Glass half full: A framework for setting realistic water quality conservation targets.

IF 2.3 4区 环境科学与生态学 Q3 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
Haleigh Summers, James O Eckberg, Heidi M Peterson
{"title":"Glass half full: A framework for setting realistic water quality conservation targets.","authors":"Haleigh Summers, James O Eckberg, Heidi M Peterson","doi":"10.1002/jeq2.70064","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>A case study was launched to quantify potential water quality benefits attainable through practical and realistic conservation implementation targets. The Lake Michigan Basin was selected because of its importance as a dairy, grain, and oilseed production region that supports a range of ecosystems and endangered species. The objective was to build a framework, implementing a widely accessible tool that could be applied by local conservation staff to set practical, watershed-level, clean water targets. The US Environmental Protection Agency's Pollutant Load Estimation Tool, which is free and provides a user-friendly web interface, was applied to quantify phosphorus and sediment load reduction from six conservation scenarios in each Hydrologic Unit Code-8 watershed. Conservation scenarios included rotational grazing, cover crops, conservation tillage, nutrient management, prairie strips, and a combination of the practices referred to as \"regenerative agriculture.\" Each scenario was compared to a baseline of current cover crop and conservation tillage adoption rates, established using remote sensing data. The model estimated that implementing the regenerative agriculture scenario, which would require an additional 2640 km<sup>2</sup> of conservation and $260 million in investment, could reduce phosphorus loads by 21% and sediment loads by 10% compared to current loading. Results confirm that conservation investments by multiple stakeholders at the federal, state, and local levels can result in meaningful impacts to achieve water quality goals. This framework can be applied to other regions with minimal data inputs, making it a scalable approach to guide collective action toward water quality conservation targets.</p>","PeriodicalId":15732,"journal":{"name":"Journal of environmental quality","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of environmental quality","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/jeq2.70064","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

A case study was launched to quantify potential water quality benefits attainable through practical and realistic conservation implementation targets. The Lake Michigan Basin was selected because of its importance as a dairy, grain, and oilseed production region that supports a range of ecosystems and endangered species. The objective was to build a framework, implementing a widely accessible tool that could be applied by local conservation staff to set practical, watershed-level, clean water targets. The US Environmental Protection Agency's Pollutant Load Estimation Tool, which is free and provides a user-friendly web interface, was applied to quantify phosphorus and sediment load reduction from six conservation scenarios in each Hydrologic Unit Code-8 watershed. Conservation scenarios included rotational grazing, cover crops, conservation tillage, nutrient management, prairie strips, and a combination of the practices referred to as "regenerative agriculture." Each scenario was compared to a baseline of current cover crop and conservation tillage adoption rates, established using remote sensing data. The model estimated that implementing the regenerative agriculture scenario, which would require an additional 2640 km2 of conservation and $260 million in investment, could reduce phosphorus loads by 21% and sediment loads by 10% compared to current loading. Results confirm that conservation investments by multiple stakeholders at the federal, state, and local levels can result in meaningful impacts to achieve water quality goals. This framework can be applied to other regions with minimal data inputs, making it a scalable approach to guide collective action toward water quality conservation targets.

半杯水:制定现实的水质保护目标的框架。
本署展开个案研究,量化透过实际可行的保育实施目标,可能带来的水质效益。密歇根湖盆地之所以被选中,是因为它作为奶制品、谷物和油籽生产区的重要性,支持着一系列生态系统和濒危物种。其目标是建立一个框架,实施一种可广泛使用的工具,使当地的养护工作人员能够应用该工具来制定实际的流域清洁用水目标。美国环境保护署的污染物负荷估算工具是免费的,并提供了一个用户友好的网络界面,该工具被用于量化每个水文单元代码-8流域的六个保护方案的磷和沉积物负荷减少。保护方案包括轮牧、覆盖作物、保护性耕作、养分管理、草原带以及被称为“再生农业”的综合实践。每个情景都与利用遥感数据确定的当前覆盖作物和保护性耕作采用率基线进行了比较。该模型估计,实施再生农业方案,将需要额外的2640平方公里的保护和2.6亿美元的投资,与目前的负荷相比,可以减少21%的磷负荷和10%的泥沙负荷。结果证实,联邦、州和地方各级的多方利益相关者的保护投资可以产生有意义的影响,以实现水质目标。该框架可以以最少的数据输入应用于其他地区,使其成为指导集体行动实现水质保护目标的可扩展方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of environmental quality
Journal of environmental quality 环境科学-环境科学
CiteScore
4.90
自引率
8.30%
发文量
123
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Articles in JEQ cover various aspects of anthropogenic impacts on the environment, including agricultural, terrestrial, atmospheric, and aquatic systems, with emphasis on the understanding of underlying processes. To be acceptable for consideration in JEQ, a manuscript must make a significant contribution to the advancement of knowledge or toward a better understanding of existing concepts. The study should define principles of broad applicability, be related to problems over a sizable geographic area, or be of potential interest to a representative number of scientists. Emphasis is given to the understanding of underlying processes rather than to monitoring. Contributions are accepted from all disciplines for consideration by the editorial board. Manuscripts may be volunteered, invited, or coordinated as a special section or symposium.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信