Ethnic Differences in the Diagnostic Accuracy of a Quantitative Ultrasound-Derived Fat Fraction Estimator for Hepatic Steatosis: External Validation in Asian and Caucasian Cohorts.

IF 1.4 4区 医学 Q3 ACOUSTICS
Jeung Hui Pyo, Soo Jin Cho, Jaehwan Jee, Goeun Park, Joonghyun Ahn, Kyunga Kim, Mira Kang, Aladar D Ronaszeki, Pál Novák Kaposi, Elio Damato, Patrizia Pacini, Carmen Solitoand, Vito Cantisani, Young Hye Byun
{"title":"Ethnic Differences in the Diagnostic Accuracy of a Quantitative Ultrasound-Derived Fat Fraction Estimator for Hepatic Steatosis: External Validation in Asian and Caucasian Cohorts.","authors":"Jeung Hui Pyo, Soo Jin Cho, Jaehwan Jee, Goeun Park, Joonghyun Ahn, Kyunga Kim, Mira Kang, Aladar D Ronaszeki, Pál Novák Kaposi, Elio Damato, Patrizia Pacini, Carmen Solitoand, Vito Cantisani, Young Hye Byun","doi":"10.1002/jcu.70024","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Ultrasound fat fraction estimation (USFF) using quantitative ultrasonography (QUS) is a promising method for assessing liver fat in metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease (MASLD). However, its performance across different ethnicities remains unclear. This study aimed to externally validate and compare USFF accuracy in Asian and Caucasian cohorts.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective analysis used QUS data from three institutions. Participants underwent QUS and magnetic resonance imaging of the proton density fat fraction (MRI-PDFF), the reference standard. A multivariable regression model was developed using two QUS parameters. Linear regression was used to estimate fat fraction, with adjusted R<sup>2</sup> values assessing model fit. The diagnostic performance of USFF for hepatic fat content thresholds (≥ 5%, ≥ 10%, ≥ 20%) was evaluated using the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The development set included 427 South Korean participants, while the validation set comprised 100 from Hungary and 79 from Italy. R<sup>2</sup> values were 0.689, 0.702, and 0.485 for the development, internal validation, and external validation sets, respectively. AUC for detecting hepatic steatosis (MRI-PDFF ≥ 5%) was 0.939 (development) and 0.863 (external validation). Using a cutoff > 0.513, USFF achieved 85.1% sensitivity and 87.4% specificity.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>USFF is effective but shows variability across populations, highlighting the need for ethnicity-specific models.</p>","PeriodicalId":15386,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical Ultrasound","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Clinical Ultrasound","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/jcu.70024","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ACOUSTICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: Ultrasound fat fraction estimation (USFF) using quantitative ultrasonography (QUS) is a promising method for assessing liver fat in metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease (MASLD). However, its performance across different ethnicities remains unclear. This study aimed to externally validate and compare USFF accuracy in Asian and Caucasian cohorts.

Methods: This retrospective analysis used QUS data from three institutions. Participants underwent QUS and magnetic resonance imaging of the proton density fat fraction (MRI-PDFF), the reference standard. A multivariable regression model was developed using two QUS parameters. Linear regression was used to estimate fat fraction, with adjusted R2 values assessing model fit. The diagnostic performance of USFF for hepatic fat content thresholds (≥ 5%, ≥ 10%, ≥ 20%) was evaluated using the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC).

Results: The development set included 427 South Korean participants, while the validation set comprised 100 from Hungary and 79 from Italy. R2 values were 0.689, 0.702, and 0.485 for the development, internal validation, and external validation sets, respectively. AUC for detecting hepatic steatosis (MRI-PDFF ≥ 5%) was 0.939 (development) and 0.863 (external validation). Using a cutoff > 0.513, USFF achieved 85.1% sensitivity and 87.4% specificity.

Conclusion: USFF is effective but shows variability across populations, highlighting the need for ethnicity-specific models.

肝脏脂肪变性定量超声脂肪含量评估仪诊断准确性的种族差异:亚洲和高加索人群的外部验证。
目的:超声脂肪分数评估(USFF)是一种很有前途的评估代谢功能障碍相关脂肪变性肝病(MASLD)肝脏脂肪的方法。然而,它在不同种族中的表现仍不清楚。本研究旨在外部验证和比较USFF在亚洲和高加索人群中的准确性。方法:回顾性分析来自三家机构的QUS数据。参与者接受了QUS和质子密度脂肪分数(MRI-PDFF)的磁共振成像,这是参考标准。采用两个QUS参数建立了多变量回归模型。采用线性回归估计脂肪含量,调整R2值评估模型拟合。使用受试者工作特征曲线下面积(AUC)评估USFF对肝脏脂肪含量阈值(≥5%,≥10%,≥20%)的诊断性能。结果:开发组包括427名韩国参与者,验证组包括100名匈牙利参与者和79名意大利参与者。开发组、内部验证组和外部验证组的R2值分别为0.689、0.702和0.485。检测肝脏脂肪变性(MRI-PDFF≥5%)的AUC分别为0.939(发展)和0.863(外部验证)。使用截断bb0 0.513, USFF达到85.1%的敏感性和87.4%的特异性。结论:USFF是有效的,但在不同人群中表现出差异,强调需要针对种族的模型。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
248
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Clinical Ultrasound (JCU) is an international journal dedicated to the worldwide dissemination of scientific information on diagnostic and therapeutic applications of medical sonography. The scope of the journal includes--but is not limited to--the following areas: sonography of the gastrointestinal tract, genitourinary tract, vascular system, nervous system, head and neck, chest, breast, musculoskeletal system, and other superficial structures; Doppler applications; obstetric and pediatric applications; and interventional sonography. Studies comparing sonography with other imaging modalities are encouraged, as are studies evaluating the economic impact of sonography. Also within the journal''s scope are innovations and improvements in instrumentation and examination techniques and the use of contrast agents. JCU publishes original research articles, case reports, pictorial essays, technical notes, and letters to the editor. The journal is also dedicated to being an educational resource for its readers, through the publication of review articles and various scientific contributions from members of the editorial board and other world-renowned experts in sonography.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信