Central Corneal Thickness and Intraocular Pressure Measured with Goldmann Applanation Tonometer among Patients with Normal Intraocular Pressure.

Q3 Medicine
Pranisha Singh, Srijana Karmacharya, Aparna Rizyal
{"title":"Central Corneal Thickness and Intraocular Pressure Measured with Goldmann Applanation Tonometer among Patients with Normal Intraocular Pressure.","authors":"Pranisha Singh, Srijana Karmacharya, Aparna Rizyal","doi":"10.33314/jnhrc.v23i01.5323","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Intraocular pressure measurement is one of the important and commonly performed examination in Ophthalmology. Goldmann applanation tonometer has been gold standard for measurement of Intraocular pressure. Intraocular pressure measurement is known to be affected by Central corneal thickness. It has been stated that thinner cornea leads to false low Intraocular pressure while thicker cornea leads to false high Intraocular pressure interpretations.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 920 patients of forty and above years with no any anterior segment pathology like corneal diseases, corneal oedema and opacities, uveitis, ocular surgery, ocular trauma or evidence of glaucoma were included. This was cross sectional, descriptive, hospital based study. Ultrasonic pachymeter was used to measure Central corneal thickness and Goldmann applanation tonometer was used to measure Intraocular pressure. A correction factor was applied and corrected Intraocular pressure values were calculated.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The mean Central corneal thickness was 538.70 ± 29.17 µm and Intraocular pressure was 14.72 ± 2.58 mmHg. The mean Central corneal thickness of the females was thinner and mean corrected Intraocular pressure was higher than male. There were statistical significant differences in the mean Central corneal thickness and corrected Intraocular pressure between genders (p= 0.029, p=0.04) respectively. There was a significance difference in mean Central corneal thickness between different age groups (p= <0.001). Corrected Intraocular pressure is negatively correlated with Central corneal thickness (r= - 0.49, p= <0.001). In this study there was a significant association between Central corneal thickness and Intraocular pressure, age, gender and refractive error.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>A thick cornea leads to an overestimation of Intraocular pressure while thin cornea leads to an underestimation of Intraocular pressure. We recommend that Intraocular pressure measurement should be associated with a pachymetry correction to avoid inaccurate readings.</p>","PeriodicalId":16380,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Nepal Health Research Council","volume":"23 1","pages":"94-100"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Nepal Health Research Council","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.33314/jnhrc.v23i01.5323","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Intraocular pressure measurement is one of the important and commonly performed examination in Ophthalmology. Goldmann applanation tonometer has been gold standard for measurement of Intraocular pressure. Intraocular pressure measurement is known to be affected by Central corneal thickness. It has been stated that thinner cornea leads to false low Intraocular pressure while thicker cornea leads to false high Intraocular pressure interpretations.

Methods: A total of 920 patients of forty and above years with no any anterior segment pathology like corneal diseases, corneal oedema and opacities, uveitis, ocular surgery, ocular trauma or evidence of glaucoma were included. This was cross sectional, descriptive, hospital based study. Ultrasonic pachymeter was used to measure Central corneal thickness and Goldmann applanation tonometer was used to measure Intraocular pressure. A correction factor was applied and corrected Intraocular pressure values were calculated.

Results: The mean Central corneal thickness was 538.70 ± 29.17 µm and Intraocular pressure was 14.72 ± 2.58 mmHg. The mean Central corneal thickness of the females was thinner and mean corrected Intraocular pressure was higher than male. There were statistical significant differences in the mean Central corneal thickness and corrected Intraocular pressure between genders (p= 0.029, p=0.04) respectively. There was a significance difference in mean Central corneal thickness between different age groups (p= <0.001). Corrected Intraocular pressure is negatively correlated with Central corneal thickness (r= - 0.49, p= <0.001). In this study there was a significant association between Central corneal thickness and Intraocular pressure, age, gender and refractive error.

Conclusions: A thick cornea leads to an overestimation of Intraocular pressure while thin cornea leads to an underestimation of Intraocular pressure. We recommend that Intraocular pressure measurement should be associated with a pachymetry correction to avoid inaccurate readings.

用Goldmann压扁眼压计测量正常眼压患者角膜中央厚度和眼压。
背景:眼压测量是眼科重要且常用的检查之一。Goldmann眼压计一直是测量眼压的金标准。眼压测量受角膜中央厚度的影响。已有研究表明,较薄的角膜会导致假的低眼压,而较厚的角膜会导致假的高眼压解释。方法:纳入920例40岁及以上无角膜病变、角膜水肿混浊、葡萄膜炎、眼部手术、眼外伤、青光眼等前段病变的患者。这是一项横断面、描述性、基于医院的研究。超声测厚仪测角膜中央厚度,Goldmann眼压计测眼压。应用校正因子并计算校正后的眼压值。结果:角膜中央厚度平均值为538.70±29.17µm,眼压平均值为14.72±2.58 mmHg。女性平均角膜中央厚度较男性薄,平均矫正眼压高于男性。平均角膜中央厚度和校正眼压在性别间差异有统计学意义(p= 0.029, p=0.04)。不同年龄组的平均角膜中央厚度差异有统计学意义(p=)。结论:角膜厚会导致眼压高估,而角膜薄会导致眼压低估。我们建议在测量眼压的同时进行高度仪校正,以避免读数不准确。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
81
审稿时长
15 weeks
期刊介绍: The journal publishes articles related to researches done in the field of biomedical sciences related to all the discipline of the medical sciences, medical education, public health, health care management, including ethical and social issues pertaining to health. The journal gives preference to clinically oriented studies over experimental and animal studies. The Journal would publish peer-reviewed original research papers, case reports, systematic reviews and meta-analysis. Editorial, Guest Editorial, Viewpoint and letter to the editor are solicited by the editorial board. Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ) regarding manuscript submission and processing at JNHRC.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信