Predictive value of left ventricular myocardial constructive work in patients with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction and preclinical diastolic dysfunction.

Q2 Medicine
Aram Chilingaryan, Lusine Tunyan, Milena Arzumanyan, Hovik Balyan
{"title":"Predictive value of left ventricular myocardial constructive work in patients with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction and preclinical diastolic dysfunction.","authors":"Aram Chilingaryan, Lusine Tunyan, Milena Arzumanyan, Hovik Balyan","doi":"10.1186/s44348-025-00053-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>We aimed to find predictors of ejection fraction (EF) deterioration in heart failure with preserved EF (HFpEF) patients to prevent their further deterioration.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We studied 215 patients (mean age, 73 ± 8 years; 63% women) with HFpEF and with records of Charlson Comorbidity Index, glomerular filtration rate. Myocardial work, global longitudinal, radial, circumferential, and area strain. The global work index, global constructive work (GCW), wasted work, global work efficiency was obtained by echocardiography. Patients were followed up for 3 years.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Five patients developed myocardial infarction and were excluded from the study. Baseline EF was higher in female patients (61.2% ± 3.1% vs. 56.4% ± 2.7%, P < 0.002), in patients aged > 70 years (62.4% ± 2.1% vs. 57.1% ± 2.3%, P < 0.005), and in patients with end-diastolic volume index < 60 mL/m<sup>2</sup> (56.1% ± 3.2% vs. 63.4% ± 2.3%, P < 0.001). EF decline compared to baseline was -7.3% ± 1.6% (P < 0.01). EF decline was significantly more in patients aged > 70 years, in patients with coronary artery disease and did not relate to sex, left ventricle size, cardiac index, and glomerular filtration rate. During follow-up 58 patients (27%) had EF < 50%, worsening in area strain (-27.9% ± 8.5% vs. -24.7% ± 5.3%, P < 0.003), global longitudinal strain (-19.7% ± 2.4% vs. -17.1% ± 1.6%, P < 0.005), and GCW (2,378% ± 117% vs. 2,102% ± 10%, P < 0.002). Patients with EF < 50% at the end of the study had less area strain and GCW baseline values compared with patients with EF > 50% (22.4% ± 7.2% vs. -27.6% ± 8.1%, P < 0.002; 2,081 ± 92 vs. 2,489 ± 127, P < 0.001). GCW was the predictor of EF deterioration (area under curve, 0.8853).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>GCW predicts EF decline in HFpEF patients which may help identify this subset of patients and prevent their further deterioration earlier.</p>","PeriodicalId":15229,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Cardiovascular Imaging","volume":"33 1","pages":"11"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12333278/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Cardiovascular Imaging","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s44348-025-00053-6","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: We aimed to find predictors of ejection fraction (EF) deterioration in heart failure with preserved EF (HFpEF) patients to prevent their further deterioration.

Methods: We studied 215 patients (mean age, 73 ± 8 years; 63% women) with HFpEF and with records of Charlson Comorbidity Index, glomerular filtration rate. Myocardial work, global longitudinal, radial, circumferential, and area strain. The global work index, global constructive work (GCW), wasted work, global work efficiency was obtained by echocardiography. Patients were followed up for 3 years.

Results: Five patients developed myocardial infarction and were excluded from the study. Baseline EF was higher in female patients (61.2% ± 3.1% vs. 56.4% ± 2.7%, P < 0.002), in patients aged > 70 years (62.4% ± 2.1% vs. 57.1% ± 2.3%, P < 0.005), and in patients with end-diastolic volume index < 60 mL/m2 (56.1% ± 3.2% vs. 63.4% ± 2.3%, P < 0.001). EF decline compared to baseline was -7.3% ± 1.6% (P < 0.01). EF decline was significantly more in patients aged > 70 years, in patients with coronary artery disease and did not relate to sex, left ventricle size, cardiac index, and glomerular filtration rate. During follow-up 58 patients (27%) had EF < 50%, worsening in area strain (-27.9% ± 8.5% vs. -24.7% ± 5.3%, P < 0.003), global longitudinal strain (-19.7% ± 2.4% vs. -17.1% ± 1.6%, P < 0.005), and GCW (2,378% ± 117% vs. 2,102% ± 10%, P < 0.002). Patients with EF < 50% at the end of the study had less area strain and GCW baseline values compared with patients with EF > 50% (22.4% ± 7.2% vs. -27.6% ± 8.1%, P < 0.002; 2,081 ± 92 vs. 2,489 ± 127, P < 0.001). GCW was the predictor of EF deterioration (area under curve, 0.8853).

Conclusions: GCW predicts EF decline in HFpEF patients which may help identify this subset of patients and prevent their further deterioration earlier.

Abstract Image

左心室心肌构建功对保留射血分数和临床前舒张功能不全的心衰患者的预测价值。
背景:我们的目的是寻找心力衰竭保留EF (HFpEF)患者射血分数恶化的预测因素,以防止其进一步恶化。方法:研究215例患者(平均年龄73±8岁;(63%女性)HFpEF,并有Charlson合并症指数、肾小球滤过率记录。心肌功,整体纵向,径向,周向和区域应变。通过超声心动图获得总工作指数、总建设性工作、浪费工作、总工作效率。患者随访3年。结果:5例患者发生心肌梗死,被排除在研究之外。基线EF在女性患者中(61.2%±3.1% vs. 56.4%±2.7%,p70年)高于冠心病患者(62.4%±2.1% vs. 57.1%±2.3%,p2(56.1%±3.2% vs. 63.4%±2.3%,p70年),且与性别、左心室大小、心脏指数和肾小球滤过率无关。在随访期间,58例(27%)患者EF为50%(22.4%±7.2% vs -27.6%±8.1%)。结论:GCW预测HFpEF患者EF下降,可能有助于识别这类患者并早期预防其进一步恶化。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Cardiovascular Imaging
Journal of Cardiovascular Imaging Medicine-Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
42
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信