The role of pathological response in predicting the benefit of adjuvant therapy after neoadjuvant chemoimmunotherapy in patients with esophageal cancer.

IF 2.9 2区 医学 Q2 ONCOLOGY
Ejso Pub Date : 2025-10-01 Epub Date: 2025-08-05 DOI:10.1016/j.ejso.2025.110360
Maohui Chen, Yizhou Huang, Rujing Zhang, Bingqiang Cai, Yongcong Zhang, Chuanquan Lin, Shuliang Zhang, Taidui Zeng, Chun Chen, Bin Zheng
{"title":"The role of pathological response in predicting the benefit of adjuvant therapy after neoadjuvant chemoimmunotherapy in patients with esophageal cancer.","authors":"Maohui Chen, Yizhou Huang, Rujing Zhang, Bingqiang Cai, Yongcong Zhang, Chuanquan Lin, Shuliang Zhang, Taidui Zeng, Chun Chen, Bin Zheng","doi":"10.1016/j.ejso.2025.110360","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Neoadjuvant chemoimmunotherapy has demonstrated significant survival benefits in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC), but the value of postoperative adjuvant therapy remains controversial. Tumor regression grade (TRG) serves as a crucial pathological indicator of response to neoadjuvant treatment, yet its role in guiding adjuvant therapy is unclear. This study aimed to investigate the prognostic significance of TRG in postoperative adjuvant therapy.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This multicenter retrospective cohort study included 169 thoracic ESCC patients who underwent R0 resection after neoadjuvant chemoimmunotherapy between January 2019 and December 2022. Patients were stratified into TRG 0-1 (good response) and TRG 2-3 (poor response) groups. Survival outcomes were analyzed using Kaplan-Meier and Cox regression models.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>With a median follow-up of 34 months, adjuvant immunotherapy significantly improved 3-year overall survival (OS) compared to no adjuvant therapy (82.1 % vs. 66.3 %, p = 0.042), though no significant difference in disease-free survival (DFS) was observed. Subgroup analysis revealed that adjuvant therapy notably improved OS in patients with TRG 0-1 (93.2 % vs. 73.3 %, p = 0.015), but not in TRG 2-3. Multivariate analysis confirmed adjuvant immunotherapy as an independent protective factor in TRG 0-1 (HR = 0.22, p = 0.015), while vascular invasion was an adverse factor in TRG 2-3. Additionally, patients with pathological lymph node involvement (yPN+) benefited from adjuvant immunotherapy (HR = 0.41, p = 0.019).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>TRG and lymph node status may serve as valuable markers to identify ESCC patients who benefit from adjuvant immunotherapy, facilitating personalized postoperative treatment strategies.</p>","PeriodicalId":11522,"journal":{"name":"Ejso","volume":"51 10","pages":"110360"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ejso","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejso.2025.110360","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/8/5 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Neoadjuvant chemoimmunotherapy has demonstrated significant survival benefits in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC), but the value of postoperative adjuvant therapy remains controversial. Tumor regression grade (TRG) serves as a crucial pathological indicator of response to neoadjuvant treatment, yet its role in guiding adjuvant therapy is unclear. This study aimed to investigate the prognostic significance of TRG in postoperative adjuvant therapy.

Methods: This multicenter retrospective cohort study included 169 thoracic ESCC patients who underwent R0 resection after neoadjuvant chemoimmunotherapy between January 2019 and December 2022. Patients were stratified into TRG 0-1 (good response) and TRG 2-3 (poor response) groups. Survival outcomes were analyzed using Kaplan-Meier and Cox regression models.

Results: With a median follow-up of 34 months, adjuvant immunotherapy significantly improved 3-year overall survival (OS) compared to no adjuvant therapy (82.1 % vs. 66.3 %, p = 0.042), though no significant difference in disease-free survival (DFS) was observed. Subgroup analysis revealed that adjuvant therapy notably improved OS in patients with TRG 0-1 (93.2 % vs. 73.3 %, p = 0.015), but not in TRG 2-3. Multivariate analysis confirmed adjuvant immunotherapy as an independent protective factor in TRG 0-1 (HR = 0.22, p = 0.015), while vascular invasion was an adverse factor in TRG 2-3. Additionally, patients with pathological lymph node involvement (yPN+) benefited from adjuvant immunotherapy (HR = 0.41, p = 0.019).

Conclusion: TRG and lymph node status may serve as valuable markers to identify ESCC patients who benefit from adjuvant immunotherapy, facilitating personalized postoperative treatment strategies.

食管癌患者新辅助化疗免疫治疗后病理反应在预测辅助治疗获益中的作用。
背景:新辅助化疗免疫治疗在食管鳞状细胞癌(ESCC)中显示出显著的生存益处,但术后辅助治疗的价值仍存在争议。肿瘤消退分级(Tumor regression grade, TRG)是新辅助治疗应答的重要病理指标,但其在辅助治疗中的指导作用尚不清楚。本研究旨在探讨TRG在术后辅助治疗中的预后意义。方法:这项多中心回顾性队列研究纳入了2019年1月至2022年12月期间接受新辅助化疗免疫治疗后R0切除的169例胸部ESCC患者。将患者分为TRG 0-1(反应良好)组和TRG 2-3(反应不良)组。生存结局采用Kaplan-Meier和Cox回归模型进行分析。结果:中位随访时间为34个月,辅助免疫治疗显著提高了3年总生存率(OS) (82.1% vs 66.3%, p = 0.042),但无病生存率(DFS)无显著差异。亚组分析显示,辅助治疗显著改善了TRG 0-1患者的OS (93.2% vs. 73.3%, p = 0.015),但在TRG 2-3患者中没有改善。多因素分析证实辅助免疫治疗是TRG 0-1的独立保护因素(HR = 0.22, p = 0.015),而血管侵犯是TRG 2-3的不利因素。此外,病理性淋巴结受累(yPN+)患者受益于辅助免疫治疗(HR = 0.41, p = 0.019)。结论:TRG和淋巴结状态可能是鉴别ESCC患者是否受益于辅助免疫治疗的有价值的指标,有助于制定个性化的术后治疗策略。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Ejso
Ejso 医学-外科
CiteScore
6.40
自引率
2.60%
发文量
1148
审稿时长
41 days
期刊介绍: JSO - European Journal of Surgical Oncology ("the Journal of Cancer Surgery") is the Official Journal of the European Society of Surgical Oncology and BASO ~ the Association for Cancer Surgery. The EJSO aims to advance surgical oncology research and practice through the publication of original research articles, review articles, editorials, debates and correspondence.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信