{"title":"Reaction times of cochlear implant users to a change in electrode or modulation frequency in the presence of a masker.","authors":"E Noordanus, L H M Mens, A J van Opstal","doi":"10.1016/j.heares.2025.109375","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Spatial and temporal selectivity vary substantially between cochlear implant users, resulting in large differences in speech perception. Direct electrode stimulation offers precise control to capture this variability. However, most studies using direct stimulation have not incorporated interfering stimuli, which may not reflect the complex nature of speech and ambient noise. To address this gap, we introduce the Electrode Interaction Reaction Time (ELI-RT) paradigm, which uses amplitude-modulated, interleaved pulses on two closely spaced electrodes at clinical pulse rates. ELI-RT includes two test types: \"∆EL\", measuring the participants' manual reaction times to a change in stimulated electrode, and \"∆MF\", measuring reaction times to a modulation frequency change. Both tests include ongoing interference on an adjacent electrode. We also measured speech-in-noise recognition thresholds. We analyzed data from 16 unilateral cochlear implant users and found that ELI-RT could dissociate participant-, electrode-, and test-dependent factors. The effect of the electrode location along the array differed considerably between participants. The ∆EL and ∆MF tests provided partly complementary insights. Reaction times on these tests correlated with speech-in-noise perception, especially for changes that typically yielded shorter reaction times and for electrodes located in the middle of the array. In conclusion, reaction times to changes in the place of stimulation and modulation frequency, in the presence of interference from an adjacent electrode, offer detailed insights into the acuity of information transfer along the cochlear implant electrode array to the central auditory pathways in cochlear implant users.</p>","PeriodicalId":12881,"journal":{"name":"Hearing Research","volume":"466 ","pages":"109375"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Hearing Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heares.2025.109375","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/7/23 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Spatial and temporal selectivity vary substantially between cochlear implant users, resulting in large differences in speech perception. Direct electrode stimulation offers precise control to capture this variability. However, most studies using direct stimulation have not incorporated interfering stimuli, which may not reflect the complex nature of speech and ambient noise. To address this gap, we introduce the Electrode Interaction Reaction Time (ELI-RT) paradigm, which uses amplitude-modulated, interleaved pulses on two closely spaced electrodes at clinical pulse rates. ELI-RT includes two test types: "∆EL", measuring the participants' manual reaction times to a change in stimulated electrode, and "∆MF", measuring reaction times to a modulation frequency change. Both tests include ongoing interference on an adjacent electrode. We also measured speech-in-noise recognition thresholds. We analyzed data from 16 unilateral cochlear implant users and found that ELI-RT could dissociate participant-, electrode-, and test-dependent factors. The effect of the electrode location along the array differed considerably between participants. The ∆EL and ∆MF tests provided partly complementary insights. Reaction times on these tests correlated with speech-in-noise perception, especially for changes that typically yielded shorter reaction times and for electrodes located in the middle of the array. In conclusion, reaction times to changes in the place of stimulation and modulation frequency, in the presence of interference from an adjacent electrode, offer detailed insights into the acuity of information transfer along the cochlear implant electrode array to the central auditory pathways in cochlear implant users.
期刊介绍:
The aim of the journal is to provide a forum for papers concerned with basic peripheral and central auditory mechanisms. Emphasis is on experimental and clinical studies, but theoretical and methodological papers will also be considered. The journal publishes original research papers, review and mini- review articles, rapid communications, method/protocol and perspective articles.
Papers submitted should deal with auditory anatomy, physiology, psychophysics, imaging, modeling and behavioural studies in animals and humans, as well as hearing aids and cochlear implants. Papers dealing with the vestibular system are also considered for publication. Papers on comparative aspects of hearing and on effects of drugs and environmental contaminants on hearing function will also be considered. Clinical papers will be accepted when they contribute to the understanding of normal and pathological hearing functions.