p = 0.019).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Magnesium oxide was strongly associated with a lower risk of readmission and/or death in patients with heart failure who were prescribed laxatives.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>N/A. Cases were registered retrospectively.</p>","PeriodicalId":16730,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Pharmaceutical Health Care and Sciences","volume":"11 1","pages":"68"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12333274/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Pharmaceutical Health Care and Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s40780-025-00478-7","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Constipation is frequently observed in patients with chronic heart failure and has been linked to a heightened risk of adverse heart failure outcomes. Although laxatives are commonly prescribed, the optimal choice for individuals with heart failure remains uncertain. We evaluated the association between magnesium oxide use and heart failure prognosis in patients with chronic heart failure.

Methods: A retrospective observational study was conducted on patients admitted to our hospital for heart failure between January 2020 and December 2023 who were continued to be prescribed the same laxatives after discharge. Patients who received magnesium oxide for regular use were categorized into the magnesium oxide group, while all other patients comprised the nonmagnesium oxide group. The primary endpoints were heart failure-related readmission and all-cause mortality, while the secondary endpoint was a composite of both. Propensity scores were calculated based on baseline patient characteristics and used to perform 1:1 nearest-neighbor matching.

Results: During the study period, 171 outpatients with heart failure were prescribed laxatives after hospital discharge, with 74 patients included in the magnesium oxide group. Using propensity score matching, a cohort of 41 matched pairs was established. After matching, the analysis showed that the hazard ratio (HR) for first readmission within 360 d was 0.33 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.10-0.92, p = 0.035). Additionally, the combined risk of first readmission and all-cause mortality was associated with an HR of 0.30 (95% CI: 0.11-0.82, p = 0.019).

Conclusion: Magnesium oxide was strongly associated with a lower risk of readmission and/or death in patients with heart failure who were prescribed laxatives.

Trial registration: N/A. Cases were registered retrospectively.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

心力衰竭和便秘患者使用氧化镁与再入院风险的关系
背景:便秘在慢性心力衰竭患者中经常观察到,并且与心力衰竭不良结局的风险增加有关。虽然通便药是常用的处方,但对心力衰竭患者的最佳选择仍不确定。我们评估了慢性心力衰竭患者使用氧化镁与心力衰竭预后之间的关系。方法:对2020年1月至2023年12月住院的心力衰竭患者进行回顾性观察研究,出院后继续使用相同的泻药。定期接受氧化镁治疗的患者被归类为氧化镁组,而其他所有患者均为非氧化镁组。主要终点是心力衰竭相关的再入院和全因死亡率,而次要终点是两者的综合。倾向得分是根据基线患者特征计算的,并用于1:1的最近邻匹配。结果:在研究期间,171例心力衰竭门诊患者出院后服用泻药,其中氧化镁组74例。采用倾向评分匹配法,建立了41对配对的队列。匹配后,分析显示360 d内首次再入院的风险比(HR)为0.33(95%可信区间[CI]: 0.10-0.92, p = 0.035)。此外,首次再入院和全因死亡的综合风险与HR为0.30相关(95% CI: 0.11-0.82, p = 0.019)。结论:氧化镁与服用泻药的心力衰竭患者再入院和/或死亡风险降低密切相关。试验注册:无。病例回顾性登记。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
29
审稿时长
8 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信