Measuring Personal Recovery in a Sample of People with Opioid Use Disorder: Psychometric Properties of the Norwegian Version of the Questionnaire about the Process of Recovery.

IF 2.3 3区 医学 Q2 PSYCHIATRY
Anne Marciuch, Regina Skar-Fröding, Kristin Klemmetsby Solli, Lars Tanum, Bente Weimand
{"title":"Measuring Personal Recovery in a Sample of People with Opioid Use Disorder: Psychometric Properties of the Norwegian Version of the Questionnaire about the Process of Recovery.","authors":"Anne Marciuch, Regina Skar-Fröding, Kristin Klemmetsby Solli, Lars Tanum, Bente Weimand","doi":"10.1159/000547897","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Personal recovery is an important target in mental health care settings and has been suggested as the \"bridging principle\" between mental health care and substance use disorder (SUD) treatment. However, few psychometrically evaluated scales exist for measuring personal recovery in SUD research, and the questionnaire about the process of recovery (QPR), a measure of personal recovery widely used in the mental health field, has not been previously psychometrically evaluated in such a context. The aim of this study was to explore the psychometric properties of the 22- and 15-item versions of the Norwegian translation of the QPR in terms of factor structure and internal consistency in an opioid use disorder (OUD) sample.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 156 people with OUD filled out the QPR. Exploratory factor analysis with principal axis factor and maximum likelihood as extraction method was performed to assess the dimensionality of the 22- and 15-item versions of the Norwegian translation of the QPR. Internal consistency was calculated according to Cronbach's alpha.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Internal consistency for the 22-item version was α = 0.917. After removal of three items with low factor loadings internal consistency was α = 0.922. Internal consistency for 15-items version was α = 0.915. Exploratory factor analyses showed a clear one-factor solution for both the 22-item and 15-item version.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Both the 15- and the 22-item versions of QPR showed a clear one-factor solution; however, the 15-item version showed the strongest results in terms of explained variance. Thus, the 15-item version is the recommended version to use in SUD samples.</p>","PeriodicalId":11902,"journal":{"name":"European Addiction Research","volume":" ","pages":"1-11"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Addiction Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1159/000547897","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Personal recovery is an important target in mental health care settings and has been suggested as the "bridging principle" between mental health care and substance use disorder (SUD) treatment. However, few psychometrically evaluated scales exist for measuring personal recovery in SUD research, and the questionnaire about the process of recovery (QPR), a measure of personal recovery widely used in the mental health field, has not been previously psychometrically evaluated in such a context. The aim of this study was to explore the psychometric properties of the 22- and 15-item versions of the Norwegian translation of the QPR in terms of factor structure and internal consistency in an opioid use disorder (OUD) sample.

Methods: A total of 156 people with OUD filled out the QPR. Exploratory factor analysis with principal axis factor and maximum likelihood as extraction method was performed to assess the dimensionality of the 22- and 15-item versions of the Norwegian translation of the QPR. Internal consistency was calculated according to Cronbach's alpha.

Results: Internal consistency for the 22-item version was α = 0.917. After removal of three items with low factor loadings internal consistency was α = 0.922. Internal consistency for 15-items version was α = 0.915. Exploratory factor analyses showed a clear one-factor solution for both the 22-item and 15-item version.

Conclusion: Both the 15- and the 22-item versions of QPR showed a clear one-factor solution; however, the 15-item version showed the strongest results in terms of explained variance. Thus, the 15-item version is the recommended version to use in SUD samples.

测量阿片类药物使用障碍患者样本的个人恢复-挪威版关于恢复过程的问卷(QPR)的心理测量特性。
背景:个人康复是精神卫生保健的一个重要目标,被认为是精神卫生保健和物质使用障碍(SUD)治疗之间的“桥梁原则”。然而,在SUD研究中,很少有用于测量个人恢复的心理测量量表,而在心理健康领域广泛使用的个人恢复测量问卷(QPR)也没有在这一背景下进行心理测量评估。目的:目的是探讨在阿片类药物使用障碍样本中,QPR的挪威语翻译的22和15项版本在因素结构和内部一致性方面的心理测量特性。方法:156例阿片类药物使用障碍患者填写QPR。采用主轴因子和最大似然作为提取方法进行探索性因子分析,以评估QPR挪威语翻译的22和15项版本的维度。内部一致性根据Cronbach’s alpha计算。结果:22个条目版本的内部一致性为α = 0.917。剔除低因子负荷项目后,内部一致性为α = 0.922。15项版本的内部一致性为α = 0.915。探索性因子分析显示,对于22项和15项的版本,都有一个明确的单因素解决方案。结论:15题和22题QPR均表现出明显的单因素解;然而,15项版本在解释方差方面显示出最强的结果。因此,推荐在SUD样品中使用15项的版本。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
European Addiction Research
European Addiction Research SUBSTANCE ABUSE-PSYCHIATRY
CiteScore
6.80
自引率
5.10%
发文量
32
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: ''European Addiction Research'' is a unique international scientific journal for the rapid publication of innovative research covering all aspects of addiction and related disorders. Representing an interdisciplinary forum for the exchange of recent data and expert opinion, it reflects the importance of a comprehensive approach to resolve the problems of substance abuse and addiction in Europe. Coverage ranges from clinical and research advances in the fields of psychiatry, biology, pharmacology and epidemiology to social, and legal implications of policy decisions. The goal is to facilitate open discussion among those interested in the scientific and clinical aspects of prevention, diagnosis and therapy as well as dealing with legal issues. An excellent range of original papers makes ‘European Addiction Research’ the forum of choice for all.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信