Accumulated Hard-tissue Debris Removal Using Different Ultrasonic Power Settings: A Micro-CT Study.

IF 2.1 Q1 Dentistry
Flávia de Moura Pereira, Kusai Baroudi, Tarun Walia, Vivek Padmanabhan, Emmanuel Joao Nogueira Leal da Silva, Carolina de Oliveira Lima, Rafael Pino Vitti, Rayana Duarte Khoury, Flávia Goulart da Rosa Cardoso
{"title":"Accumulated Hard-tissue Debris Removal Using Different Ultrasonic Power Settings: A Micro-CT Study.","authors":"Flávia de Moura Pereira, Kusai Baroudi, Tarun Walia, Vivek Padmanabhan, Emmanuel Joao Nogueira Leal da Silva, Carolina de Oliveira Lima, Rafael Pino Vitti, Rayana Duarte Khoury, Flávia Goulart da Rosa Cardoso","doi":"10.1055/s-0045-1810441","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>To evaluate the effectiveness of the Irrisonic Power ultrasonic tip activated at different power settings (10 and 30%) on the removal of accumulated hard-tissue debris (AHTD) from mandibular premolars using micro-computed tomography (micro-CT) analysis.A total of 20 extracted mandibular premolars were pair-matched based on root canal morphology using micro-CT imaging. All specimens were prepared with Reciproc R25 and randomly assigned to two experimental groups (<i>n</i>  =  10) according to the power setting used during final irrigation: Irrisonic Power 10% or Irrisonic Power 30%. Supplementary irrigation was performed with sodium hypochlorite and EDTA. AHTD was quantified pre- and post-irrigation using standardized micro-CT analysis and ImageJ software.Data were statistically analyzed using the Mann-Whitney test (<i>α </i> =  0.05).Both protocols significantly reduced AHTD after supplementary irrigation. The Irrisonic Power 30% group exhibited lower residual debris (0.16  ±   0.13%) than the Irrisonic Power 10% group (0.90  ±   1.16%), with a statistically significant difference (<i>p</i> <  0.05).Supplementary irrigation with the Irrisonic ultrasonic tip at 30% power was more effective in removing AHTD than the 10% power setting.</p>","PeriodicalId":12028,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Dentistry","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Dentistry","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0045-1810441","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Dentistry","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

To evaluate the effectiveness of the Irrisonic Power ultrasonic tip activated at different power settings (10 and 30%) on the removal of accumulated hard-tissue debris (AHTD) from mandibular premolars using micro-computed tomography (micro-CT) analysis.A total of 20 extracted mandibular premolars were pair-matched based on root canal morphology using micro-CT imaging. All specimens were prepared with Reciproc R25 and randomly assigned to two experimental groups (n  =  10) according to the power setting used during final irrigation: Irrisonic Power 10% or Irrisonic Power 30%. Supplementary irrigation was performed with sodium hypochlorite and EDTA. AHTD was quantified pre- and post-irrigation using standardized micro-CT analysis and ImageJ software.Data were statistically analyzed using the Mann-Whitney test (α  =  0.05).Both protocols significantly reduced AHTD after supplementary irrigation. The Irrisonic Power 30% group exhibited lower residual debris (0.16  ±   0.13%) than the Irrisonic Power 10% group (0.90  ±   1.16%), with a statistically significant difference (p <  0.05).Supplementary irrigation with the Irrisonic ultrasonic tip at 30% power was more effective in removing AHTD than the 10% power setting.

使用不同超声功率设置去除累积硬组织碎片:微ct研究。
利用微计算机断层扫描(micro-CT)分析不同功率设置(10和30%)激活的irisonic功率超声针尖对去除下颌前磨牙积累性硬组织碎片(AHTD)的有效性。采用显微ct成像对20颗拔除的下颌前磨牙根管形态进行配对。所有标本均用Reciproc R25制备,并根据末次冲洗时使用的功率设置随机分为两个实验组(n = 10):Irrisonic功率10%或Irrisonic功率30%。次氯酸钠和EDTA补灌。采用标准化微ct分析和ImageJ软件定量灌前后的AHTD。数据采用Mann-Whitney检验进行统计学分析(α = 0.05)。两种方案均可显著降低补灌后的AHTD。Irrisonic Power 30%组的残屑率(0.16 ± 0.13%)低于Irrisonic Power 10%组(0.90 ± 1.16%),差异有统计学意义(p
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
European Journal of Dentistry
European Journal of Dentistry Dentistry-Dentistry (all)
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
161
期刊介绍: The European Journal of Dentistry is the official journal of the Dental Investigations Society, based in Turkey. It is a double-blinded peer-reviewed, Open Access, multi-disciplinary international journal addressing various aspects of dentistry. The journal''s board consists of eminent investigators in dentistry from across the globe and presents an ideal international composition. The journal encourages its authors to submit original investigations, reviews, and reports addressing various divisions of dentistry including oral pathology, prosthodontics, endodontics, orthodontics etc. It is available both online and in print.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信